Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Snowe Pledges Support For 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal Putting Senate One Vote Shy Of 60

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:15 PM
Original message
Sen. Snowe Pledges Support For 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal Putting Senate One Vote Shy Of 60
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 06:17 PM by t0dd
Source: TPM

Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) pledged her support for the standalone bill to repeal the military's Don't Ask Don't Tell policy this afternoon. Cloture to pass a repeal as part of the defense authorization failed by a mere 3 votes last week.

Snowe was among several theoretical supporters of repeal who said she voted against cloture because of procedural issues: Sens. Scott Brown (R-MA) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) objected to the time allotted to debate the underlying bill; and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) said that the timing for repeal was, in his view, not quite right.

Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) said, on the other hand, that she'd missed the vote because of a dental appointment. So, with Snowe's support, repeal supporters are within 1 vote of cloture -- and a repeal of DADT.

Read more: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/snowe-pledges-support-for-standalone-dadt-bill.php?ref=fpa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good!
and who will filibuster?

ASSHOLE JOHN MCCAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EarlG ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. If they get 60 he can't filibuster
And if they get to 60, the bill will pass and DADT will be dead and gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, there's a reliable vote for decency.
Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting--I thought Reid had bungled this thing last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That was the DREAM act which DADT repeal was just a part of.
This is a standalone measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Good...still, I will never understand the way the Senate works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Whoops I bungled that, TX4Obama is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Last week the DADT repeal was attached to The Defense Appropriations bill. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. No - it was the defense appropriations bill that included it
The Dream Act was separate and it was tabled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. I screwed that up. The 2 above this post are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. No biggie. We all screw up from time to time :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. She' Says a lot, But Hardly Ever Keeps her Word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Quick!
Somebody measure her nose between before she said that and after she said that. If it's longer, she's lying again. She's liable to go either way even though she said that. Won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. a fucking dental appointment?
I hope that is bullshit to fuck with repukes heads and she shows up. Lotta lives and serious civil rights hanging on some muckety muck's dental appt - can't that be postponed? jeebus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. She was 3 mins late; she intended to make the vote
and asked to be on record as supporting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPNotForMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Plus she's a co-sponsor of the standalone repeal bill.
And Reid basically surprised everyone by having the vote when he did last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Reid didn't tell her ahead of time that there'd be a vote. Not her fault. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. root canal
they last how long they last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. When is the time right, Sen. Manchin? Ten years from now? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Senate Republicans that I believe will vote 'yes' are....
Olympia Snowe - Maine
Susan Collins - Maine
Scott Brown - Massachusetts
George Voinovich - Ohio
John Ensign - Nevada
Lisa Murkowski - Alaska

Because they have all stated publicly within the past month that they support the repeal of DADT.
And now that it is a standalone bill not attached to the Defense Appropriations bill,
they are more likely to 'quickly' vote 'yes'.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. So at THE very last second, who will change and vote No.
...how much money are the Haters going to funnel to some loser senator,
to get them to vote no.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsrealBissel Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. Please God, let this pass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPNotForMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. ABC is reporting Murkowski WILL vote for standalone DADT repeal
http://tinyurl.com/28jqa9h (see update at bottom). This is encouraging because it's not a vague statement of support for the concept of repeal, but a pledge to VOTE for repeal. This should, theoretically, seal the deal....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC