Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama confident of tax cut deal before Jan. 1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 01:57 PM
Original message
Obama confident of tax cut deal before Jan. 1
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama said Saturday that he's ready "to roll up my sleeves" and work with congressional leaders on a tax cut deal before rates are set to rise on Jan. 1.

<...>

"We need to get this resolved and I'm confident we can do it," he said. He said he'd work through the weekend and into next week to find a compromise.

Obama said lawmakers must give the American people "the peace of mind that their taxes will not go up" come the new year. He said that will require compromise by both sides.

<...>

Obama repeated his position that it didn't make sense to extend tax cuts for the wealthy — individuals with incomes over $200,000 and couples over $250,000.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101204/ap_on_bi_ge/us_obama_4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. He has two choices I will wholeheartedly support:
sign a tax bill that reauthorizes lower and middle income tax bracket with no extension, temporary or otherwise, for the upper brackets or veto the whole thing.
Any other action he takes I will wholeheartedly oppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes, but...
How does he get option number one? I agree he needs to veto any bill that has tax cuts for the rich in them, those making over $250,000 but I see a veto as the only option without compromising with republicans to extend tax cuts for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Right. Then veto the whole thing and THEN let the law
which Bush signed sunset on its own. As all know, it is in the law itself to let the tax cuts GO AWAY on its own.

Then, in January, the Dems start middle class tax cuts with NO cuts for those above 250K.

The Dems have all the advantages. I hope they do not blow it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. You are going to be sorely disappointed...
Because a deal with the Republicans to extend all the tax cuts is going to happen.

As I've said before, everything else your seeing in the House and Senate is theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I fully expect to be disappointed
And will be loudly making my disappointment known when it happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Foe Sure
You can bet on it, he deal is already signed and sealed, just needs to be delivered... and that will happen in time to be christmas present for the wealthy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breadandwine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
45. Obama is a genius. The economy will go up in the next 2 years.


Once Obama caves to the Republicans they can say the economy went up because of THEM, not him.

This is a brilliant move by Obama......to help the GOP take over the Senate in 2012.


Brilliant!!!!!



There's a simple way to get Obama to remember he's a Democrat. If progressives on Capitol Hill told him that unless he started fighting for the little people and the Democrats that they would support GOP impeachment efforts, I guarantee Obama would start being a Democrat by Tuesday. The family feud would be over in a week. Obama may be able to deal with hostile Republicans if they go after him, but if Democrats went after him too, it would be too much. He'd have no choice but to remember who brung him to the party.


Of course, progressives won't do this. They are too busy helping Obama and walking around like deer caught in headlights. No one in the Democratic party has the guts to call Obama a Republican.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #45
52. OBAMA.... no longer FOR the people.... lost my vote months ago
i would be just as happy with a REPUBLICAN.... at least when they are fucking you they don't PRETEND TO GIVE A SHIT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Before he signs anything, it has to get through BOTH houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
39. i'm aware of that...I'm talking about what may potentially reach his desk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
danbee46 Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. I agree, but...
...I have no faith that he won't give the Repugs what they want.
Capitulation is ugly but it's turning out to be this president's m.o.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because Obama knows that he'll 'give in' to whatever he's asked for
It doesn't make sense to most Americans, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. there is no work to do.
do NOTHING. Let them expire then create a new bill next session that gives it back to the bottom 98%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That makes sense! So the politicians won't do it.....they need to create drama...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felinetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I agree. He should say "out of respect to Bush's wish to let the tax end after ten years, I will let
the clock run it out. "  Can you imagine what the Repigs
would say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Except next session, the house is controlled by the Republicans
It will be very difficult to get any bill passed then that doesn't give breaks to the upper income earners. My belief is give breaks only to corporations that create jobs here and base them on the number of jobs created. Other than that, no tax breaks for anybody...capital gains and dividends treated as direct income as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Roll up his sleeves and work with the congress. But this congress or the next?
:shrug:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. No, he meant roll over
on his back like a scared puppy that was just approached by a larger dog.

What a pathetic POS we have as a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. This reply is a typical chunk of stinky hyperbolic shit and you should be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Ashamed for what? He has PROVEN himself a weak President..........
........Jesusfuckingchrist, look at the health & financial "reforms", the military rolled him on the Afghanistan buildup, DADT, EFCA, fuck I'm getting of typing already and I haven't even named half of the shit he fucked up WHEN he had 255 Dems in the House and 60 in the fucking Senate. If you want to think this guy is the best thing since peanut butter you are entitled to your delusions I guess. By now after two years and a fucking tsunami in the mid terms if you think he is the liberal jesus I want the shit you're smoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radhika Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Whatever the Repugs Want - that'll be the deal n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. If he doesn't make a deal now, then the Republicans will just bring the issue up
again next year with their increased numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Some people need a first grade civics class. Only a compromise bill can pass the Senate. The Presi-
Edited on Sat Dec-04-10 03:22 PM by RBInMaine
dent is the executive. He doesn't make law. Congress does. Given Senate rules, there is no way to get a middle class tax cut bill, either re-newed or re-drafted, now or later, without a compromise that can get through a 60 Senate vote cloture procedure. Has anyone here ever had to actually govern anything? I have sat on numerous governing committees. On most issues, there is ALWAYS compromise. That is, if anyone living in the real world actually wants to get anything done. Try bitching less and governing more.

The best route is agree to no more than a two-year extension for all tax cuts attached to an unemployment insurance extension. If the R's go so far as to block that, THEN you tear THEM to shreds before a national TV audience, and the D's will WIN the day BIGTIME. But yes, of course a compromise must happen. It is called GOVERNING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. According to you, the only way Obama can govern is by 'compromising'.
Edited on Sat Dec-04-10 03:38 PM by COLGATE4
The question is, compromising with whom? Obama begins all negotiations by first compromising with himself, and when he's given it all away, he goes to the Rethugs who then extract a bunch of other 'compromises'. Remember that the Rethugs are the ones that defined 'bipartisanship' as 'date rape'. They mean it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Exactly. I for one am not interested in any "compromise" whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Maybe if he showed some leadership and used the bully
pulpit he would not have to (make a deal).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. When exactly was the last time the Republicans
compromised, or the Democrats didn't cave before the Kabuki dance began?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. No it isn't. It's called "getting fucked". In two years the Republicans.........
..........could "possibly" be in control of ALL three government bodies. Then what? I'll tell you what; the tax cuts will be made permanent. So fucking much for your "compromise".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Some people need a history lesson.
The democrats OPPOSED these tax cuts, because they were budget busters.

Republicans had to squeak them through in reconciliation.

This isn't a good time for ANOTHER dem flip flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Which is why the cuts should expire
Edited on Sat Dec-04-10 05:12 PM by eilen
And the Dems can "squeak" one through for the middle class with reconciliation.

Let the Repubs raise taxes on the middle class (HWB anyone?). Cuz it is over for Obama in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Thank you RB. The Senate and House have a lot to do with legislation, not just the President.
Edited on Sat Dec-04-10 06:25 PM by AlinPA
He has the veto in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stringertom Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
54. RB in Maine why u talk down to us
Take a civics class yourself! If it were in his nature to finally do what 53% of us elected him to do, he would take a stand and promise a veto of any extension including $250+K incomes. Once the ink dries, he then goes on the offense ID'ing Ole McConnell, Boehner and Cantor as the grinches who stole tax extensions for all solely for the benefit of the ultracomfortable. The sun will continue to rise in the East, water will freeze at 32F and we'll all be a little less in debt. As to cloture, it hasn't always been a 60-vote threshold and it's never been as overused as the 111th Senate has done to abuse the American people by effectively blocking the legislative process. For a change, he has an opening on how to beat their blocking game. Let the extensions expire for all unless he gets a bill excluding some level of the ultrawealthy. It was said state Sen. Obama was a pretty good poker player after hours in Springfield. If he would start calling GOP bluffs and blow them up for their toe-dragging vs. GM/Chrysler bail-out, financial reform, START treaty, unemployment extensions, all executive/judicial nominations etc. etc., then we would have a beginning of a truthful process that might pass as governance. You must think Santa is real if you believe GOPers want governance through compromise. They want it their way and for every Dem to hit the highway. That's the Godly Offensive Parasite version of government. Have a nice day when you decide to come down off your pedestal, RB. Some of us remember when Reagans & O'Neills got together for the benefit of the whole country. To paraphrase Lloyd Bentsen, "I knew Tip O'Neill and neither Boehner or McConnell are a Tip O'Neill".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Volaris Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
55. RBInMaine I have a couple of quick questions...
I think that the compromise solution you've put forth (in reality)is the correct compromise...but I want to ask 2 questions...
1) would you tie Unemployment Ins. to the Tax Cut extension for the same length of time..I.E., if the tax cut extension lasts for 24 months, does Unemployment Ins. last for the same amount of time? (cause that would rock=))
2) are you willing to acknowledge that IF this were to be done, then NO ONE that votes yes on it can make any reasonable claim to actually giving a damn about the size of the Deficit/National Debt for AT LEAST the next 2 years? (If so, thats cool, I just wanted to ask you which of those things you dislike less (not worrying about the level of long-term debt, vs. meeting the immediate need of re-instating unemployment checks getting mailed out ASAP...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. A deal..
Edited on Sat Dec-04-10 04:05 PM by sendero
...that capitulates to the Reps by including tax cuts to the rich which the nation can no longer afford. You can be sure of that.

I would rather the whole thing just expire than get that, so once again Obama will pull the worst possible outcome out of the hat and then claim it is some kind of victory.

It's laughable and pathetic at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eringer Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. OBAMA - JUST SAY NO!
DO NOT GIVE IN ON THIS ONE. I DO NOT WANT TO SEE RICH PEOPLE REALIZE A GAIN FROM THEIR INVESTMENT IN THE GOP. :puke: JUST SAY NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. You pass these spending increase, it is YOUR DEFICIT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. I draw the line at any compromise extension of the damn Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
I ain't interested in him "rolling up his damn sleeves". Just say NO! How about a little fortitude?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
30. Just let the ALL expire!
THAT'S fiscal responsibility!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. Maybe he needs to stop rolling up his sleeves and just say how it will be
...as in "I'll veto any tax bill that extends the tax cuts to the wealthy", and then go on vacation or something and let the 10% approval rated congress scrap it out. I think it would do wonders for the whole country if we didn't have the three-way shit storm that the Health care bill wound up being, between Obama and the Democrats and Repugs in congress. If he just said what he would accept and let them take it from there, that would be fine.

If he vetoed the bill and everything expired, I don't think that would be a bad thing at all. It would set the precedent that getting elected President means you actually get to decide how things are going to be once in a while, and they could always offset the extra costs to people with another stimulus package or something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. You know what? Americans would go along with that veto and IMO, they might just
blame the republicans for working for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. That's what I think too
...whereas the worst-case scenario is, again, Obama wades into another 3-way shit storm and comes up with a lousy compromise that nobody likes, but he is forced to agree to.

I think some distance from the legislative process, along with an ultimatum as to what he will sign, would be the best policy. Otherwise we probably end up with another piece of crap with his name on it...As far as PR wars, I'd have to admit he has everything to lose again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. IMO the sad thing is that people in this country would support the veto and the
Edited on Sat Dec-04-10 07:11 PM by AlinPA
Congressional Democrats and President don't beleive in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
51. Bingo nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
34. And that deal is? Caving...Giving in...Giving up...Backing down?
...take your pick.

I'll lay BIG odds that Obama will cave to the RushThugs.

It will be just another disappointment with the President.

IF I am surprised and it swings in favor of Dems and Progressives
then I'm VERY happy to say that I was wrong.

...I'm not holding my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicalmajority Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
36. Forget It If the Deal Is Extension for the Millionaires Too.
I'd rather see the Bush tax cuts expire completely so my tax rate as well as the millionaires' tax rates go up on Jan. 1, 2011.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
41. I feel like it's the dems in congress vs. Obama and the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stringertom Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
43. Roll his sleeves up, practice his signature and be ready for more vetos than the Gambino family
Somebody with video files of the '08 campaign, PUHLEEZE loop all candidate Obama's whistle-stop promises of rolling back the Bush tax breaks for the top 2%. Once it's looped, have the Thin Man and his new-found BFF Geithner strapped down ala Alex in A Clockwork Orange and forced to watch it until they grow a couple of pairs of cogliones and call every GOP bluff until the new Congress is sworn in. Financial Armageddon is coming down the express track at all of us unless someone stands firm in the face of the lunatic rich. Five years prior to the first Great Depression, Coolidge signed a GOP Congress' tax rebate from 46% max rate down to 25%. Rich got richer just like since 2001. See what happened? As Emma Bull has said, "Coincidence is a word used when we can't see the levers and pulleys". Start practicing your cardboard architecture. It'll come in handy soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
44. Well, duh. What he means is he'll give in/up and sign whatever piece of shit
Boner wants him to this month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lobodons Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. Obama is finally correct, there will be a tax deal alright!!
It is whatever the Republicans want after the Dems and WH cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
47. Obama said he'd compromise on a 2 year extension if it includes extending unemployment benefits.
Edited on Sat Dec-04-10 09:51 PM by BenzoDia
Since people think he shouldn't budge on tax cuts, I'd like to know how everyone expects him to handle both situations w/o a compromise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. hang the lack of unemployment benefits RIGHT AROUND THE FUCKING REPUKES' NECKS WHERE IT BELONGS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
49. Wait A minute... there is another option...
Sunset all Bush Tax cuts.... then raise taxes on those making 250k and above and give an even larger tax cut to the rest of us..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
50. I suspect that he will cave in on extending the entire
Bush tax cuts, at least for a period of time. He will use it as leverage to pass the repeal of DADT and extended UI and maybe the Dream act. He know the Pubes will do anything to keep those tax cuts and he is going for everything. He also knows he can't get the middle-class version through the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moostache Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
53. The only reason he has to roll up his sleeves is:
The Republicans told him to stop getting his sleeves in their soup while he is waiting on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PFunk Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
56. I also expect to be disaponted.
And will put my support into a finding someone to replace him as the Dem presidential candidate in 2012. As of this point the idiot's heading for one-termer status with a repug as out next POTUS.

Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James48 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
57. NO DEAL.
Let them expire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
58. Obama is treating Americans and the middle class like their idiots...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC