Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just heard an Expert on CSPAN say that there was no political division

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 08:02 AM
Original message
I just heard an Expert on CSPAN say that there was no political division
Edited on Wed Jun-30-04 08:18 AM by sam sarrha
in California.. that the Swatz had ended the partisan polarization between the parties.

i am from Ca but living in TN.. i cant believe that.. unless the media isn't reporting it...

Can people in California give some feed back about this new peacemaker..??

is the Swartz really on his way to being a senator...???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nope. He'll go down with the Chimp.
If only the transcripts from his meetings with Enron during the energy crisis would come out. The press protects him like they do the rest of the Republican knuckle draggers. You would think they learned their lesson about putting a twit in charge of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's Because He Has Borrowed A Ton Of Money To Smooth...
over problems, for now. The problem with using borrowed money to pay today's bills is that you have to pay tomorrow's bills as well as pay back the borrowed money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. If you mean the State Party organizations ...
This is sorta true, they have both really sucked up to
Ahnuld and things are "mysteriously" cooperative up in
Sacramental. But out here in voter land, not much has
changed. This next election will be very interesting to
watch. It's clear that there is an effort underway to
diffuse the inter-party animosity, with the goal of getting
the grass roots to go back to sleep, and of returning
California to its historical sleepy conservative bent.
After decades of Reagan, Duckman, Wilson, and Davis
California is moving firmly to the left at the grass roots,
and it is upsetting national political calculations.

In witness of this claim, examine the gay marriage and
medical/recreational pot issues, and consider the number
of cities that have legislated against the "Patriot Act".
There is rebellion out in the great unwashed masses and
it's driving the "leaders" bonkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. This really isn't LBN, but are you being sarcastic?
You're calling David Brooks an "expert"? LOL. I heard him say that....I don't believe him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. I am worried about Arnold
Arnold has tremendous star power and unlimited access to money. He has complete control of the state government through a combination of charm and intimidation.

Some lawmakers are flattered by his attentions, and all are afraid of his threat to personally campaign against any legislator or group who opposes him.

Every lawmaker knows what would happen if Arnold came to campaign against him personally. Arnold's star power and unlimited access to Republican money would overwhelm any state legislator.

When Arnold wanted money from Indian casinos, he flooded the airways with commercials against the Indians. Arnold got his deal.

Anything Arnold wants, he just threatens to put it on the ballot as an initiative. Everyone knows that Arnold will win any initiative he wants because he can get free publicity and he can raise more money than the opposition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not LBN
Locking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC