Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. aircraft pound Shi'ite rebels in Najaf

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:45 PM
Original message
U.S. aircraft pound Shi'ite rebels in Najaf
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LAD968693.htm

NAJAF, Iraq, Aug 19 (Reuters) - Suspected U.S. AC-130 gunships pounded positions held by Sh'ite militiamen in the Iraqi holy city of Najaf on Thursday and large orange multiple flashes lit the night sky.

A large cloud of smoke was rising from an ancient cemetery where rebels loyal to radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr have fought U.S. troops for two weeks.

The explosions from the bombing, that went on for more than 30 minutes, were loudly heard several km (miles) away.

more...I thought the Iraqi army was handling this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Iraqi army=South Vietnamese army
same war- just changed the name and location
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. There are some problems with that
Edited on Thu Aug-19-04 03:05 PM by Aidoneus
there have been legal edicts from respected scholars, forbidding Iraqi Muslims from following orders of the puppet regime to harm other Muslims. Sometimes hundreds at a time, others individually or small groups, the "Iraqi" police and army have either refused their posts or, as in al-`Amarah most notably and on other occasions in the other central/southern cities, gone over to Sadr(HA)'s Jaysh al-Mahdi. Therefore, the Marines and other foreign mercenaries have to do the dirty work; they are assisted zealously by the Baathists placed in high-level positions in the puppet "Iraqi government".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. "U.S. aircraft further pulverize cemetary rubble in Najaf"
Or should the be "rubbles", as in "Shiite Rubbles" or
"radical, firebrand, militant, anti-iraqi shiite rubbles".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I read everything around the mosque has been bombed to rubble...
...but I have seen no pix to prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Given that they kicked all the journalists out of Najaf...
..under penalty of death (threatened to shoot them), I'm not surprised you haven't seen any pictures yet.

Keep an eye on the overseas media. Something will show up soon, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REVOLT823 Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. What are
"Suspected U.S. AC130 Gunships"? Are we now pontificating that the Iraqis have an Air Force again? Don't editors bother to read these things before they go out on the wire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Language bends to the Party Line
The official party line is that the 'Iraqis' are doing the fighting in Najaf. The sighting of a C-130 is an uncomfortable fact that seems to contradict this story.

So they say 'suspected C-130', because the Party Faithful don't even trust their own eyes if they contradict the official party line.

And no, it doesn't make sense to non-Party members. I'm not sure it's even supposed to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. al-Sadr backing down again???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, that was from a short while earlier (in terms of order of events)
Sayyid Muqtada as-Sadr(HA) had tenatively agreed to some sort of truce arrangement as proposed by a "peace delegation" and with their own requirements added. It was predicated on there being an actual cessation of hostilities on the part of the aggressors, but it was progress none the less. The occupyers responded by bombing the fuck out of everything. Sadr(HA) should talk to a native of this continent (if he can find one, that is) before agreeing to any deals with the American occupyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC