Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Considers Replacing Tenet More Quickly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 09:58 PM
Original message
Bush Considers Replacing Tenet More Quickly

WASHINGTON, June 21 — The White House is actively debating whether to act this summer to select a permanent successor to George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, who is scheduled to step down on July 11, Congressional officials and others involved in the discussions said Monday.

John McLaughlin, Mr. Tenet's top deputy, was chosen earlier this month by President Bush to take over as acting director. But Mr. Bush is now reconsidering an earlier plan to leave Mr. McLaughlin in place through the November election, the Congressional officials and others said.

Among those being mentioned within the administration and in Congress is Representative Porter J. Goss of Florida, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Mr. Goss, 65, served for about 10 years as a Central Intelligence Agency case officer, beginning in the early 1960's.

(snip)

Mr. McLaughlin is highly regarded, but White House officials have said a central motivation for keeping him on is to avoid a confirmation battle in the Senate this summer. Now, however, people involved in the discussion say that plan is being revisited out of concern that a failure to select a permanent successor may be both a practical and political mistake.

One hypothetical situation reportedly being discussed within the White House is how Mr. Bush would be perceived by the public if there is another terrorist attack against an American target before the election and an acting intelligence chief is still in place.

more…
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/22/politics/22INTE.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uhhuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Porter Goss...hmmm.
Edited on Mon Jun-21-04 10:10 PM by uhhuh
" Rep. Porter Goss said Thursday that the uproar over allegations that White House officials purposely identified a covert CIA agent appears largely political and doesn't yet merit an investigation by the House Select Committee on Intelligence, which he chairs."


http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2003310030460

Goss on other issues:

http://www.issues2000.org/FL/Porter_Goss_Civil_Rights.htm

Can you say, HARDCORE NEOCON?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds political
The Democrats cannot afford to be seen as stonewalling the appointment of such an important position during the "War on Terror" just before an election. It's a 2002 propaganda home run for the Republicans all over again.

The Legislative Branch must have pushed for this showdown. Looks like the Republicans get their man in the CIA for awhile.

Sorry. Is that tin foil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ah, but look on the bright side...
...confirmation hearings for a CIA director will allow an opportunity for Dems to drag a whole lot of Bushco failures before cameras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's a long list
Do you think they'll have time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That would be true if we had an "Opposition" party,
But we don't ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. They have no desire for a divisive confirmation fight over
Porter "Coverup" Goss. I don't believe the senate Dems would allow this vote to happen, even if it required a filibuster. McLaughlin is in until, at least, the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC