Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shirley Sherrod's USDA Job Offer: Deputy Director of the Office of Advocacy and Outreach

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:36 AM
Original message
Shirley Sherrod's USDA Job Offer: Deputy Director of the Office of Advocacy and Outreach
Source: CBS News

Shirley Sherrod, who was forced to resign from the Department of Agriculture after an out-of-context video of remarks she made were published on a conservative website, is still considering the formal job offer she received from the USDA, she tells CBS News Producer Daniel Steinberger.

The department has offered Sherrod a position titled Deputy Director of the office of advocacy and outreach at the USDA, she says. The offer was delivered in a draft that puts into writing what Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack offered her on the phone last week.

Sherrod said she sat down to read through the offer for the first time this morning, but has not read it in its entirety yet. She still has many questions about the offer before coming to any decision, she said, such as who is the director of the department and whether and how much money is appropriated for the work that should be accomplished in the position.

"I need to have a conversation with someone," Sherrod said, though she was not sure whether she would speak with Vilsack directly.

Sherrod said she hopes to reach a decision by next week.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20011765-503544.html?tag=stack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't forget to sue Breitbart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. This sounds like a fake position they created just for her to make her the new watch dog.
Why not just give her her old job back? Rather than create a fake job. These fake jobs are always the first ones cut when budget time rolls around in 6 more months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't thing that they will be cutting her from the rolls so quickly though. Sounds like a job
She would be excellent in. Budget is huge because it determines whether or not she woul actually get to help people.

She needs a budget for a pretty sizable staff. I doubt she'll get more than enough for 2 positions and that won't do shit.

Yes they may have created it for her but she can use it for the greater good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Was created in 2008 farm Bill.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Sure does and Shirley knows it.
In one of her interviews last week she basically said she wouldn't be a show pony.

She did, however, phrase it more artfully than I just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. This isn't a fake job--look at the 2008 farm Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. It's not a fake and it is a PROMOTION. It was established under the 2008 Farm Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I didn't see the promotion part - would it elevate her to the Senior
Executive Service? I was surprised to hear that her old position was only a GS-15. There are also pay scale differences, DC area is near the top but cost of living eats it up quickly.

I'm a civil servant in the middle of a move and it's a LOT of work. We are going from DC to Florida - so I'm getting a pay cut of about 7.5% - the elimination of state income tax doesn't quite make up for it - but gets us close to breaking even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Did you read the act? It answers your questions. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I read the Secretary's memo - but didn't see anything defining the
grade - my eyes are blurred at this point. What paragraph is it in?

To be a promotion, the deputy's job should be defined as either Senior Executive Service/SES (no more steps, just a salary range from $119,554 to $179,700) or the Executive Scale - EL 5 (lowest at $147,500) to 1 (highest at $199,700). While the Executive Scale goes higher, they aren't tenured positions and serve at the pleasure of the President. The SES has both career and political appointee jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. I'm sorry you don't understand that a deputy director position is a promotion.
I'm even sorrier, that having been given the proper PL cite, you aren't able to use 'the Internets' to find the information you seek.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I accept your apology - but reparations would be even better. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. It is NOT a fake position--Read the ACT establishing it--as of 2009/2008 Farm Bill.
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 01:35 PM by msanthrope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Self delete
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 01:40 PM by msanthrope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great question.
How much of a budget does this job you just made up for me to cover your ass actually have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Lie! Job established under the 2008 farm Bill....
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 01:36 PM by msanthrope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. If they really regretted what they did to her they'd offer her her OLD job back.
Instead they offered her a different job she didn't ask for, with their fingers crossed that she won't take it, so they can forget the whole thing happened while still getting undeserved credit for trying to fix it.

Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. she's in a position to do much more now because she's in the spotlight.
i'm not privvy to the details of the job offer, so i don't know if it's a fluff job or a serious promotion.

i do know that her political capital and media access has dramatically increased because of this incident, and that could be put to good use. the usda would be wise to keep her on in a position where she can very visibly do significant good.

her old job made her largely invisible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. She deserves and should be offered her OLD job back, if that's what she wants.
It was taken from her based on trumped up evidence. The USDA should have instantly restored it. Why didn't they? Are you really so naive to think the USDA wants to draw attention to what it did to Shirley Sherrod by putting her in a visible position now?

There is nothing less visible in the Federal government than a "deputy" position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. she will likely have a bit of media attention no matter what happens
and if she asks for her old job back, i'd be VERY surprised if they didn't give it to her.

they would NOT want her going to the media saying "all i wanted was my old job back but they said blah blah blah so i'm writing a tell-all book instead."

and while i agree that "deputy" positions are not the most visible in general, this is a bit of an unusual case and besides, we have to compare this to her old position, in which she was completely invisible.

the media will be focused on her no matter what, so the usda wouldn't be "drawing attention" to her. the attention is already there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. She was hardly "invisible" in her previous position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. This is a Promotion!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. good grief
calm down

If Shirley has questions about the position (salary, staff, location) then I have questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Maybe you aren't familiar with the typical "kick 'em upstairs" govt. promotion - but I've seen
plenty of them in my long govt. career. A deputy position is the typical choice for a "promotion" of an employee who needs to be gotten out of the way for whatever reason, but whom it would be political suicide to fire for whatever reason (not uncommonly, because the employee is female, a minority, or both). Trust me - a government deputy position looks MUCH better on paper than it really is. Deputies have ZERO autonomy, they exist solely to take boring meetings for the boss, travel to hell holes the boss doesn't want to travel to, referee employee disputes, etc. - in short, it's a crap job for somebody like Shirley Sherrod, who was previously a director and who no doubt had a deputy director of her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. So, you aren't a deputy, or anywhere near it.
Edited on Tue Jul-27-10 09:39 PM by msanthrope
In your "long government career," you've failed to score even a 'kick 'em upstairs' promotion.

What does that say for you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC