Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panasonic Corp. & Whirlpool Corp. subsidiary agree to Plead Guilty for

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 07:28 PM
Original message
Panasonic Corp. & Whirlpool Corp. subsidiary agree to Plead Guilty for
Edited on Thu Sep-30-10 07:30 PM by Land Shark
Source: Department of Justice

Companies Agree to Pay a Total of $140.9 Million in Criminal Fines



WASHINGTON — Panasonic Corporation and a Whirlpool Corporation subsidiary, Embraco North America Inc., have agreed to plead guilty and to pay a total of $140.9 million in criminal fines for their role in an international conspiracy to fix the prices of refrigerant compressors, which are used in refrigerators and freezers in homes and businesses, the Department of Justice announced today.

According to separate one-count felony charges filed today in U.S. District Court in Detroit, Panasonic, a Japanese corporation, and Embraco, a Delaware-based refrigerant compressor producer and seller, participated in a conspiracy to fix the prices of refrigerant compressors sold in the United States and elsewhere. The department said the conspiracy took place from at least as early as Oct. 14, 2004, until on or about Dec. 31, 2007. According to the plea agreements, which are subject to court approval, both companies have agreed to cooperate with the department's ongoing refrigerant compressor investigation. Embraco has agreed to pay a $91.8 million criminal fine and Panasonic has agreed to pay a $49.1 million criminal fine.

{...} Both Panasonic and Embraco are charged with price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum fine of $100 million for corporations. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

Read more: http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2010/262783.htm



Who would have thunk that corporations would engage in international criminal conspiracies just to make more bucks?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. The only thing that makes this surprising
is that they actually got busted and are paying real fines (well, time will tell on that I s'pose).

This activity is the norm. This is how capitalism works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whoa. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder if the profits were worth the fines? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about the "Anti-Trust" laws re monopoly -- ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The price fixing laws are part of the Sherman Antitrust act, as amended... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sherman-anti-trust is also anti-monopoly ... isn't it ? And being ignored ... ???
Edited on Thu Sep-30-10 10:42 PM by defendandprotect
Well, looks like we've had a bit of hanky-panky and deform with this act ... ???

"Although the language forbids all monopolies ... the courts have held that the act ONLY applies...


:crazy:


Sherman Antitrust Act and monopolies
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first measure passed by the U.S. Congress to prohibit abusive monopolies, and in some ways it remains the most important.
www.linfo.org/sherman.html - Cached


Sherman Anti-Trust Act legal definition of Sherman Anti-Trust ...
Although the language of the Sherman Act forbids all monopolies, the courts have held that the act only applies to those monopolies ... Sherman Anti-Trust Act
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/​Sherman+Anti... - Cached
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. And in tonights "future news that's bound to happen"
Lawmakers repeal the "Sherman Act".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Well, if it were up to Repukes ... it would be gone!!
Edited on Thu Sep-30-10 10:45 PM by defendandprotect
Seems like it's intent has been somewhat distorted at any rate!!

Sherman Antitrust Act and monopolies
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first measure passed by the U.S. Congress to prohibit abusive monopolies, and in some ways it remains the most important.
www.linfo.org/sherman.html - Cached


Sherman Anti-Trust Act legal definition of Sherman Anti-Trust ...
Although the language of the Sherman Act forbids all monopolies, the courts have held that the act only applies to those monopolies ... Sherman Anti-Trust Act
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/​Sherman+Anti... - Cached
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Sherman+Anti-Trust+Act



:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. A pal of mine was laid-off from Whirpool.
This should be of great interest to him. Many thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Didn't Whirlpool just move their last US factory to Mexico? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2 Much Tribulation Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. How many Friday newspapers will cover this DOJ press release?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC