Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman's Nine-Month Pay Cost Declines to $292,836 Per Employee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 07:59 AM
Original message
Goldman's Nine-Month Pay Cost Declines to $292,836 Per Employee
Source: Bloomberg

Oct. 18 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. set aside $10 billion to pay employees in this year's first nine months, down 24 percent from the same period last year as revenue slid and the firm cut jobs.

The compensation expense, which includes salaries, bonuses, stock awards and benefits, was equivalent to $292,836 for each of the company's 34,200 workers as of Sept. 30. A year earlier Goldman Sachs employed 35,400 people, who shared about $13.1 billion, or $370,706 each, for the nine-month period.

Goldman Sachs is among firms that have been targeted by lower Manhattan protests, called Occupy Wall Street, that seek to call attention to the income disparity between the wealthiest 1 percent of the population and everyone else. Related demonstrations took place on four continents over the weekend. Sixty-seven percent of New York City voters support the movement, according to a Quinnipiac University survey yesterday.

Goldman Sachs, which set a Wall Street pay record for a securities firm before converting to a bank in response to the financial crisis, may cut compensation for the second year in a row as declining markets sap trading revenue. After setting aside 39 percent of revenue for compensation in 2010, the company has allocated 44 percent of revenue for pay and benefits so far this year. Revenue for this year's first nine months fell 25 percent $22.8 billion.

-snip-


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/10/18/bloomberg_articlesLT9GDZ07SXKX.DTL



This is still an obscenely high average compensation.

And note that with revenues slipping, they're just allocating a larger share of that revenue for pay and benefits, most of which of course will go to top management.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. awwww, those poor workers taking such a big pay cut
:nopity: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. how did Bloomberg put it?
he said they were "scraping by", or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. They probably did it by cutting the janitors pay
and leaving the execs alone. But then I'm a cynic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. and that's just for 9 mos.---annually it's $390,448
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. thanks for that post - I was working on the math of it also
:grrr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Poor things
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
They_Live Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deceptively written "sympathy" piece
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 10:19 AM by They_Live
averaging the total for all employees. As if to say, "see, they don't make that much money".
How much of that amount is going to the CEO, etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. How much for Admin Assists. and Mail Clerks?
I bet no where near that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. i have a friend who worked at boa`s mailroom
just above a minimum living wage for new york city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. I hardly think most of the workers are getting that. Megamillions go to their top 1%, too.
Most employees are part of the 99%, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. My thoughts too
It also however a fact of life , sad as it may be , that in the absense of the 1% the other 99% wouldn't necessarily be there in total.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's official: we live in the Matrix.
We're supposed to feel sorry? I'm not! :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. So true, which pill do you choose, that is the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. THE IGNOMY!! THE INJUSTICE!!! THE OUTRAGE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Time for DU to take up a collection!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redixdoragon Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's likely these numbers represent the mean average
Not the median average.

It's like taking a bar where you've got a bunch of say grocery clerks, making at best 20k a year. Bill gates walks in and suddenly the average income of all the patrons of the bar is $1,000,000 a year.

If pay is going down it's likely the compensations are dropping for those at the bottom to middleish areas. The top fights tooth and nail to grow their income. It's a pathological obsession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. These folks should try to live off of a nurse's pay-after Scott Walker
ramps up his nickle and dime operation... Pay more of your own insurance-check; Pay more of your retirement-check; rating your earned sick hours to be worth less-check; mandatory time off-check; losing earned vacation hours if not used up-check. By the time Scotty has nicked and dimed those first responders... they have monies for food and shelter and not much else..... Plus no bonuses and other luxuries these candy asses expect.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. The IRS describes the top 1% as making 350,000 or more a year.
Sachs is one of the parasites that must be destroyed to make this country whole again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC