Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Naval submarine Jimmy Carter christened

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:27 PM
Original message
Naval submarine Jimmy Carter christened
Saturday, June 5, 2004 · Last updated 3:48 p.m. PT

Naval submarine Jimmy Carter christened

By DIANE SCARPONI
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER


GROTON, Conn. -- Former President Jimmy Carter was filled with emotion Saturday as the most advanced nuclear submarine in the U.S. Navy was named after him at a Connecticut shipyard.

"This is a very wonderful day for me, to see my wife break the champagne on undoubtedly the finest and most formidable ship in the world," said Carter, a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and the only submariner to be elected president.

Carter's wife, Rosalynn, blessed the Seawolf-class nuclear submarine and its crew, then hesitated for a moment before cracking the bottle of champagne against the sail of the USS Jimmy Carter.

Amid much fanfare and cheers, a crowd of 4,500 Navy personnel, submarine workers and their families gathered at the Electric Boat shipyard for Saturday's christening ceremony. The Carters' daughter, Amy, also attended the ceremony.

more
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apus_story.asp?category=1110&slug=Carter%20Submarine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Congratulations, Jimmy!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I want a USS Bill Clinton
Just to piss off the manly military types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. submarines are cigar shaped
lol, it would be ironic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #29
62. AND ... they always go down! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow! Go Jimmy Carter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's a BIG sumbich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. That's an understatement
hats off to all of you subs- you're a special breed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
51. Ever see an Aircraft Carrier in drydock?
way bigger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #51
57. They just look bigger on television...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. well that could be the case too but I worked on the USS Constellation thru
drydock and it is bigger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yay! Congratulations President Carter!
As the wife of a nuclear submariner, I am happy to see this day come!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. FINALLY.... very appropriate. We're proud of you, Jimmy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sannum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why this is a happy surprise
May God bless her, and all who sail in her:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hate to be a wet blanket, but...
As much as I want to honor Carter in general, and for his firing of Admiral Rickover ::spit:: in particular, I still dislike to see ships named after living people...

Oh well, at least there's another sub out there to share the load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. he fired him???
pay back is a bitch..if i remember carter served under Rickover. i think carter really didn`t like him during that time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Nobody liked Rickover...he was overbearing, egotistical, and...
...thought he answered to no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
60. Machines of death
Edited on Sun Jun-06-04 09:12 AM by JoFerret
I agree with the naming after living people. All politicians are controversial figures. Imagine having to serve in the US Ronald Reagan! Or the USToyBoat The George W. Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sporadicus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. A Fitting Tribute
to a great president and former Naval officer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Jimmy was a vet; a submariner.
He served honorably, unlike bush* who ducked out before his time was up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. or Ronnie
don't forget the great communicator making 'training films'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. And then Ronnie worked with McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover....
...to turn people in that they believed were "communist sympathizers". They ruined quite a few good people in the film business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #31
61. Ronnie wore the clothes but
Edited on Sun Jun-06-04 09:11 AM by JoFerret
that's about all. Like GWB he liked to play dress-up and cut brush. Like GWB he ducked to chance to actually serve. And WW2 was the so-called good war. Unlike GWB he rode a horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. lol! a classic freeper comment......
He fought for what was right---in the name of peace, not war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. You're going to have to try a little harder...
Jimmy Carter may have been badmouthed, but he wasn't a poor President at all. He's one of the more enlightened people we've had in that office.

...where'd THAT rant come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. what the fuck are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. It will make sense if you can
bother to educate yourself about Carter's background and career. He had the backbone and intelligence to gain respect in the world unlike the man who has put this country behind the eight ball, George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. by the way, Jimmy Carter was a US Marine unlike Bush who went AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Carter was a Naval nuclear officer
IIRC he was a submariner, explaining why they named a sub, not an aircraft carrier, after him.

If they build a USS Bill Clinton, I'd like for it to be a frigate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Carter Was Smart Enough To Be On A Nuclear Sub
only the cream of the crop get there.

And when Three Mile Island happened, Carter actually UNDERSTOOD what was going on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Carter has a degree in nuclear engineering
from Union College. For a moment, just imagine what it must be like to slog through those textbooks and get a real handle on it all.
Unlike our current anti-intellectual occupant of the White House, who was given a free ride by those sycophants in the Ivy League.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Very well said!!!

Excellent.

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. His skill and diplomacy brought hostages
back alive though crdit was given to the new president, on as the return was on Inaugaration Day. Ironic ,isn't it, that Carter didn't take credit for what came to fruition mere minutes after his watch was over, and Bush continues to blame Clinton for events transpiring years after he has left office? Carter was a classy guy and a naval officer. His IQ is rated the highest of any of the twentieth century presidents. The appellation "ignorant ass" with no backbone would more correctly be decriptive of the current idiot awol occupent of the White House. And, oh, yes, Dumbya also likes puppies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. Carefully-Nourished Right-wing Lies About Carter
People who choose to believe right-wing lies about James Earl Carter's alleged "spinelessness" would do well to acquaint themselves with Christopher and Annette Drew's book Blind Man's Bluff: The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage (NYC: Harper Collins, 1999). President Carter, for all that he might have been more foresightful in Afghanistan and Iran, had a fairly aggressive anti-Soviet espionage campaign going on. He did not short the US submarine forces.

As it turned out in subsequently declassified Soviet archives, the Soviet Army's troopers weren't 10 feet tall after all. The weapons programs that Ray-Gun boasted about had had their start in the Carter White House. In retrospect, many of the weapons programs cancellations Carter made still make strategic sense. The B-2 is a hideously expensive aircraft without a mission since the end of the Cold War, and the same can be said of the B-1. The cruise missile programs, supported by Carter, have proved invaluable in the war against the Taliban and against the genocidal Milosevic regime in the Balkans.

James Earl Carter was a President who was a lot better than many of us gave him credit for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Sporadicus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. I Propose That No Nuclear Submarine Be Named After *
until he can pronounce 'nuclear.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. It should be "USB Jimmy Carter"
Edited on Sat Jun-05-04 06:43 PM by TahitiNut
A submarine is not a 'ship' but a 'boat.' It's disappointing to hear Jimmy call it wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. A submarine is a boat because.....
...the Germans from WWI made it so? Das Boot! Or is it not a ship because the U.S. Admiralty could not fathom naming a vessel without an exterior deck and bridge a ship? Wait till the military brings out an underwater aircraft carrier. What will that be called?

Don't laugh, rocket planes are here already, just have to figure out how to retrieve them underwater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. He knows. He's just speakng civilian.
He headed the Navy crew that helped build the Seawolf, the second nuclear sub (Nautilus was first).

Besides, it's just hard to call anything that looks like the pic in post #4 a 'boat'.

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
40. Boat is a nickname for a submarine.
Submarines are considered ships, not boats. See chapter 12, "Naval Ships and Aircraft" of the BMR (Basic Military Requirements) NAVEDTRA 12043, or Chapter 13 "Ships and Aircraft" of the Bluejacket's Manual. The BMR in it's glossary defines 'boat' as "A small craft capable of being carried aboard a ship", and defines a ship as "Any large seagoing vessel capable of extended independent operation".

In the sailing era 'boat'traditionally meant a small vessel rowed by oars and without sails. In other words, boats are intended for short trips, whereas ships have the storage capacity for an extended voyage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rppper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. submariners call subs "boats" because it's......
....a submarine navy/surface navy thing...nothing more, nothing less...and it does have some history in the German navy, as they were known as "undersea-boats"....

when a typical sub is moored pier side, you are only seeing about 1/10th of the boat, the rest being underwater. modern subs typically outweigh their surface counterparts.....example...a modern Burke destroyer weighs about 8400 tons, while the USS Jimmy Carter weighs around 9200 tons submerged. an Ohio class missile sub weighs in at 18,800 tons submerged and nearly 560 ft long, making them the heaviest warships in the navy next to the aircraft carriers.

look...a picture of carter underway and serving, unlike the current resident...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. Yup. The 'weight' of anything submerged is equal to the 'weight' ...
Edited on Sun Jun-06-04 12:21 AM by TahitiNut
... of the displaced water. If it weighed less, it'd float (like a ship or surface boat). If it weighed more, it'd be called the Thresher. :dunce:

Two years at the US Coast Guard Academy (across the Thames from Groton, btw) taught me that there're two kinds of "boat" - watercraft that are carried aboard a "ship" and submarines. I learned that from a boatswain named John Paul Jones. (ISYN)

:scratching head: I'm kinda surprised nobody mentioned Electric Boat and why it's called that.




It's too bad this somewhat playful post got taken so deadly seriously. (sigh) Oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
45. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Now that's a ship I'd be proud to serve on. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. What a coincidence! It happened on the same day his successor died.
???????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. Two wrongs don't make a right
I think naval vessels used to never be named for the living--maybe I'm wrong, but that's my recollection. A sub called the Carter doesn't make up for a ship named the Reagan. It's a corrupt practice.

But Americans want things NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. maybe there are too many ships
and all the dead heros are spoken for?

Here's a link to a site outlining the protocols and background on naming military ships. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/names.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. That changed a while ago. Aircraft Carriers used to be named
for sea battles, Submarines for "denziens of the deep" and Battleships for states.

Now we have Subs named after Cities (which used to be cruisers) subs named after States, subs named after people, Carriers named after people, alive and dead, and God knows what else.

The Navy changes it's naming conventions to meet various demands. Funding from Congress for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
53. Precognitive Newsflash! Here's the USS George W. Bush!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. You know, I could have sworn it was this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
54. great, Carter deserves it
he is a veteran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
55. A wonderful and poignant honor for President Carter!
...being an early nuclear submariner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
58. Imust have missed the daylong CNN coverage of the speeches
and the whole ceremony like when George HW Bush had a ship named after him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
59. Christened??
...that's unfortunate!
However, if anyone deserves his own naval naming Carter does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC