Saturday, August 14, 2004; Page A01
Over the past week, President Bush and Vice President Cheney have thrown Sen. John F. Kerry on the defensive with a daily assault designed to tarnish his credentials as a possible commander in chief. But the orchestrated attacks also revealed the president's vulnerabilities on the issue that continues to shape the presidential campaign as much as any other.
The volleys over terrorism came after Kerry and his advisers believed they had put behind them most questions about his capacity to lead the country in a war on terrorism. Instead, Kerry and his advisers allowed themselves to be drawn into a new debate about Iraq and terrorism and were forced to rebut daily charges that Kerry has equivocated and sent conflicting signals on national security.
Kerry advisers see the criticisms as both wrong and distorted. But the exchanges were a reminder of how the issue of Iraq has bedeviled Kerry's candidacy first in the Democratic primaries and now the general election as he has navigated between the demands of the antiwar faction in his own party and a desire to project strong leadership to a general-election audience.
The attacks also underscored the urgency within Bush's campaign to deny Kerry a sustained post-convention bounce. With some polls showing Kerry made clear gains against Bush on terrorism and national security, the president's weakness on the issues that once were his great strengths was on clear display.
more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63875-2004Aug13.html