Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eight US soldiers among 17 killed in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:33 AM
Original message
Eight US soldiers among 17 killed in Iraq
BAGHDAD: Eight US soldiers and nine Iraqis were killed in continued violence across the country on Monday. Insurgents gunned down four US service members west of Baghdad.

A videotape delivered to Associated Press Television News showed four Americans in uniform lying dead in what appeared to be a walled compound in Ramadi, 100 kilometres west of Baghdad. One of the Americans was slumped in the corner of the wall. The bodies had no flak vests, mandatory for US troops operating in contested areas, and at least one was missing a boot. One fieldpack was left open next to a body as if the attackers had looted the dead before fleeing.

Brig Gen Mark Kimmitt, coalition deputy operations chief, confirmed the killings but gave a few details. He said that a US quick reaction force found the bodies after the troops failed to report to their headquarters as required.

Separately, four US Marines were killed in action in Al-Anbar province, the US military said. "Four US Marines assigned to the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force were killed on the 21st of June in the Al-Anbar province conducting security and stability operations," a spokesman said, reading a statement. The Marines never reveal details about how their troops are killed.

http://www.hipakistan.com/en/detail.php?newsId=en68507&F_catID=&f_type=source

posting this article from a Pakistan site because it is the only one which added up all the deaths today. It has been confusing trying to figure out what today's human cost was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. If you've been keeping track, I've never seen this attack clarified
who the '21 people' were? Soldiers, Special Forces, civilians...? The story quoted 'an Iraqi couple' were among those taken to a hospital but never even remotely hinted to who the others were.

---------------------------

Rocket Strike On U.S. Base In Iraq - CBS

A rocket slammed into a U.S. logistics base near the city of Balad on Wednesday afternoon, killing two U.S. soldiers and wounding 21 people, the military said.

Fourteen of the injured were taken to the U.S. Army's 31st Combat Support Hospital and seven were treated at a clinic on the U.S. base, known as Camp Anaconda, according to a military statement.

Balad is 50 miles north of Baghdad.

The rocket attack follows a series of incidents this week targeting Iraq's infrastructure and the civilians working to repair it.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/02/24/iraq/main541815.shtml

MSGOP (same story no new info)
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5225026/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, this source from China said those 21 wounded were soldiers
There was some confusion between whether 21 or 23 were wounded, but two difference may be that Iraqi couple you mention. Since the military doesn't count Iraqi, that should clear up the difference between the 21 and 23 counts.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-06/17/content_1531559.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's amazing you found this source! I can't believe the Western Whore
press, especially American, can't clearly publish what happened. It seems to me even the Chinese version plays with words. It's not really clear if the 'others' were military and from which nation. And if it were 21 American soldiers wounded and 3 dead total of 24 in one hit that this would have been bigger news than the very little coverage then disappearance this story got.

Thanks a bunch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. What in freaking hell....???!!!????
I'm completely confused. I've remained in this state since this insanity began. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. 'BRING EM ON" shouted the AWOL CHIMPANZEE
Edited on Tue Jun-22-04 06:50 AM by saigon68
and "Bring it On" did the Iraqi Resistance.

Its a Guerrilla War.

A few here a few there

Day after day

Week after week

Month after month

Year after year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. LOL! (and worrying a bit for our GIs).
Edited on Tue Jun-22-04 01:33 PM by Redleg
Iraq will turn into our Afghanistan. No, wait- we already have our Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. actually, it is 10
Edited on Tue Jun-22-04 02:42 AM by Aidoneus
4 in Ramadi (discovered in a video sent to news orgs by the resistance, shown abandoned and stripped of much equipment and confirmed by Kimmett), 4 from the 1MEF in "Anbar province" (the Marines never elaborate anymore, though that's usually officerspeak for some attempt to re-enter Fallujah and being blasted for it), 1 in a mortar attack in north-central Baghdad (not sure which suburb, with that description it is either in the 'Sunni' resistance base of Azamiyah, or 'Shia' neighborhoods of Kazimiyah or Madinat al-Sadr--all basically no-go areas for the occupyers), and 1 died just outside of Baqouba of wounds inflicted on Friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. The 4 in Ramadi ARE the 4 Marines
This is just about the sloppiest piece of journalism I've ever seen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. oh..
Edited on Tue Jun-22-04 01:33 PM by Aidoneus
I've seen them described seperately elsewhere, not just here. That would be 6, then, or technically 5 from the day with one 'carryover'. If the Marines weren't so damn tightlipped about things, the sort wouldn't be a source of confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. The CENTCOM press release says ar-Ramadi
That's cuz we already know. Otherwise it would say "in al-Anbar Province" like it usually does (ar-Ramadi is, of course, in al-Anbar province).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I stand overwhemingly corrected
Centcom itself is quite clear about it this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Sorry for the hyper-correction
I've been trying to keep careful track, and I think posts like these can be sloppy and confuse people. My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. s'ok
Edited on Tue Jun-22-04 02:45 PM by Aidoneus
being as accurate as possible is a good enough reason.

Now shut the fuck up and go away. :) (didn't get to say that yesterday, don't want to feel left out..)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patth Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Senate Backs Ban on Photos of G.I. Coffins
What are the names of the 7
democrats that voted with the Republican majority?



Senate Backs Ban on Photos of G.I. Coffins
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

Published: June 22, 2004

WASHINGTON, June 21 - The Bush administration's policy of barring news photographs of the flag-covered coffins of service members killed in Iraq won the backing of the Republican-controlled Senate on Monday, when lawmakers defeated a Democratic measure to instruct the Pentagon to allow pictures.

The 54-to-39 vote came after little formal debate, with 7 Democrats joining 47 Republicans to defeat the provision.

Two Republicans, Senators Olympia J. Snowe of Maine and John McCain of Arizona, voted in favor of permitting news photographers to have access to Dover Air Force Base in Delaware, where coffins containing the war dead from Iraq arrive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. One of the Dems was Mary Landrieu, my senator
I sent her a blistering email. I can't believe these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. We currently have (+/-) 846 dead US soldiers.
When will it reach 1000? What's the magic number, or is there one? At what point do even the callous American public say, "Enough!"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. http://www.icasualties.org
This website lists all casualties and injuries from the war and is updated daily. Is so disheartening...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Strange, ain't it? They couldn't WAIT to get Raygun's
flag covered coffin out there and fly it all around the country and show if off on several days, eh?

Well, of course, he's IMPORTANT!

Fuck these disrespectful wasters of human lives!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Hi patth!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. Shit, now I'm confused again
I know they don't want to report casualties this month, I feel like I'm being flim flammed, it's this many, no it's this many. Dazed and confused seems to be the sop, my count was 848, but now I don't know. Personally, I believe we passed 1000 a long time ago, they've hidden the bodies, using enron accounting.
I thought that people would start to take notice at 500, and a few did, I don't know if any more people will wake up at 1000, it takes casualties on a mass scale to get people to notice anything.
They must be to busy thanking gw* for the .25 cent reduction in gasoline over the last month.
Fuck you gw mcchimp* may you burn in your born again hell with all the oil you and your henchmen steal.

Welcome to DU Patth, I wish it were under happier circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Here's where the HiPakistan article gets it (deliberately?) wrong
The four "soldiers" killed in Ramadi ARE the four Marines killed in al-Anbar province. Same four people. This article pretends like these are two different incidents. They are not. It is the same incident. The article writer is being deliberatelky duplicitous about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. I saw a crawl on CNN this morning....
that said over 900+ were killed. What to believe.???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG: 4 dead in Ramadi = 4 Marines
"Separately, four US Marines were killed in action in Al-Anbar province..."

A straight out lie. The four Marines killed in al-Anbar province are the same as the four servicepeople killed in Ramadi. It is the same incident, not "separate-ly" as this artiocle falsely claims. Just a straight up and obvious lie by the article's author.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. I am not surprised they took the body armor
That must be tactically valuable, although woe to the Iraqi resistance that is captured by marines wearing it.

Also, checking the field pack may be considered looting, but isn't this also fairly standard procedure to identify unit of the enemy casualty or any other military intelligence that may be useful. After all, we usually hear about ID, or the lack of it, on Iraqi bodies after a U.S. strike.

It seems odd that a marine group would consist of only 4 people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC