Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arnie cuts Golden Gate's guards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CShine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 06:34 PM
Original message
Arnie cuts Golden Gate's guards
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has withdrawn National Guard protection from the Golden Gate Bridge in a cost-cutting measure. His decision comes after the federal government withdrew the $5m annual funding for the operation last year. Troops were stationed on and around the bridge after 11 September 2001, as the landmark was considered a prime target. The decision to remove them, however, angered the agency that runs the famous American landmark.

Marie Currie, spokeswoman for the agency, said: "We are definitely not happy with it.For two-and-a-half years they were an integral part of our security on the bridge."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3668537.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. ruh roh - and so nice of them to announce soft targets
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. As someone who has often seen those utterly useless guardsmen
at the GGB, I say this is a good way to save money. Honestly, some guy sitting in a humvee at the end of the bridge is going to be able to stop a terrorist from blowing up the bridge? Utterly pointless. Most of my SF friends feel exactly the same way, thought that's not a scientific survey...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DAGDA56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I crossed the border from Arizona into California...
...back in January, and the fruit inspection station was empty. I wasn't sure when this happened, but I remember them being really picky in years past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Just more budget woes...
Permission for use is granted, however, credit must be made to the California Farm
Bureau Federation when reprinting this item.

www.cfbf.com/agalert/2003/10_15_03_c_aa.aspx

Budget woes close 11 of state's border inspection stations

Issue Date: October 15, 2003

By By Kate Campbell
Assistant Editor

All 128 employees in the California Department of Food and Agriculture's border
inspection unit have been notified they're on the "120-day surplus staff list" and are
subject to layoff. In addition, the department said it will close 11 of the 16 border
inspection stations.

Since 1922, employees at the stations have stopped vehicles coming into California to
check for fruit, vegetables and livestock, to prevent damaging pests and diseases from
entering the state. The stations have long been viewed as an essential barrier to invasion
by damaging pests and organisms.

"These actions are being taken to meet the 16 percent General Fund reduction mandated
by the Legislature," said CDFA spokesperson Steve Lyle. "Cuts to the red imported fire ant
program that have already been announced also are part of these reductions."

He said the current cuts in staffing and programs do not reflect the additional 20 percent
cut in funding that the state Department of Finance has announced for January 2004. All
state departments currently are going through program reviews to determine where and
how further cuts will be made.

"Currently, we are in the 16 percent mode in terms of the reductions that are actually
being executed," Lyle said. "Like all state agencies, we had to take a 16 percent General
Fund cut and a 12 percent special Fund reduction in response to the Legislature's budget
passed in August. The cuts are going to continue to come at a very deep level."

Two years ago, the border inspection unit had a budget of about $10.3 million. Currently,
the budget is about $8.9 million, but will be reduced by an additional $4 million. That will
make the final budget $4.9 million. That funding level does not reflect the 20 percent cut
in funding that will follow in January.

As a result of the closures, the only agricultural inspection stations remaining open will be
at Yermo on Interstate 15; Vidal, I-95; Truckee, I-80; Needles, I-40; and Blythe, I-10. Lyle
said about 80 percent of the vehicle traffic entering the state passes through these
inspection stations.

Prior to the announcement of these most recent cuts, Lyle said CDFA had already
eliminated seasonal inspection workers and, beginning about three months ago, private
passenger vehicles were no longer inspected.

The Pest Exclusion Branch keeps dangerous plant pests out of the state and stops or
reduces the spread of newly arrived pests or diseases. The branch operates inspection
stations along California's borders to screen vehicles for unwanted pests.

Large shipments entering by land, sea or air are inspected at unloading and transfer sites
within the state. The branch also manages programs for nursery crops, seeds and cotton
to ensure that quality standards are met and provides a certification program for
exporters who want to ship pest-free agricultural products to other states and countries.

The costs to manage and eradicate recent pest infestations and disease outbreaks have
been considerable. For example, the recent Mexican fruit fly quarantine in San Diego
County cost state and federal governments about $22 million. If red imported fire ants
were to become established throughout California, experts have estimated the cost of
treatment and control would be between $387 million and $989 million per year.

The Southern California quarantine for exotic Newcastle disease cost more than $160
million and resulted in the depopulation of 3.16 million birds, including destruction of 21
commercial flocks.

Permission for use is granted, however, credit must be made to the California Farm
Bureau Federation when reprinting this item.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They are semi-useful.
I saw one of them picking up trash under the bridge.

At least this guardsmen wasn't a complete waste of resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. If bush won't pay for it stop it. Same with no child left behind stop it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh well, it's just "F*gs, Ch#&ks, & Hippy-Dippies..."
Edited on Wed Apr-28-04 08:18 PM by Dr Fate
Not good. I dont suppose the Feds could give us a hand on this, eh Terminaaaa-toor?

Since you are so close to Bush, how about asking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Uh-oh ...
I remember reading that the heightened security was lifted at the WTC a few days before the attack. I believe they even got rid of the bomb-sniffing dogs. This can't be good. :scared:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hmmm...has Arnie got a little October Surprise plan going
with the rest of the Crime Family? Maybe Marvin Bush will take over security for the bridge like he did for the WTC before it blew up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, then, we all need to remember this, don't we?
Edited on Wed Apr-28-04 09:55 PM by calimary
WHO is it - who's cutting the funding for this? Of WHICH political party?

And WHY? Because we can't get supplemental Homeland Security funding from WHERE? From WHOSE administration? Of WHICH political party?

Anybody wanna connect the dots? Let's make sure we remember this. So we remember who needs to be held accountable. I, for one, am all for keeping score...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Today L.A. was hysterical over "credible" Mall threat
Big stink and warnings, yet GG bridge is now vulnerable? What gives, all the National guard is in Iraq so "Homeland Security" takes a back seat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC