Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld Opposes TRICARE Expansion Bill (Vets health care)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 04:22 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld Opposes TRICARE Expansion Bill (Vets health care)
Associated Press


Offering inactive National Guard members and reservists the same health care benefits as active-duty soldiers could force cuts in other areas of the military budget, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told lawmakers in a letter this week.

Rumsfeld said he would recommend that President Bush veto the defense authorization bill if it included a Senate plan to expand TRICARE, the military health program. He estimated the change could cost $5 billion per year, although Democrats disputed that figure. ---

"It's only a matter of fairness," Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said Thursday. "As we speak, members of the Guard and reserves are still on active duty. They're serving their country. And I believe that as they come home, having sacrificed so much, at least we ought to give them the opportunity to pay for their own health insurance under TRICARE."

Daschle said earlier estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office put the cost of the TRICARE extension at $300 million. The plan requires reservists who choose the coverage to pay a share of the costs.

"I can't imagine where (Rumsfeld) would have gotten the figure that this would cost billions of dollars," Daschle said.

A Pentagon spokesman declined to comment Thursday on the discrepancy. ---

Banish bush From Texas Too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Totally understandable.
The more money that goes to those guys that fight, the less that can go to bush's friends contracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. *clearing throat* and the military isnt a consistent dem constiuency why
We are the ones who started the GI Bill there would be no GI Bill today if the more fair republicans of yesteryear opposed it their far conservative comrades of today would oppose it too. This is an outrage they earned and deserved this fuck you Rummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Heh
Clinton signed the FY2000 Defense Authorization Act. This bill gave the military the choice of choosing between getting 50% of the average of the highest three years of service or keeping the old plan(40%)plus $30,000. This is an improvement over what Reagan did. Reagan enacted the Military Retirement Reform Act of 1986. This bill slashed the 20 year retirement from 50% to 40%.

Remember that the 105th Congress was under Clinton:
http://public.scott.af.mil/375aw/rao/Section2/SSec2.16.5.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I agree Fuck the Bastard
Edited on Fri Jul-11-03 07:17 PM by saigon68
He knows nothing about being an E-4, with a family living on food stamps. He's just SCUM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think that this is an intelligent move on Daschle's part
He's trying to solve a problem while at the same time wooing a part of the Republican base that is getting increasingly angry with this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Tie this to the story of the "Disabled Vet Tax"
that there was "bipartisan" support for, but after white house pressure to veto, many congressional repubs have backed off - leaving the dems to push for it.

Read about it earlier today. See this thread. All of these stories need to be put together and repeated frequently. Get the word out. This administration does not Support the Troops - especially those that get injured due to their service to this country.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=6198&mesg_id=6198&listing_type=search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Republicans DO support the Military
CONTRACTORS.
I mean, if they gave the troops better health care, then they might be only able to build 99 instead of 100 of those anti ballistic missiles that don't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. When I was married to ex navy man I liked tricare.
Gop likes the service in a very strang way. As a fighting unit for the corp yes and if they can build something for money they go for it but the men can go to hell as far as they think. That party has forgot people a long time ago. Profits are what counts with them.It is like we are not all living on the same earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LauraK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. To Bad the military is voting electronic in '04. Toooo Bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. OH GOP and Rummsfeld just show their cards! JERKS
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lkinsale Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, and Iraq is costing $4 billion a MONTH, Rummy
Aren't you the fiscal wizard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Fucking chickenhawks
If they want to fight and pay for their wars, they better start tossing us a bone every now and then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. I swear, are these people absolute morons, or just plain evil?
How do they think they can get away with this crap? Because they've pulled of The Man Behind The Curtain for the past two years, do they think NO ONE in America is going to notice or care about this sort of thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Just Plain Evil Morons.
These are the same folks who are raking in "bonuses" for kissing Bush's ass.

Support the Troops - Until they need anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC