Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Kerry on Defensive About Iraq (Attacks Reflect Bush's Problems )

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 10:25 PM
Original message
WP: Kerry on Defensive About Iraq (Attacks Reflect Bush's Problems )
Saturday, August 14, 2004; Page A01

Over the past week, President Bush and Vice President Cheney have thrown Sen. John F. Kerry on the defensive with a daily assault designed to tarnish his credentials as a possible commander in chief. But the orchestrated attacks also revealed the president's vulnerabilities on the issue that continues to shape the presidential campaign as much as any other.

The volleys over terrorism came after Kerry and his advisers believed they had put behind them most questions about his capacity to lead the country in a war on terrorism. Instead, Kerry and his advisers allowed themselves to be drawn into a new debate about Iraq and terrorism and were forced to rebut daily charges that Kerry has equivocated and sent conflicting signals on national security.

Kerry advisers see the criticisms as both wrong and distorted. But the exchanges were a reminder of how the issue of Iraq has bedeviled Kerry's candidacy first in the Democratic primaries and now the general election as he has navigated between the demands of the antiwar faction in his own party and a desire to project strong leadership to a general-election audience.

The attacks also underscored the urgency within Bush's campaign to deny Kerry a sustained post-convention bounce. With some polls showing Kerry made clear gains against Bush on terrorism and national security, the president's weakness on the issues that once were his great strengths was on clear display.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63875-2004Aug13.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Geez, who woke up Dan Balz
and pulled his nose out of Rove's er pocket...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-04 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Are you sure that was his pocket that his nose was in?
ny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry's campaign's recent remarks on Iraq...
...discounting the importance of WMDs are just further signs of the narrowing between his position and Bush's on Iraq.

We don't want a fucking technocrat who will fight the war better.

We want an end to this accursed war, John Kerry. Wake up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kerry needs to jump out of the "MR Nice GUY boat"
Kerry needs to get tough! Kerry needs to show Americans he is willing to stand up for America again, much like he did in Vietnam - Kerry jumped out of the boat and chased the enemy down - he did not turn the other cheek and hope the enemy would not harm him or other Americans. Kerry needs to show he still has that willingness to fight for America. Kerry needs to jump out of the "Mr Nice Guy boat" and chase down these liars and show them what being tough is. Kerry needs to show Americans he is fighting the good fight.

Like it or not, most Americans are looking for a strong leader. The more Kerry allows these attacks go on without fighting back the weaker he looks. If he is going to be like other democrats that refuse to fight back + if he is going to be too afraid of being called names to stand up for what he believes and insist the media get it straight the less chances of him winning. Al Gore tried the high road, refusing to engage in counter attacks, we saw what happened. On the other hand Clinton took every attack as an open door to attack back, and that is what he did, it was not called an "attack" because he was only responding to their attacks. Clinton wanted the attacks, that way he could get tough without looking like the individual that gets negative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC