Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court to look at huge sex bias suit vs. Wal-Mart

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:11 PM
Original message
Court to look at huge sex bias suit vs. Wal-Mart
Source: AP

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court said Monday it will consider whether to keep alive the largest employment discrimination lawsuit in U.S. history, a case that claims Wal-Mart pays women less than men and promotes women less frequently. The justices stepped into a dispute that could involve billions of dollars in back pay for 500,000 to 1.5 million women who work or once worked at Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world's largest private employer. But the case also could affect other class-action lawsuits, in which people with similar interests increase their leverage by joining together in a single claim.

Wal-Mart, backed by many business interests, praised the court's intervention. "The current confusion in class action law is harmful for everyone — employers, employees, businesses of all types and sizes, and the civil justice system," the company said in a statement. "These are exceedingly important issues that reach far beyond this particular case."

Wal-Mart, based in Bentonville, Ark., is appealing a ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco that the class-action lawsuit could go to trial. The company says that allowing the large number of claims to go forward would set off an avalanche of similar class-action lawsuits in California and the other Western states overseen by the 9th Circuit.

But the lawyers representing the women who are suing Wal-Mart say there have been only eight such suits nationwide — and none within the 9th Circuit — since the first appeals court ruling in favor of the women nearly four years ago. "This threatened landslide of class-action litigation has not materialized," the lawyers said in legal papers filed with the Supreme Court.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_supreme_court_wal_mart_discrimination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fatbuckel Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope Wally-mart goes down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If this goes against them it won't even be a small bump in the road.
However they should lose.

As an aside, if there is anyone there who ever gets to see any of the Walmart Mob at any time ... say jogging alongside some road somewhere ... or dining in your restaurant ... or anything. Consider doing us all a favor and accidently pull the car over just enough to create road paste, or accidently drop cyanide into the deserts.

I would never advocate violence, but it would be more humane than the pitchforks and torches that are coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delightfulstar Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. They should lose on principle alone.
Walmart is one big equal-opportunity employment FAIL. They've been playing this unfair pay game for too long. Time for them to get their due. It may be a drop in the bucket to them, but it's something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cory777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Court to look at huge Wal-Mart sex bias lawsuit
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court will consider whether to keep alive the largest job discrimination case in U.S. history, a lawsuit against Wal-Mart that grew from a half-dozen women to a class action that could involve billions of dollars for more than a half million female workers.

Wal-Mart is trying to halt the lawsuit, with the backing of many other big companies concerned about rules for class-action cases — those in which people with similar interests increase their leverage by joining in a single claim. Class actions against discount seller Costco and the tobacco industry are among pending claims that the high court's decision might alter.

The suit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. contends that women at Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores are paid less and promoted less often than men. The case the high court accepted on Monday will not examine whether the claims are true, only whether they can be tried together.

Estimates of the size of the class range from 500,000 to 1.5 million women who work or once worked for Wal-Mart.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_supreme_court_wal_mart_discrimination



Activist News http://activistnews.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC