Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen.-elect (Rand Paul) on tax deal: I'm leaning against it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:28 PM
Original message
Sen.-elect (Rand Paul) on tax deal: I'm leaning against it
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 09:36 PM by Turborama
Source: CNN

Kentucky's Senator-elect Rand Paul says that if he were already in Congress he would lean against voting for the recently announced tax deal.

In an interview airing on CNN's "The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer" Wednesday at 6 p.m ET, Paul expresses strong opinions about the deficit, spending, and the tax deal proposed by President Barack Obama.

"The most important thing government can do right now for the economy is to extend the Bush tax cuts. I would be for extending them permanently...If you're going to extend and add new tax cuts, you should couple them with cuts in spending. Instead, we're coupling them with increases in spending and I think that's the wrong thing to do.

"So I'd be leaning against voting for it."

=snip=

Paul also believes that a divided government works better, and hopes this will benefit a proposal that he plans to bring to the floor of Congress when he arrives, stating "But when I get there, I'm going to propose a bill that will have $500 billion worth of spending cuts, because you have to start doing it.

Read more: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/12/08/sen-elect-on-tax-deal-im-leaning-against-it/



$500 billion? I wonder where that's going to magically come from... Are we finally going to see the Teahadists' mystery austerity measures they've been so purposefully vague about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. repuke whore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyperry2009 Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. He wants divided gov't? That's what we have with Democrats in charge.
Democrats vs. Blue Dogs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, we support Rand Paul over President Obama? Really tough
to isolate & rant issue by issue rather than evaluate the overall package.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Nobody
is supporting Rand Paul over Obama. Look at the reasons he gives for opposing this bill and its the spending in form on unemployment extension. Support him and you might end up getting just tax cuts for the top 1%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yep, he wants permanent tax cuts for the filthy rich
No-one here is ever going to support that.

Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Huh?
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 02:44 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. If he doesn't include defense spending in that package then he really is a fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, it will have to include defense cuts, for that is a significant slice of the pie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. And to think, I haven't even gotten to the funny part yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well once he's sworn in as a Senator I will give a shit
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. He won't be voting on it personally. He won't take office until next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bwah-ha-HAH!1 It's gonna be a ride with these a-hole/ T-Bagger/ Thugs n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unfortunately, he doesn't get to vote on it... (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. hahaha - he's unable to vote but he wants to still vacillate between positions

what a complete and entirely-unrefined joke he is

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcaudilllg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. I KNEW IT.
A hypocrite of the first order. He's nothing but a psychotic libertarian extremist who cares nothing about plugging the deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. he wants to plug the deficit alright
plug it with hard work of the middle class. Theres nothing wrong with plugging the deficits but it must come from the group who has benefited most from govt expenditure which we all know is not the middle class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good.
I support any vote against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Errr...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. $500 billion would be kill Medicare...
http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/17/federal-budget-spending-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html

In 2008, "we spent $456 billion on Medicare, and it is the fastest growing major government program. How likely is it that the people protesting Obama's Medicare cuts will stand with Republicans if they propose cutting that program even more to balance the budget? They will switch sides in an instant. The elderly will fight anyone who tries to cut their benefits even as they hypocritically demand fiscal responsibility and rant about the national debt. The elderly are the reason why we have a national debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
19. he can't vote on it, so he's just playing politics.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 03:25 AM by krabigirl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
22. Give flip flopper rand time to change his mind. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. They talk tough till they get there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC