Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Judiciary Committee Approves Medical Malpractice Liability Reform Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OneAngryDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 02:56 PM
Original message
House Judiciary Committee Approves Medical Malpractice Liability Reform Bill
Source: Healthcare Assoication of New York

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee voted 18-15 along party lines to approve H.R. 5, the Help Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act. The bill, introduced by Representatives Phil Gingrey (R-GA) and David Scott (D-GA), would cap non-economic compensatory damages at $250,000, establish a statute of limitations for filing medical malpractice suits, and limit attorneys’ fees in health care lawsuits.



Read more: http://www.hanys.org/news/?date=2011-02-18



They are trying to take justice out of the hands of a jury of our peers, and firmly placing it into the heads of Government and the insurance lobby.

And they are going to do it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tort Reform?........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Limit attorneys fees? Do you know how expensive it is to present
evidence to prove medical malpractice? The plaintiff doesn't have that kind of money and often neither does the law firm.

And $250,000 non-economic compensatory damages? If a child is permanently damaged by a surgeon, how long does $250,000 last with all the expenses that child will require to humanely live?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I assume a prevailing plaintiff can still get costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. They've already done it in my state. Lawyers don't want to
touch medical malpractice cases because of it. All it does is allows the doctors that are lousy to continue to injure/maim/kill innocent people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eringer Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. More BS Legislation from the Republican Machine (with Blue Dog Buddy Scott)
The following is taken from http://blog.oneillaw.com/blog/

The Republicans have just introduced HR 5. (Ok, it’s been called “bipartisan’ because some guy named David Scott, a Democrat from Georgia, is a co-sponsor. Scott is a blue dog Democrat, i.e., a Republican who caucuses with the Democrats. Make no mistake, this is a GOP bill.) It styles itself as a bill “To improve patient access to health care services and provide improved medical care by reducing the excessive burden the liability system places on the health care delivery system.” This is so called malpractice tort reform.

HR 5 is virtually identical to a bill by the exact same name (HR 5) that was introduced in Congress in 2003. Anytime a bill is introduced in Congress, the Congressional Budget Office conducts a study and prepares a report on the economic effect that the bill will have if passed. The CBO has not yet prepared its estimate for the 2011 bill, but it did prepare an estimate for the 2003 bill. I’ve saved a copy of it here (http://www.oneillaw.com/hr5ec.pdf).

The idea behind the bill is this: the cost of malpractice lawsuits (initiated by unprincipled and greedy trial lawyers, of course) is unreasonably and unnecessarily burdening the health care system, making it more expensive, and more inaccessible, for the rest of us. So, you would think, malpractice reform would lower the costs of health care, and that would benefit all of us.

How much money would malpractice reform save us? That is exactly the kind of question that the CBO report answers. In the case of the 2003 bill, the CBO estimated that the savings to the entire health care system, over a ten year period, would total $14.9 billion dollars, or an average of $1.49 billion a year.

That’s a lot of money, right? No, it’s not when you’re talking about the entire nationwide health care system. The current U.S. population is about 310 million, so that savings works out to a whopping $4.81 per person, per year, or just over a penny a day. 1.3 cents per day to be exact.

It is true that a penny saved is a penny earned, so before we scoff at this savings, we should at least take a look at what we are being asked to give up in return for this 1.3 cents per day. The signature feature of this bill is to cap damages for pain and suffering at $250,000. This of course is ridiculously inadequate, because medical malpractice can cause catastrophic injuries. Here’s a description of the injuries from a botched delivery:

“Doctors ultimately determined that Stephanie had sustained periventricular leukomalacia. As a result of that damage, she suffers spastic diplegia. She cannot control her legs, and her right arm is nearly useless. She is also wheelchair-bound, and she cannot perform most daily living tasks.”

So under HR 5, Stephanie, who will be wheelchair bound for her entire life, should only receive $250,000 (minus attorneys’ fees) in compensation from the doctor whose negligence is responsible for this condition? So that we can all save 1.3 cents per day? No thanks, I’m not interested.

Actually, the joke that the GOP seeks to play on us is even more cruel. That 1.3 cents savings does not go into your pocket. It’s a “trickle down” savings. Here’s how it works: the medical malpractice insurer saves the money, because instead of paying Stephanie several million dollars in damages for her horrendous injuries, it only has to pay $250,000. In theory, the insurer then reduces its insurance rates, and in theory the doctors and hospitals reduce their charges because they are paying less for malpractice insurance, and in theory the health insurance companies pay less for medical care because the doctors and hospitals have reduced their rates, and in theory the medical insurance companies lower their premiums because they are paying less to the doctors and hospitals, and in theory your employer pays less for medical insurance because the health insurer has reduced its premiums, and in theory your employer gives you a raise because it is paying less for your medical insurance.

And if you believe that the 1.3 cents is ever going to trickle down to your pocket, I know of a bridge that you can buy with that savings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh goody. More fuck the have-nots at the behest of the haves legislation.
If this is actually enacted, it is a huge "FUCK YOU" to patients harmed by malpractice. Just one more fuck you to the people. How predictable these days -- the only thing that would surprise me is something really for the people passing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young but wise Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Elections matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Leadership matters even more.
If Obama had inspired rank-and-file Democrats, if he had conducted an economic policy that favored ordinary people, not Wall Street billionaires, Democrats would have won by huge margins in November.

Obama inherited a massive mess from the Bush administration. But he did far too little to win the trust and confidence of ordinary American voters. Meaning -- the mess we are in now is strictly and entirely Obama's fault.

I think a Democrat will win in 2012, but that Democrat will not be Obama.

That Democrat will be a pro-union, pro-ordinary person Democrat. Someone willing to take the lead and take progressive ideas to the White House. IMO, Russ Feingold could be that Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young but wise Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Obama/Biden 2012
Keep dreaming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Somehow, elections of Rethugs seem to matter a bit more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. $250,000 is peanuts if your life is ruined
and you can;t walk, can't work and require round the clock medical attention.

That money would be gone in a year.

Well, this is all for show anyway. It won't get 51 votes (much less 60) in the Senate and will never see Obama's desk. Hence that's why he pretends to favor so-called tort reforms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nossida Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. You can bet
this 'reform' is based on what is best
for the Insurance Companies.

Insurance Companies = Ponzi Scheme.
Republicans will in all cases rule
against the Individual, and in favor
of the Corporate entity.

This drivel is what passes for politics.
America has become an Oligarchs Paradise.
and it is republicans that facilitate the
sellout. Being soulless sellouts themselves,
it just comes natural to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. After years and years of watching politics very closely, I have come to
the conclusion that Republicans are just mean people.

They aren't as mean as terrorists, but . . . . they are very mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost
for doctors and Insurance cos.

Same law already in Ohio and Texas and our consumer cost for doctors and insurance is the same as other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-11 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Medical malpractice insurers must be very happy.
Edited on Sat Feb-19-11 08:53 PM by No Elephants
People who need their left arm amputated, but get their right arm amputated by mistake, not so much.

I'd like my docs to be stiared silly of making a mistake and of doing something to me without my informed consent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneAngryDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-11 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC