Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top Marine: Soldiers could lose lives if ‘don’t ask’ repealed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 07:40 PM
Original message
Top Marine: Soldiers could lose lives if ‘don’t ask’ repealed
Source: APF


General James Amos, commandant of the Marine Corps, cited a Pentagon study saying Marines fighting in Afghanistan were worried that permitting gays to serve openly could disrupt "unit cohesion."

"When your life hangs on a line, on the intuitive behavior of the young man ... who sits to your right and your left, you don't want anything distracting you," Amos told reporters at the Pentagon.

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/top-marine-soldiers-lose-lives-dont-ask-repealed/



Forget about the freaking enemy bullets flying over us...!!! We are under attack by teh gays..!!!!!! Turn on your gay-dars... I repeat, We are under attack!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Marines used to say the same thing about people like Obama nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sad but true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. You mean lawyers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. No, he means people of color
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. Yeah, we just can't think of enough groups to hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I really can't think of anyone whose opinion on this issue I value less............ nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. there are no homophobes in a foxhole...
to quote a famous aphorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hey, Commandante...why not say instead that the gay marines in harms way right now are still marines
How about "affecting unit cohesion" that way, assclown.

Marines are good in a fight, never been a fan of the jarhead culture.

sgt pasto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. If he is so afraid that Marines can not control their sexual urges
then he should declare that all Marines are confined to base, including all the way through Generals.
Need to protect the American population from these sex crazed Marines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanelorn Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. So they finally found one guy to oppose the repeal of DADT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. You must have missed the testimony - the Army and Air Force
Chiefs of Staff also said to wait. The Chief of Naval Operations said go ahead and repeal.

Of course if you don't want to know what they think, don't call them as witnesses and don't put them under oath,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
41. OMA. Oath, my ass. The ones who oppose it make up the flimiest bs reasons.
Nothing, but nothing has been said to support making gays in the military lie. What's been said may, to a bigot, justify keeping gays out of the military entirely.

But no one with half a brain, even Amos, can truly believe troops are better off looking to their right or their left, as long as the know that the man or woman on one or both sides of them may be a closeted gay.

So, I repeat, OMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Seeing as over 55% of frontline combat Marines oppose DADT, I think you need to go tell them
they don't have half a brain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's time for General Amos to retire. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
49. You do know he was hand selected by the Obama Admin, right?
First time there has ever been a non-infantry officer as CMC.

If you don't want the CMC's opinion, don't ask for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Makes you wonder why the DoD opened the USMC for females then.
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 08:27 PM by Lost-in-FL
Aren't females in combat "distraction" enough for marines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Mr. Amos.... Fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahampuba Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. carte blanche
... but neo-nazi's serving with non-aryan enlisted is just fine.
the dont ask dont tell isn't applied to bigots or racists with their doctrines of hate.
pathetic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Spoken like a man who's never been on the firing line himself?
I had a hunch that he's never actually had to look to "your right and your left" while in combat, and I was right... he's never actually been in that situation. He's an aviator, not infantry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
39. This crap is about who's a neo theo, not who's been in combat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sounds like this "Top Marine" has some issues of his own.
Plus....I do believe a bullet kills exactly the same no matter who pulls the trigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
40. Clearly, his issues are bigotry and abuse of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Although women are not in direct combat,
there are many in combat areas. What has prevented the wild sex orgies or persistent random gropes? Do they think so little of U.S. soldiers that they don't think they can control their sexual urges or behavior?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Sadly, many female soldiers are raped and harassed
SNIP- Some soldiers and commanders show their hostility by undermining women's authority, denying them promotions, or denigrating their work. Others show it through sexual harassment, assault, and and rape (of which there is a shockingly high rate in the military). These problems occur throughout the military, on US bases all over the world, as well as at war.

In 2003, a survey of female veterans found that 30 percent said they were raped in the military. A 2004 study of veterans who were seeking help for post-traumatic stress disorder found that 71 percent of the women said they were sexually assaulted or raped while serving. And a 1995 study of female veterans of the Gulf and earlier wars, found that 90 percent had been sexually harassed...

The military's retrograde attitude towards rape gets even more sinister. More female troops have died in Iraq of non-hostile causes than have been killed in battle, and several of those deaths have either been labeled suicides or been left unexplained by the military. Four of those women had earlier been raped, and at least sixteen others died in such suspicious circumstances that retired Army Colonel Ann Wright and Congressman Ike Skelton have called for Congress to compel the military to reopen the cases and investigate, so far to no avail.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103844570
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. But not because males are unable to control themselves.
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 07:55 AM by No Elephants
When the law discriminates against any group, it emboldens assholes and, in their minds, justifies theit violence. And women have been discriminated by law around the world. almost as centuries as gays have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. the military does have very high rates of females being raped.
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 09:22 PM by provis99
something like 1 in 3 are raped. So I would indeed say male soldiers are not interested in controlling their sexual behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rozlee Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. When I left in 04, it had gotten worse than I've ever seen it.
Sexual harassment was bad when I was in during the 80s. Then, things started improving as sexual harassment classes and zero tolerance policies started being instituted. But, it broke down immediately once we were in theater in Iraq. And when I say immediately, I mean as if someone had thrown a switch. After I left, my daughter remained behind for three more tours and where her safety was concerned, I think she actually had less to worry about from the Fadayeen Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChumbawambaFan Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
42. Another non issue 'threatening the troops safety' nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
36. "Nor interested in" and "not able to" are very different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. Actually, you would not believe the stories about what happens in theater in terms of consesual sex
happenings. It is an issue that is routinely dealt with but the military doesn't like to talk about it.

Not that it's a shock considering you have young men and women ages 18 to 23 living in close proximity to each other and dealing with life and death situations everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. what a fucking moran....
i always thought a marine was a marine and nothing more.

ya the guy has some issues he does`t want to explore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. Who appointed this asshole, anyway? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Mabus/Gates' pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Here ya go....
From Wikipedia.org

Amos became the 31st Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps on July 3, 2008.<3> In June 2010, Amos was recommended for nomination by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to succeed James T. Conway as Commandant, while recommending Joseph F. Dunford, Jr. to fill his role as Assistant Commandant.<1><4> He was formally nominated by President Barack Obama on July 20,<5> who interviewed him for the job on June 17.<6><7> He received support from the Senate Armed Services Committee during a confirmation hearing on September 21,<8> and confirmed shortly thereafter. On October 22, 2010, Conway turned the position over to Amos at a ceremony at Marine Barracks, Washington, D.C.,<9> thus breaking the tradition of the Commandant being an infantry officer.<1><4>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Your 1 and 4 point to the links I posted....
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 10:28 PM by boppers
Ah, wikipedia!

edit: subjects strip gt and lt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
52. This was an Obama/Gates pick.
Mattis is not press friendly, Allen was seen as too close to Petreaus, and Dunford is too young. Amos was the default pick at that point.

He is basically holding down the fort until Dunford can take over.

FYI - I doubt Dunford's opinion on this matter will be much different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. I was Army...and we used to say...
USMC was "Uncle Sam's Misguided Children"...seems to fit.

There is absolutely NO difference in persons ability to fight..or get wounded or killed in combat because of their sexual identity. It was bullshit during the Revolution and bullshit throughout history right up to today...and will be bullshit in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. So now teh gay is responsible for Marines losing their legs in a war zone??!!
What. The. Fuck.

This guy needs to be shitcanned. Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
29. Gee, I thought the Marines are supposed to be the
tough guys...and here they are - afraid of getting hit on by another Marine? Are they afraid that saying no will hurt them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
30. and under DADT/a bigoted environment gays lose their lives by their own hands n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
31. What news! Top marine admits he's a whiny cry-baby.
He's sort of tarnishing the image of the marine as the bravest and best we've got in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
32. Yes, Canada's military is being wiped out left right and center cause of it
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 02:12 AM by HEyHEY
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
33. Sounds to me like he's suggesting that the foxhole buddies might put a bullet
In an openly gay marine in the same foxhole. I submit that openly gay marines are not going to be any different than they are now, they just don't have to worry about being "fired" if their sexuality is discovered. It seems that people who are against the repeal have not taken the time to really THINK about what they're saying before they say it. They also haven't taken the time to educate themselves about "teh gay."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
37. Amos is a transparent, lying POS.
If troops are that homophobic, wouldn't they also be in danger just from wondering if the person in the foxholw with them was a closeted gay or not? The only solutio to Amos's problem is to keep gays out of the military entirely, not to make them live a lie.

Besides what about the lives keeping DADT in place ruined? What about troops going nuts and dying because DADT discharges added to their tours of duty? What about gay troops worrying about a homophobe being emboldened by Jim Crow laws against gays?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
38. This is ridiculous. Booga! Booga! Booga! Be afraid of the gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
43. Who knew Marines were such flamin' --
titty-babies? :shrug: :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
44. Dear General Amos
Tell your boys to "suck it up"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ratty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
45. Last line of his Wikipedia entry
He is a born again Christian

Quelle surprise. I'm sure that had nothing to do with his honest evaluation of the impact of the end of DADT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. Seeing as wiki can be edited by anyone, I'd hold off on believing that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
46. Seems to me that a soldier who is more concerned
Seems to me that a soldier who is more concerned with the sexual orientation of the other men in his unit than of the unit objective should find another line of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
48. Didn't people say basicallly the same thing before Army units were desegregated?
I believe they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
50. Hey General Anus - maybe we need someone in your position who knows how to COMMAND
because you just admitted that you don't know how to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Bullshit. The man was asked his opinion and gave it.
If given the order to end DADT, Tamer will carry it out to the best of his ability.

Don't confuse opinion with disobedience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. I didn't say or think that it was disobedience
He takes commands (after being able to weigh in on them) and is supposed to execute them

He admitted that he can't do that. Time for another General, we have plenty of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Like I said: Bullshit.
Tamer will execute the order to end DADT if ordered to do so. And I have no doubt that he will do it to the best of his ability. Trust me, Tamer has spent plenty of time arguing for one thing or another, only to have his CO go a different direction and still expect him to carry out those orders. The fact he is CMC shows that he can do it.

As far as having plenty of generals: Really? OK, please tell me the Marine general who should take over for him. There was a reason Tamer was picked as the first non-infantry CMC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
54. Soldiers will lose lives as long as this Neanderthal is the head of the Marines!
I guess he doesn't get that honesty makes Marines BETTER!

Who appointed this nut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC