Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whistleblower recounts dilemma in turning over Abu Ghraib photos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 12:23 PM
Original message
Whistleblower recounts dilemma in turning over Abu Ghraib photos
FORT BRAGG, North Carolina (CNN) -- The young military policeman who blew the whistle on Abu Ghraib testified Friday he waited a month to turn over incriminating photos to investigators because it was "a hard call" to send his own friends to prison.

Sgt. Joseph Darby said he finally acted because he was shocked by the photos and worried that the abuse was about to resume.

"It violated everything I personally believed in and everything I had been taught about war. It was more of a moral call than anything," Darby testified.
...
In Friday testimony, Darby said he got the photos on a computer disc from guard Charles Graner in early December last year. Darby finally turned them over to investigators at the prison in mid-January, just before Graner was due to return to duty in the high-security area where the abuses had taken place.

"I was concerned it was going to start again," Darby testified.
more....

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/08/06/lynndie.england.hearing/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtTheEndOfTheDay Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. This guy is gutsy.
I admire him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I read somewhere that there were threats
against him and his family after this happened. - more than against those who did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just goes to show how corrupt the Repugs are getting....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. This guy is fucked for life.
Any time he applies for a job, they can search and find this background. Corporations detest whistle-blowers - of any kind. While we laud him here on DU, we have nothing close to the kind of "whistle-blower protection" in this country to overcome the disaster these people face in their attempts to obtain employment. (Not everyone is able to go it alone - so-called entrepreneurs.)

Corporations avoid hiring: (1) the unemployed, (2) people whose credit ratings have been nailed by unemployment, (3) boat-rockers and whistle-blowers, and (4) anyone on record as suing a company.

With the Internet, background investigations (both formal and informal) are made one helluva lot easier for hiring managers and personnel departments. Newspapers on-line add to the easily-available record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. blacklisted...
...I know of someone who reported discrimination to the EEOC and they investigated the employer who was doing it. Though the employer was found guilty, that person has been blacklisted ever since.

Even outside background checks, employers, corporations, and personnel departments and the various bigwigs involved have codewords, and key words they use to refer to potential employees verbally or in writing that 'flag' them for not being hired. These words and phrases are simply known in the industry - they are NOT discussed or written anywhere or documented anywhere. They're simply understood as red flags to indicate 'nohire'...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Charles Graner is Lyndie England's fiance and father of her baby...
Edited on Fri Aug-06-04 02:23 PM by KansDem
In Friday testimony, Darby said he got the photos on a computer disc from guard Charles Graner in early December last year. Darby finally turned them over to investigators at the prison in mid-January, just before Graner was due to return to duty in the high-security area where the abuses had taken place.

"I was concerned it was going to start again," Darby testified.

Graner, a former prison guard in Pennsylvania with a history of domestic violence, has been identified as a ringleader of the physical abuse and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners kept at Abu Ghraib. He is awaiting court-martial in Baghdad.


and...

A Rabble not a Unit

Long ago, in a galaxy far away, when I was an active duty US Marine Corps officer, I had a few interactions with US Army reserve units. While there are doubtless exceptions, I generally found the officers of such units to be buffoons and the troops an undisciplined rabble. Consequently, I wasn't surprised to learn that Abu Ghraib prison, where the abuse of Iraqi prisoners occurred, was manned by US Army reservists.

Here's an example of the kind of soldier (and I use that term in the loosest possible manner) who comprised the 372nd MP Company at Ghaib:


Specialist Graner, who wears a Marine Corps eagle tattoo on his right arm, served in the corps from April 1988 until May 1996, when he left with the rank of corporal, according to military records. He went to work immediately at the State Correctional Institution Greene, in southwestern Pennsylvania, where he has held an entry-level corrections officer position ever since.

Eight years on active duty and he never rose beyond the rank of corporal. That is one seriously sorry-assed Marine.

Here's another:


Pfc. Lynndie R. England, who was married and divorced before she was 21, worked at a chicken-processing plant in West Virginia.

England, 21, was born in Kentucky and moved with her family to a spacious trailer in Fort Ashby, W.Va., after her father, a railroad utility worker, was transferred. Briefly married to longtime friend, she was divorced before she left for Iraq last year.

Private England, 21, may have frequently visited the prison because she was romantically involved with Specialist Graner. They say she is pregnant and has been sent to Fort Bragg, N.C., where she continues to be questioned by investigators. Her parents said she had not told them she was pregnant.


http://gweilodiaries.com/archives2/cat_iraq.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lottie244 Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Swiftboaters will be after him soon. They anyone telling the truth
about the ubliness of war and what some of our troops really do during wartime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. He phoned in his testimony like others but
they don't say where he is. For others who phoned in, at least their base of location was available in the articles. Maybe that's for his safety.

It made me wonder: Don't military courts afford the accused the right to face their accuser?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC