WP: SCOTUS Dismisses Pledge Case on Technicality

[Southpaw Bookworm]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40279-2004Jun14.html

The Supreme Court preserved the phrase "one nation, under God," in the Pledge of Allegiance, ruling Monday that a California atheist could not challenge the patriotic oath but sidestepping the broader question of separation of church and state.

At least for now, the decision -- which came on Flag Day -- leaves untouched the practice in which millions of schoolchildren around the country begin the day by reciting the pledge.

The court said atheist Michael Newdow could not sue to ban the pledge from his daughter's school and others because he did not have legal authority to speak for her.

Newdow is in a protracted custody fight with the girl's mother. He does not have sufficient custody of the child to qualify as her legal representative, the court said. Eight justices voted to reverse a lower court ruling in Newdow's favor.

[Heddi]

1. dupe

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x621405

[Jabbery]

2. This is actually good for Democrats

This ruling on a technicality robs the right wing of another wedge issue to bring out their base. Let the SCOTUS decide this one later, perhaps after Kerry is re-elected.

[Moderator]

3. Duplicate topic, please discuss here

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x621405