Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel Gripped by Battle Over Baby Boy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CShine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 02:32 AM
Original message
Israel Gripped by Battle Over Baby Boy
JERUSALEM (AP) - Israel's attention has been gripped by a legal tug-of-war over a baby boy - likened by a newsaper to a quandary worthy of a King Solomon. Everyone from rabbis and entertainers to ordinary people weighed in Sunday on whether the 13-month-old should stay with his adoptive parents or be returned to his biological mother, who wants him back.

A newspaper commissioned an opinion poll. A rabbi noted that Jewish law gives preference to the biological parents. Others brought King Solomon into the mix. As told in the Book of Kings, Solomon suggested a baby be cut in half to satisfy claims by two women, both of whom insisted the infant was hers. When one woman insisted he be spared, the king awarded her custody because she showed she truly loved the infant.

"Solomonic Decision 2004," read a headline in the Yediot Ahronot daily.

The biological mother has said she only realized in her eighth month that she was pregnant and at the time was separated from the child's father. She gave up the child for adoption, but changed her mind when the boy was 3 months old. A Tel Aviv court is considering the case. All participants have remained anonymous to protect the child.

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBX3KA5GVD.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. What the fuck are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Circumcision would be my guess. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I was circumsized
It wasn't mutilation. You nip the tip, as Mel Brooks once said.

Personally, I think it looks better this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Do you think women look better with their clitoris circumcised too?
Just wondering. Here's some well researched information for others who don't hold your point of view.

http://www.nocirc.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Male circumcision is different than female genital mutilation.
Any attempts at equating the two are misguided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PylesMalfunction Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Give me a break!
Edited on Mon Jun-14-04 10:43 PM by PylesMalfunction
If I have a son, I won't get him circumcised. Having said that, trying to equate it with female circumcision is such bullshit. The equivalent of female circumcision would be like cutting the entire penis off. So please get off your biased high horse. :eyes: Trying to say that it's similar to female circumcision is a slap in the face to any woman who's had to undergo this horrible procedure!!!


Edit - the least invasive form of female circumcision would be like cutting the entire penis off. I'm not even going to try to equate a male version of having all of your external sex organs cut off and then being sewn shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Those sort of cases are always sad...
The baby's 13 months old now and the family's bonded. After reading a report in Maariv, even though Israeli law is probably on her side, I don't have a lot of sympathy for the biological mother, who doesn't really seem to be thinking of the best interests of the baby...

http://www.maarivintl.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=8422

She seems to not want the baby when the father's not in the picture, then want him back when the father's around. Also, how does someone not know they're pregnant that late in a pregnancy?


Violet...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Surprising twist in "Baby X" case
http://www.maarivenglish.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=8550

<snip>

Biological mother is Christian, adoptive mother is Jewish; By law, child must be adopted by parents of same religion

"A surprising revelation in the "Baby X" case: This evening it was discovered that the baby's biological mother is Christian, while the child's adoptive parents are Jewish. By law, a baby cannot be adopted by parents of a different religion.

Yesterday in court, privileged information regarding the adopting family was revealed. "Our estimate is that in light of the new information, the adoptive parents will withdraw their appeal", said the lawyer representing the biological parents.

However, the adopting family said that it will continue the fight to leave the baby in its custody. Their lawyers even announced they intend to release the privileged information in the coming days."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC