Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.N. Torture Chief: Ban Solitary Confinement for Teens, Mentally Disabled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 02:08 PM
Original message
U.N. Torture Chief: Ban Solitary Confinement for Teens, Mentally Disabled
Source: Demcracy Now!

U.N. Torture Chief: Ban Solitary Confinement for Teens, Mentally Disabled

The top United Nations official on torture is calling for an end to almost all forms of solitary confinement. Juan Méndez, the U.N. special rapporteur on torture, said solitary confinement should only be allowed in exceptional cases, and emphasized an absolute ban in the case of juveniles and people with mental disabilities.

Juan Méndez: "I am of the view that juveniles, given their physical and mental immaturity, should never be subjected to solitary confinement. Equally, in order not to exacerbate a previously existing mental condition, individuals with mental disabilities should be provided with proper medical or psychiatric care, and under no circumstances should they ever be subjected to solitary confinement. My recommendations are, first, to see if we can have a complete ban on prolonged or indefinite solitary confinement. And I more or less arbitrarily define that as anything beyond 15 days of solitary confinement, meaning someone being confined to a cell for at least 22 hours a day."

In his remarks, Méndez also commented on U.S. soldier and alleged whistleblower Bradley Manning, who’s being held in a Kansas prison following his arrest for allegedly leaking government material to WikiLeaks. Méndez says although Manning is no longer being held in solitary confinement, he is still monitoring the case.

Juan Méndez: "I want to stress that, on the one hand, he is no longer in solitary confinement, although he spent something like eight months in solitary confinement, but when he was moved to Fort Leavenworth, his regime changed, and he’s not in solitary confinement now. I’m not saying anything about whether his present regime violates other possible standards, but at least he’s—on a daily basis, he does communicate and socialize with other inmates in his same category."



Read more: http://www.democracynow.org/2011/10/19/headlines#8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. the top whazit on whazit?
Good luck with "advising" the US on how they handle their prisoners. They have gone to the dark side with Cheney and aren't coming up into the light again anytime soon, no matter who is in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Speaking of which, I wonder if Bradley Manning's had a hearing yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I suspect Mr. Manning is mulling over a plea. Thus his attorney is not complaining
about his hearing date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-11 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Right after the UN bans (effectively) teens and mentally from ever
being a danger to a guard or another prisoner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wow what an evil response to a well reasoned argument against torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Equating solitary to torture is the evil argument - but I forgive you
anyway.

How many raped and/or murdered convicts would have been spared if the attacking prisoner had instead been isolated? But you're probably right - the lives of prisoners may not be worth someone else being put in solitary. I happen to believe their lives are worth more - but I'll cede to your twisted logic.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nope, you were arguing against stopping the torture of children and mentally handicapped
That is what the OP is about.

If people actually gave a damn about convicts and wanted to help them then we wouldn't be using solitary confinement on kids as a solution.

If we treated our prisoners like people rather then animals then convicts would be far safer. Not to mention that attacks by convicts are a lot less frequent then attacks on convicts by guards.

All of the problems you point out have been solved by the Dutch in their prison system far better then anything tried here in America. In the end humanity is always better then torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC