Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Backs Off Bush Sales Tax Quip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:05 PM
Original message
White House Backs Off Bush Sales Tax Quip
WASHINGTON - Administration officials on Wednesday denied that President Bush is considering a national sales tax, a day after the Republican incumbent created a stir by calling such a tax "an interesting idea that we ought to explore seriously."

Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry seized on Bush's comments — made while the president was campaigning in Florida Tuesday — and suggested such a plan would create a new tax on working families.

"Families already squeezed by rising health care costs, gas costs and college costs would have to carry a whole new tax burden," Kerry said in a statement.

The flap was prompted by an exchange between Bush and a supporter who asked during a town-hall meeting in Niceville, Fla., about Bush's position on legislation for a national sales tax.
...
Later, two administration officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Bush was not considering a national sales tax.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20040811/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_sales_tax

flippity, floppity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. UH OH...Flip flop????? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Flippy the Flip-Flopper strikes again!!
Ya know, I just knew that national sales tax thing was gonna bite him in the ass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Not a flip-flop...
To Bush, "an interesting idea that we ought to explore seriously" is not a "consideration," or something like that. :crazy:

(/sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. quote from Grover Norquist:
"SHHHHHHHH! Not yet, dumbass! We don't spring that one on 'em till you're in the second term!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. POP - there goes another trial balloon
nfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. next up -- return to the gold standard
And then they can trot out abolishing public education...

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Papa Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought Bush says what he means, and means what he says
Wasn't he the plain spoken President? Sounds like flip flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCentepedeShoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Cmdr Bunnypants
has no brain to engage before he opens his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. two administration officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity
the mysterious shadow speaks again....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Flip-Flop Flap.
What a group of morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Our glorious leader does not flip flop!
He kinda wobbles as he spins around in the wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. He flopped before he flipped ??
That was quick ! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bush demands immediate research into medicinal properties of leeches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. flip-flop and
proof that *Co will say absolutely anything to get votes.

What a box of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. A "quip," they say
But if Kerry had said the exact same thing, it would have been a "proposal."

Another moment when I'm ashamed to be a journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The GOP only makes "quips and jokes"
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 07:24 PM by plastic_turkeys
"Hey, I was only kidding!" No responsiblity for their words or deeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bringbackfdr Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Hopefully, it will get some air time
Kerry's lapse into Senate-speak - I voted for it before I voted against it - still lives. If there is any fairness Bush's sales tax gaffe will live just as long.
Not that I'm betting on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. If we got rid of personal and corporate income tax ...
Edited on Wed Aug-11-04 09:37 PM by struggle4progress
but eliminated no other sources of revenue, and continued Reagan's trick, using SS surpluses to cover part of our current expenses, and also decided not to allow further deficit spending.

All this is to be covered by a tax on retail sales and food.

What's the tax rate? 34.6% The first 18.5% of this covers the annual deficit and existing debt service.

And using sales tax to cover all federal outlays would require something like a 57% federal sales tax.

Yet another Republican tax-policy "success" ...


Data etc:

2003 service on national debt: 318.1 billions
http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdint.htm

2003 federal deficit (after using 2003 SS surplus as offset): $ 375.3 billions
http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1821&sequence=0#table1

2003 federal outlays: $2,157.6 billions
http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1821&sequence=0#table1

2003 federal revenue from personal income tax: 793.7 billions
http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1821&sequence=0#table1

2003 federal revenue from corporate income tax: 131.8 billions
http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1821&sequence=0#table1

2003 retail and food sales: $3,756.7 billions
http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/data/html/nsal03.html

Federal sales tax rate needed to cover 2003 service on national debt:
318.1/3,756.7 = 8.5%

Federal sales tax rate needed to cover 2003 federal deficit:
375.3 /3,756.7 = 10.0%

Federal sales tax rate needed to cover 2003 federal deficit and service on national debt:
(318.1 + 375.3)/3,756.7 = 18.5%

Federal sales tax rate needed to eliminate 2003 personal income tax:
793.7/3,756.7 = 21.1%

Federal sales tax rate needed to eliminate 2003 corporate income tax:
131.8/3,756.7 = 3.5%

Federal sales tax rate that would have been needed to eliminate the 2003 federal budget deficit, if no existing sources of revenue were abolished: 536,100/3,756,688 = 14%

Federal sales tax rate that would have been needed to cover all 2003 federal budget outlays, assuming no other sources of revenue: 2,157,600/3,756,688 = 57%

<edit:grammar>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC