Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ashcroft Is Asked to Explain Department Role in Berger Case -NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:23 PM
Original message
Ashcroft Is Asked to Explain Department Role in Berger Case -NYT
WASHINGTON, Aug. 6 - A top House Democrat called on Attorney General John Ashcroft on Friday to explain why the Justice Department was letting federal officials cooperate in a Congressional inquiry into the case of Samuel R. Berger despite a current criminal investigation.

The representative, Henry A. Waxman of California, the senior Democrat on the Government Reform Committee, said the department position regarding Mr. Berger, a national security adviser to President Bill Clinton accused of mishandling classified documents, was at odds with how inquiries tied to the Bush administration had been handled.

"For example, in the investigation into the leak of the identity of covert C.I.A. agent Valerie Plame, officials have said repeatedly that they cannot comment because the matter is currently under investigation," Mr. Waxman wrote. He said the policy was "intended to maintain the integrity of the investigation and protect the individuals involved."

The panel chairman, Representative Tom Davis, Republican of Virginia, called on the National Archives and Records Administration this week to provide materials related to Mr. Berger, who has acknowledged improperly removing documents from the archives last year but has said it was inadvertent

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/07/politics/07berger.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Got to love Waxman
Wheeeeee !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. (sigh) and the media continues to get the facts wrong
"The panel chairman, Representative Tom Davis, Republican of Virginia, called on the National Archives and Records Administration this week to provide materials related to Mr. Berger, who has acknowledged improperly removing documents from the archives last year but has said it was inadvertent"

He didn't remove documents from the archives. He removed copies of documents. The documents themselves NEVER left the archives. Once a lie is told, it never dies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kick.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. You know, Waxman is onto something.
Those wacky Republicans keep abusing their positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Waxman Rides Again!
I love how he'll just call them on this shit. I hope other dems stand up with him and ask hard questions and demand answers.

The Plame outing was treason and should be investigated FIRST. Berger only took his own handwritten notes and returned them. He didn't risk anyone's life with his actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. ah the rotting smell of hypocrisy
Mr. Waxman said archives officials were scheduled to be questioned by House investigators on Wednesday and had been told they were "in no way constrained" from talking about the details with lawmakers or their aides. Mr. Waxman asked Mr. Ashcroft to explain why the prosecutors were overruled and whether he would "similarly 'clear' " officials to discuss other cases, like Ms. Plame's.

An honest answer to that question, would be:

"Why no, that wouldn't be politically expedient."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. My favorite superhero. Up in the air! It's a bird ! It's a plane !
Nope - it's WAXMAN - defender of democracy and greatest enemy of evildoer repuglicans!

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hope Waxman stays away from small aircraft....
We all know the repuke M.O., and everyone who disagrees with them is likely to die in a small plane crash.

O8)God protect Waxman!!! O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC