Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds Want More Alaskan Land for Drilling (387,000 more acres)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 06:11 PM
Original message
Feds Want More Alaskan Land for Drilling (387,000 more acres)
ANCHORAGE, Alaska -- The federal governments wants 387,000 more acres available for oil and gas drilling in Alaska, a proposal criticized by environmentalists. The move announced Wednesday is part of a proposed Bureau of Land Management amendment to a 1998 development plan for the northeastern region of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

Environmentalists said the plan would endanger lands rich in sensitive wetlands and wildlife habitats.

But Henri Bisson, state director for the federal Bureau of Land Management, said the expansion is necessary and would increase potential reserves from 600 million barrels to 2.1 billion barrels.

"We believe we've picked the right course," he said.

Originally, 87 percent of the 4.6 million acres in the region along the state's North Slope was to be made available for oil and gas development leases. The new plan would open about 96 percent.

more..................

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-alaska-oil,0,5415810.story?coll=sns-ap-nation-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IA_Young_Dem Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. When will people wake up and realize that we need more alternative energy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom-mad-about-bush Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force "scheme to pay off Oil Co. buddies"
People do know we need more alternative energy. But we can never get it without cooperation from the government, and the government supports the oil companies, because they are big GOP donors. Between 1999 and May 2001, 18 energy companies donated over 16 million to the Republican Party. From January to May 2001 over 100 representatives of the energy industry companies and corporate associations were consulted by Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham for advice on the "Energy Task Force". No consumer groups or environmental groups were contacted.

The following is taken from the book "50 Reasons not to vote for Bush"
With regards to Dick Cheney's "Energy Task Force" pg. 158
"Greg Palast called it "charitable" to describe the plan as a "scheme to pay off the president's oil company buddies, fry the planet, and smother Mother Earth in coal ash, petroleum pollutants and nuclear waste." The Cheney scam dismissed alternative energy sources and focused on promoting oil, gas, and nuclear power (sources in which Halliburton is heavily invested). Besides weakened environmental regulations and the potentially disastrous push for drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge, Cheney called for a new power plant to be completed every week for 20 years - over a thousand."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustFiveMoreMinutes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. What about offshore drilling? Florida comes to mind...
... whatEVER happened to THOSE plans?????? coff coff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. how many times
do we have to say no?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Smash and grab
before they are spent packing in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is a short-term solution that will accomplish little...
but further destruction of the environment.

We need conservation and alternative energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. 387,000 more acres in small plots spread over 10,000 square miles?
These people can't stop lying, cheating, and stealing. Any assumption that this acreage would be contiguous is very probably a false assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC