|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Lars77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 04:48 PM Original message |
WikiLeaks 'rape' victims had hidden agendas ... and I've seen the proof says Julian Assange's lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think the charges were just so they could get him into custody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
14thColony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I fear you're right; that's what it seems to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 08:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
36. He'd never get to USAmerica... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #36 |
68. I think he's too famous at this point to make him disappear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #36 |
107. I think that the backlash for the sort of actions you suggest, ProudDad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I think you are right about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
25. That is my thought as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
59. Also, I think the charges were calculated to divide the left against him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #59 |
69. Seems they've been pretty successful. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:32 PM Response to Reply #69 |
140. I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:07 AM Response to Reply #59 |
84. .How very RW to use sex crimes (if that's what happened). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #84 |
139. I'm sure that's what the calculation was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #59 |
125. Really? Which Left Is That? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #125 |
138. I'm lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
102. And your evidence is....?????? OTOH, there is evidence of rape... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 09:44 AM Response to Reply #102 |
105. What, specifically, is the charge against him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #102 |
109. What is your source for the statement that "all Assange had to do to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tpsbmam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:28 PM Response to Reply #109 |
116. Not only that but the STD could come from someone else....taking a test for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidthegnome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:30 PM Response to Reply #102 |
121. There is no conclusive evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #121 |
129. well sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backtomn (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #102 |
122. Where are the "women's advocates" at DU ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #122 |
128. Because most of the women on this site have common sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 04:49 PM Response to Reply #128 |
130. so now rapists fit a profile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. My god are you corny. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 04:58 PM Response to Reply #131 |
134. you're the one profiling accused rapists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #102 |
127. Do we really have to suffer this batshit propaganda on this site of all places. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
114. exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. Cheney will come out of hiding for Torture Time now. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 03:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
83. Cheney will have to remain in this country in his undisclosed location. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pam4water (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. Did the women have a hidden agenda or did the government lock on to them once they came forward. May |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 07:09 AM Response to Reply #6 |
95. One has absconded to Palestine, the other is in hiding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. Blatantly appears he was framed to get him into custody. He will receive NO fair trail here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rozlee (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
8. They're still talking "he said--she(s) said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matilda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Swedish sexual assault laws seem to be the most peculiar in the world, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. are you fucking serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rozlee (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Actually, I think she's saying that by the woman changing her mind in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruperto31 (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. My GF is an anti-date rape advocate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 04:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
133. then she's not much of an advocate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matilda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:25 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Yes, I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rozlee (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Maybe I've misunderstood your comments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 08:10 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I stopped reading at "irregardless" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
psychopomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:47 AM Response to Reply #30 |
81. It may be unfair, but so did I, actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:07 AM Response to Reply #81 |
100. You feel compelled to post that, even if it humiliates a fellow DUer who wasn't being mean to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:10 AM Response to Reply #30 |
101. Please see Reply 100. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazzgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 09:31 AM Response to Reply #30 |
103. Oh my...I stopped reading at "irregardless" too, LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rozlee (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
120. I have a teabagger sister and her teabonics are getting to me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matilda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 09:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. I agree, there can be many reasons why a woman might change her mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 10:47 AM Response to Reply #28 |
111. The woman who says no under the circumstances you describe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:30 PM Response to Reply #23 |
57. Giving consent doesn't mean you consent to whatever the other person wants wants to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matilda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:10 AM Response to Reply #57 |
77. Under Swedish law, it's not necessary for anything else to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:14 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. I'm not talking about Swedish law. I'm talking about what you said. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:43 AM Response to Reply #77 |
93. Link re: specific Swedish statute, please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:03 AM Response to Reply #23 |
99. You're wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 10:44 AM Response to Reply #23 |
110. I think that whether sex was rape might depend on what happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rozlee (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #110 |
123. The Swedish laws on rape sound as confusing as American ones decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #23 |
132. really? you've never had sex go wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matilda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:53 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. But - wouldn't charge the man with rape. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. so you say 'no' and 'stop' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matilda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #136 |
143. I consider that consent given makes the woman at least partly culpable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertDiamond (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 10:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
47. +1,000,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:51 AM Response to Reply #17 |
66. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DWilliamsamh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:43 AM Response to Reply #66 |
74. There is a pretty big difference between Assange and Polanski |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #74 |
124. You sure put a lot of words into my mouth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DWilliamsamh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #124 |
137. I don't think you can search my past posts for teh Polanski issue but - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #137 |
142. Fair enough, it seems like we are more or less on the same page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DWilliamsamh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-14-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #142 |
144. I do think we mostly agree on a theoretical level |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:02 AM Response to Reply #17 |
67. Wow, you just jumped to a conclusion I don't think the poster was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:22 AM Response to Reply #67 |
87. Some point? Like a week later? If so, you're right. Otherwise, "stop" means stop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:27 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. I don't think that was the poster's point. If you do then, agree to disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:38 AM Response to Reply #88 |
92. Speaking of rushing to judgment,....my post said nothing about what the other poster meant or about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:43 AM Response to Reply #92 |
94. But you're replying to that post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 07:33 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Sorry, I an not following the phrasing in your post just before "Am I wrong?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:58 AM Response to Reply #17 |
82. It's rape if she says "stop" and he doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
56. You can't withdraw consent no matter what happens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:28 AM Response to Reply #56 |
90. Please read some of the other responses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:15 AM Response to Reply #10 |
85. Men "scorned" never do anything to anyone. So, using a sexist saying works well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:30 AM Response to Reply #85 |
91. Using quotes around "familiar phrasing" makes "points" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 07:40 AM Response to Reply #91 |
97. Ah, yes, using quotation marks around a very familiar quotation is very meaningful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well then, why not publish those "secret police documents" on Wikileaks??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. What makes you think that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. You're probably right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. You might want to go read up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I didn't say the documents should be off limits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. It would be inappropriate, and detrimental to his case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forty6 (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
41. Exculpatory evidence for Mr. Assange would be "inappropriate"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:26 AM Response to Reply #41 |
71. People have a right to privacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. They did screen them--and redacted info that could get people hurt. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. boring posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 08:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. This Really Pisses you Off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
58. Probably because they are material to his defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iandhr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
11. "But Mr Hurtig remains confident that Mr Assange will get a fair hearing in Sweden ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 08:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
37. He will never get to trial in Sweden... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iandhr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Sweden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:08 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. The case looks too weak to go to trial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. not at all, it is legal if the death penalty is not on the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vattel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
53. I wouldn't be surprised if Sweden doesn't prosecute Assange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:27 AM Response to Reply #37 |
89. This. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
12. It smacked of a stitch up from the outset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoapBox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:29 AM Response to Reply #12 |
72. Ditto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newtothegame (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
24. Sure Mr. Hurtig. You're right. All rape victims are liars. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyHawkAZ (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Where did THAT come from??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newtothegame (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 08:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I find the selective vetting of rape victims interesting, thats all. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Did you even read the article? Do you know what the accusation really is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 07:52 AM Response to Reply #32 |
98. Not sure what your point is. What you quoted, IF TRUE, describes two rapes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 08:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. There are NO rape accusations, that is a creation of the MSM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyHawkAZ (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
54. They aren't rape victims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
45. Deleted message |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
27. What a shocker! Someone's attorney says the other side is lying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 08:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. And that's he's got 'secret evidence' to prove it!!! Quelle Suprise!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forty6 (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 09:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. I thought Wikileaks was all about making "secret evidence" not so secret!... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 10:47 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Assange is exempt from the transparency he demands from everyone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #46 |
64. No ... Assange's lawyer is working for transparency ....read the article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #46 |
126. He hasn't demanded transparency from me...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
50. Did you read the article? He could be disbarred for releasing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #50 |
60. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:40 AM Response to Reply #60 |
65. If Assange were abusive with women and 39 and active |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 10:32 AM Response to Reply #65 |
108. And it came at a very convenient time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:29 PM Response to Reply #108 |
117. The first woman, Ardin, seems to have a lot of turmoil in her life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:57 PM Response to Reply #42 |
63. It is...that's why his lawyer wants to release it ...but would be disbarred for doing so.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:07 AM Response to Reply #42 |
76. Deleted message |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
62. Nonsense.... Assange's lawyer is trying to get permission to relate the evidence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
31. K & R nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
39. They're not the only ones. Many here on DU appear to have agendas of their own... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forty6 (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 09:27 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. My only agenda is to get as close to the truth as possible, be it about .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:23 PM Response to Reply #39 |
55. I've been trying to figure that one out, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boudica the Lyoness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:21 AM Response to Reply #39 |
70. Many of them were pro TSA porn scanners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azureblue (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
44. The "charges" are based on the complaints |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vattel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:04 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Ardin was "working with the CIA as an agent/activist"? Sure she was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:12 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. She was deported from Cuba for associating with a State Department front group. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shining Jack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:15 AM Response to Reply #51 |
79. +1 She sure did. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vattel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 11:16 AM Response to Reply #51 |
113. lol, sounds less sinister now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. She's probably not, she doesn't seem smart enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
61. Encouraging ... but I'd really like to know how many cases like this have actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:35 AM Response to Reply #61 |
73. Accused but not even charged at the time the red notice went out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HEyHEY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
75. How can you be raped by a website? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 09:50 AM Response to Reply #75 |
106. Rotten.com. I rest my case. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shining Jack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
80. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 06:18 AM Response to Original message |
86. Not surprised at all. One appears to be an agent for intel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
104. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Love Bug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
112. I'd say both sides are highly motivated to discredit the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
118. charges to just get him in custody--no shit?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. I don't believe he's been charged yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
141. So leak the documents already! Why the delay exposing the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC