MOST RECENT NASDAQ RALLY FUELED BY TRIPLE Q ACTIONIs Something Fishy? About three weeks ago, it looked as if the Nasdaq was going to break the neckline of a complex head and shoulders pattern to the downside. That would have resulted in technical damage too much for a world of chart watchers to ignore and not act upon by selling. But at the very moment when it appeared as if the Nasdaq was in severe technical peril,
an apparent large buyer of the QQQ index stepped in and saved the day. As is usually the case when a head and shoulders neckline is whipsawed, this was followed by a sharp and tradable rally. Tonight I would like to explore this recent trading action in depth. Is there a defensible “conspiracy theory” affecting recent market action?
Speculative Nasdaq Leadership Now Lags Larger Nasdaq StocksThe war rally off of the March 2003 low was led by the more speculative names within the Nasdaq index. As shown in the long-term chart below, a comparison of the relative performance of the entire Nasdaq (which includes the smaller and more speculative names) to the Nasdaq 100 (or $NDX which includes only the largest 100 companies in the Nasdaq) indicates that the entire Nasdaq outperformed the largest 100 from the March of 2003 to late January of 2004 apparent top. This is in sharp contrast to the late 1990’s timeframe that led up to the March 2000 bubble top. At that top, the Nasdaq 100 had leadership, and then it lagged after the market topped and then plunged. Now, as illustrated in the chart below, the ratio’s 50 day has crossed the 200 day moving average to the downside, indicating that the more speculative Nasdaq names are now lagging the Nasdaq 100.
The Rule of Alternation suggests that the market usually doesn’t act the same way two times in a row. Can the Nasdaq continue its rally with its leadership coming from its “blue chips” as it did prior to March of 2000, or will we need resurgence in leadership from its smaller speculative stocks for the rally to continue? Or (as I think) is the Nasdaq rally on its last legs? Let’s look at some more recent comparisons of the Nasdaq 100 to the total Nasdaq.
-cut-
Finally, note that the Nasdaq 100 trades in a liquid fashion via the index-traded Amex-listed QQQ shares where over 110 million shares typically trade in a single day.
The trading in the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ-shares) has been disproportionately high compared to the volume of the entire Nasdaq over the last few weeks. Is this an aberration, or is there some other fundamental reason why this is occurring?
Is Something Afloat?Am I suggesting a “conspiracy theory,” or is the trading action on the QQQ’s just an aberration? Does the market suddenly favor index funds more so than it did just a few weeks ago, or are the Q’s merely a trading vehicle for organized market manipulation? Can markets be manipulated over the short, intermediate, or even long term? Are they being manipulated now?
http://www.financialsense.com/Market/wrapup.htm