Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anarchists Emerge as the Convention's WIld Card (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
oldhat Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:40 PM
Original message
Anarchists Emerge as the Convention's WIld Card (NYT)
http://nytimes.com/2004/08/20/nyregion/20protests.html?position=&hp=&pagewanted=print&position=

Anarchists Emerge as the Convention's Wild Card
By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

Their reputation precedes them.

Self-described anarchists were blamed for inciting the violence in Seattle at a 1999 meeting of the World Trade Organization in which 500 people were arrested and several businesses damaged. They have been accused by the police of throwing rocks or threatening officers with liquid substances at demonstrations against the Republican convention in Philadelphia in 2000 and at an economic summit meeting in Miami last year.

Now, as the Republican National Convention is about to begin in New York City, the police are bracing for the actions of this loosely aligned and often shadowy group of protesters, and consider them the great unknown factor in whether the demonstrations remain under control or veer toward violence and disorder.

The city is trying everything from giving protesters discount coupons to using an army of police officers to deter violent protests, and police officials said yesterday that they have identified about 60 people as militants, some of whom were arrested for violent acts in past protests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not really sure these people are our allies
Will these people show up to the polls to evict Bush from the White House by doing the only thing that will accomplish that end--voting for Kerry?

These people are so busy plotting disorder and mayham that I wonder if they will actually remember that they have a real chance to remove Bush as president on November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldhat Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They're not
They're bored rich white kids with trust funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Ah, yes -- the Trustafarians
A small but loud pig-headed tribe, mon.

Jah bring peace, but AnarKids bring down da cold wind.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crachet2004 Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. The Anarchist is a friend of no organized Party...
But they seem to have a strong presence in the Northeast, and were conspicuous by their absence in Boston...probably saving their strength for an enemy they hate worse than us-the GOP.

I hope nothing untoward occurs in New York, as I believe we can win straight up, this go round...like last time, I guess, come to think of it.

But if Bush steals another election, or pulls shenanigans to suppress the vote in parts of the country and wins that way...how many of us will be quietly rooting for those kids in Black, sacrificing their bodies against the police lines of our new terror state?

I cannot agree with Anarchist philosophy, but I do give them the courage of their convictions...something I think I cannot say is always true of our own Party. The scene in F911, "the Senator is missing...", comes to mind.

But perhaps their nonappearance at Boston bodes well for New York...they are young (for the most part, I think), and hot-blooded-they will be there...but knowing Kerry has admitted some of their concerns-like the trade treaties-must be addressed, perhaps they will give peace one last chance.

At any rate, I hope that anyone from DU planning on attending, takes cameras-preferably video-to document the actions of both the police and provacateurs of ANY kind. Hopefully, we will not be blamed as a Party for the actions of the relative few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghetto_Boy Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
35. They will play into the "WILD EYED DEMOCRAT" propaganda
They are not our friends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
41. Guys, remember this is propaganda, won't you?
These articles about anarchists have been popping up all over for the last 2 weeks.
1. The anarchists have a point..many points..about global capitalism and about the inherent evils of government. All governments get corrupted. It's healthy for people to learn to be wary of government because it is mostly a tool for plutocrats to control the masses.
2. Just because 1 anarchist out of 100 is off balance or extreme doesn't mean the other 99 are. I know a few people who call themselves 'anarchists' who are wonderful, creative, and productive people. They participated in Seattle but they are also producing excellent quality media works which all of us rely on for news.
3. Their message is hated by the plutocrats and the best way to make sure it isn't heard by the public is to vilify them through articles like this. We do not need to adopt their perspective, but a small dose of it might be 'good for what ails us' as a society.
4. Many anarchists are deviating from their typical point of view, and ARE going to go vote, for Kerry, this year because Bush is so insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. Thank you!
I still find it surprising that people around here, usually so good at detecting bullshit, still bite on some things like this, and accept the Powers That Be party line. Folks, given a little information, you would know that being an anarchist is about freedom, equality, and anti-authoritarianism. This article, and those like it, are bullshit, as is the attitude of many of the people here. You're accepting a blatantly biased spin with the agenda of painting an entire group of people. It is tantamount to saying that because some black men have killed white women, ALL black men kill white women. Yes, there are lunatics and pretenders, but they do not represent the principles of the group.

I'd bet, for instance, that most people here don't realize that anarchists are traditionally on the left wing. Or that anarchism has strong ties to the anti-war and civil rights movements. Or, for that matter, that for most, anarchism is a philosopical exercise rather than a cause to be acted upon.

And for the record--I have been an anarchist for 8 years. I do not have a trust fund, nor a black ski mask. I have never rioted, never built bombs, and always loyally vote Democratic every chance I get. Nor do I have much time for people who can't say these things. If you're going to place blame, please place it where it belongs, not on the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaos Donating Member (870 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Self-described anarchists
They read like kids to me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yep. Kids wearing black ski masks--some of them.
Edited on Thu Aug-19-04 11:28 PM by janx
They love confrontation and serve as pepper spray magnets at any given protest or rally.

But it's a free world, and they're free to express themselves. I only hope they don't relish confrontation so much that the protest is rendered ineffective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaos Donating Member (870 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Free world.
I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
44. Children have often been
at the very forefront of the struggle for change. (I am making no comment on the anarchists here but merely defending the young and their contributions to social and political change.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anarchists don't vote. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaos Donating Member (870 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They are to busy being angry?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
49. Yes we do. NT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's not fair to blame 20 people who broke windows in
Seattle, who weren't arrested, for the thousands of innocent people the police attacked with tear gas and clubs the next day.

The window-breakers were wrong, but so were the Seattle Mayor and police who proceeded to attack innocent people.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Agents provacateurs.
Hey, Agent Mike--got any friends in ski masks you'd like us to say "Hi" to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Norman Mailer: The protests could cost Kerry the election...
This is a deeply insightful interview from the old leftwing rabble-rouser, recalling (among other things) the impact of the 1968 Chicago protests upon Humphrey's hopes:

http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/rnc/9574/

Mailer recently repeated this warning in a chat with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notbush Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Great read!!!!
I've had my own concerns about this recently...Who knows NOW what will happen, and how the public will react.
If it's Seattle times 10.....It's gonna hurt our guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
42. It was a great interview, and disturbing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
46. Remember, the 1968 protests were against Humphrey, not Nixon. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. gotta love our anarchists...
...for they are the avant guerre of change. So what if they're rich white kids- the most honorable job, nay, the only job with honor a rich kid could have is anarchist, since the alternative is more rich white kids hoarding their wealth while acting to keep the downtrodden down. I salute the anarchists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drhilarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. or...
they could use that money and the time it affords them to make positive, constructive political change. Let's face it, these anarchists, if they start throwing shit through windows and setting fires, will only reify in people's minds the image of the left that the right wants them to have. It could very well cost Kerry a few million votes, perhaps even the election (I imagine swing states like MO and OH aren't known for their love of violent social radicals). Sure, for some it is a way to strike out against the system. For others it's a way to derive some kicks. At any rate, they will have their money, and when they get bored their daddies can get them into Harvard law, and meanwhile people will suffer the real world consequences of their action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
31. It's just a phase they're going through.
Like the SDS members I knew back in the 60's.

The wealth will continue to be hoarded. That's what trust funds do; they supply the children of wealth with generous allowances while preserving the family fortunes. Some of those children do go on to live useful lives; others play at radicalism before taking up their intended places in society.

There have been honorable Anarchist movements. But they were led by real workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. I think people are missing something
the "anarchists" are the excuse for trampling on the rights of everyone.
I will bet you anything the supposed "anarchist" website where the feds claim people are urged to bring slingshots, Molotov cocktails etc. to NYC is a fake set up by the 'feds'. It's so fucking obvious. Don't you get it?
I am so discouraged that so few people see through this.
How about documented evidence were these young folks who think of themselves as 'anarchists have advocated or carried out serious violence.
IMO, jumping on this bandwagon is taking the bait hook line and sinker. Come on folks these kids are not angels but they are also not what they are being cast as. This whole 'scare' is being manufactured and people are buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. are you saying there are no bonafide anarchists? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. did I say that?
Edited on Fri Aug-20-04 02:04 AM by G_j
no, I'm saying the "violent anarchist" meme is being used as another scare tactic, it is way overblown and in most cases fabricated.
There are plenty of people who call themselves "Anarchists", Are they a serious threat to anyone? I really don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. thanks for the re-iteration, but...
...I think there's more to self-described anarchists than the self-description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. maybe I'm not being clear
Edited on Fri Aug-20-04 02:24 AM by G_j
I think 'they' are for the most part far more constructive and creative than they are generally given credit for, more so than the general population. I've known and worked with lots of people who consider themselves anarchists. These folks are into stuff like 'guerrilla gardening' and renovating and maybe squatting in abandoned houses, "Food not Bombs" etc.
The main point of my original post was that I strongly suspect the supposed website and plans for terrible "violence" mentioned are bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. i most certainly agree with this post...
...and I wasn't trying to be obtuse, earlier. Yeah, I think we've come to expect these types of disinfo front groups from the right to continue to emerge, along with the intensity and blatant lying to increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Oh, there are definitely anarchists....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
43. Ya' think?
Hook, line, and sucker, I say.

And hard to believe the Corporate Media would truck out this tired 80+ year old meme! What poverty of thought!

Next thing Emma Goldman is going to roll under a dairy wagon, scaring the bejeesus out of the horse as the bomb goes off! Shudders!!! Pass Patriot Act II! Cancel the elections!!! It's the ANARCHISTS wot dun it!!!

...however, be very very wary of agent provocateur, as they will be on the RNC like flies on, um, a dead worn out horse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. Anarchists or criminals?
there is a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I love that headline
anarchists are just SOOOOOOO disorganized. lol


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodehopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
22. I am so sick of the corporate media demonization of "crazy anarchists"
The "acid" plot mentioned in the article is an urban legend passed from police department to police department, one city to the next. Same goes for giant puppets as being used to hide explosives, balloons filled with urine or bleach, etc.

This is not Seattle 1999, and there is a clear sense of that in the air among people organizing this time around. The creative, performative actions of civil disobedience that are planned have nothing to do with the kind of "anarchist bogeyman" the media loves to portray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. thank you n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Invalence1 Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. acronyms
Would someone please be kind enough to enlighten me? What do "eom", "tyy", and "n/t" mean? Please forgive my ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. End of Message, ???, No/Text
I have no clue what tyy means :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Invalence1 Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Acronyms
Thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. eom - end of message
tyy - I don't know this one either.
n/t - no text.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodehopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #24
47. :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
27. NYT Whores Again. Flat Out Lies. Seattle Police Riot, RNC 2000 too
Miami FTAA was Pre-emptive Martial Law and Police Riot

Portland Police Riot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. It's a fair and balanced report DU "reader"
Edited on Fri Aug-20-04 06:46 AM by NewYorkerfromMass
Did you read this?

"With an obscenity, he dismissed allegations that his officers needlessly roughed up demonstrators in Miami, saying anarchists and other anti-authoritarians had repeatedly provoked the police."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. I couldn't read that part as it was obscured by the vomit on my screen
fair and balanced, lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. I'm always willing to help see thru the vomit
and help unbelievers see the Times for what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. "anarchists and other anti-authoritarians"?
"anarchists and other anti-authoritarians"? Does this include Libertarians?

"Anarchists"? "Outside agitators"? "Lunatic fringe"? Where have I heard all this before? There has been a growing tendency since 9/11 to lump all protesters together as "terrorists". "Anarchist" has always been a especially loaded term to justify all manner of police repression. It's often a self-justifying proposition: tense, confronted with a crowd of demonstrators, whom they are warned are a "bunch of anarchists", police start to use physical force, provoking an otherwise peaceful protest to take just the violent turn which they were told to fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
29. ok, so why are anarchists more angry with the GOP when they don't vote?
they didn't seem to do much damage at the Democratic Convention... what exactly is it about bushco that causes so much mayhem? it must be part of the plan... there's mayhem everywhere bush goes. some kind of rovian tactic... perhaps to get back at his wife for leaving him or saying she never loved him, or to get back at his dad for not being his real dad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
50. Who said we don't vote? NT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
36. In the 60's it was the communist sympathizers
The FBI had a big investigation in Tampa in the late 60's trying to root out those horrible commies. At the end of the day, it turned out that they were all spying on each other and there were no real commies.

Now the new meme is those horrible anarchists. I bet half of these so called 'anarchists' turn out to be repug operatives stirring up trouble. Some things never change.

Note: Despite my avatar, I am not an anarchist. It also happens to be my initials, "AO" and I've signed my initials like that for years, before I knew that it was also the symbol for anarchy. LOL. Ironically, my great-grandfather was an anarchist, so maybe it runs in the family?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
38. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v3.0
==================



This week is our third quarter 2004 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend almost entirely
on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for
your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Right Makes Might Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
45. I think this article is BS
Edited on Fri Aug-20-04 10:40 AM by Right Makes Might
From what I remember, it was the police who started the violence. I vaguely recall reading something from the non-violent Goddess worshipping Starhawk - who is definitely not an anarchist - saying that.

Hold on, I'm off to do some research.



Edit: I'm back, and here's what I dug up...

The media is working hard to portray the protests as a violent riot. Do not believe them. In reality, there were thousands and thousands of peaceful protestors in Seattle and a tiny handful of people who broke windows. The police did not pursue the windowbreakers-- in fact, when one of them was surrounded and subdued by a group of nonviolent protestors the police refused to arrest him. While the police complain that they "were not prepared for the violence", in reality they condoned and possibly instigated the vandalism that did occur, and that is dwarfed by the immense violence of the police, who used tear gas on peaceful protestors, pepper sprayed handcuffed women in their cells, shot nuns with rubber bullets, beat seated blockaders with billy clubs, ran amuck and terrorized whole neighborhoods.

Link: http://www.starhawk.org/activism/activism-writings/openletter.html



POLICE VIOLENCE AT WTO PROTESTS COST SEATTLE TAXPAYERS $250,000
By Kirsten Anderberg

Now, this WTO settlement is some great precedence since the Seattle Police rioted upon peaceful anti-war protesters in Seattle on March 22, 2003, on First Avenue, between Spring and Marion streets, and again on 5th Avenue and Union on June 2, 2003, at the LEIU protests. I witnessed both events firsthand. Many of the issues in these WTO trials will affect the outcomes of these antiwar and LEIU police riot situations from 2003. In weeks after the violence by Seattle police at the anti-war protests in March 2003, the Seattle City Council was flooded with complaints from citizens about the violence on that day, and the ACLU and local organizations reprimanded the Mayor and City government, publicly, for the police brutality we all witnessed. Many of us, myself included, have put in claims against the city for the police and mayoral behaviors at the 2003 protests in Seattle. My contention is that if Seattle police had no right to arrest those protesters at the 1999 WTO protests, for simply protesting, they also had no right to beat, assault, and falsely imprison, from what I saw, (and arrest in some cases), any of the approximately 500 people on March 22, 2003 that police abused in Seattle. The Seattle Police also had no right to riot, from what I saw with my own eyes, using unnecessary force without discretion, as they did at the LEIU protests in Seattle. Attorneys for the WTO protesters argued it was unconstitutional to herd bystanders together and arrest them, without giving them a chance to disperse. Yet that is EXACTLY what Seattle police did on March 22 and June 2, 2003.

Link: http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2004/01/102642.shtml




We've got to stop letting ourselves be lead around by the nose by the media, who are themselves whores to people like Bush and his backers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Starhawk is correct & here is the NLG report
and here is the definitive in depth report from the National Lawyer's Guild. This is a must read for anyone attempting to understand what happened in Seattle.

http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/nlg070700.html

Seattle National Lawyers Guild
Releases Draft Report on WTO Ministerial





PRESS RELEASE
National Lawyers Guild
CONTACT: Paul Richmond, wtolegal@yahoo.com

The Seattle Chapter of the National Lawyers Guild has just released its report on the World Trade Organization Ministerial. The report examines what took place in Seattle as an example of larger trends brought about by destructive economic policies. The report pays particular attention to the thinning lines between law enforcement and the military and the adverse effects this loss of delineation is having on civil liberties. The report begins with an overview of the WTO. It provides the historical framework of the WTO as an institution born of the think tanks which were themselves created by the illicit fortunes of the robber barons. It provides concrete examples of the way the WTO has subverted democratic institutions, and had detrimental effects on human rights, the environment, safety and labor laws.

Following this, the report traces the way the WTO was brought to Seattle. It examines the lack of process that took place - most members of the Seattle City Council seem not to have been consulted until after the event was a done deal. Moreover, Seattle and King County are areas with a history of resistance to WTO and GATT. King County was declared an MAI free zone months before the WTO's arrival had been announced. Seattle was declared an MAI free zone weeks after the WTO's selection of Seattle as it's Ministerial site was announced.

Next comes a report of what took place on the streets of Seattle in the weeks leading up to the Ministerial and during the Ministerial itself. The report utilizes information from its 200 legal observers, and hundreds of witness declarations. It also utilizes information gained from public disclosure and from email chatlines utilized by participating members of law enforcement, including commanders and line members of the Seattle Police Department. A picture is painted of confused, inexperienced law enforcement officers armed with frighteningly powerful, potentially lethal weaponry and little idea of what to do with it. Random forays seem to be launched against random groups of demonstrators. Thousands of people, including bystanders, are exposed to potentially lethal chemical agents hours before the first window is broken. Masked unmarked police invade the most densely populated area on the West Coast North of San Francisco, attacking residents and shoppers. Those arrested are often subjected to conditions resembling torture. Weapons are repeatedly deployed in ways that may be potentially lethal. Police themselves, are often injured by their own weapons.

The official reports that have been released by law enforcement consultants all paint pictures of a police force that should have used more force and should have utilized it earlier. The NLG draft report looks at the economic and political reasons these law enforcement administrators have adopted this perspective. It notes that the U.S. economy, is a wartime economy. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, much of those resources that were devoted to the military have been devoted to law enforcement, with major military contractors building prisons and designing "less lethal weapon systems." It looks at the moves to classify political dissent as a type of warfare, and to utilize recent demonstrations such as the WTO Ministerial as examples of why more force should be used. It notes the way the factors that have created a shrinking middle class, have further divided the "haves" and the "have-nots." The picture is one of a global village where the majority of the world's population lives in slums and prisons and a wealthy few ride around in armored limousines from fortified enclave to fortified enclave. This dynamic has created an enlarged and militarized law enforcement system.

The report then examines the thinning lines between the military, who are trained to kill, and law enforcement who are trained to preserve lives. It examines the way military tactics, training and weaponry have come to dominate law enforcement. Citing testimony of law enforcement professionals, the report then traces the disastrous effect this blending of the two has had on the fabric of democracy and members of law enforcement themselves. It examines the disastrous way this dynamic has played out in the past and the disastrous way this dynamic played out during the WTO Ministerial. Citing past work in the field, the report shows how such trends can endanger both the fabric of democratic society and the law enforcement officers themselves.

Particular attention is paid to the use of "less lethal" weaponry. The origins of rubber bullets, flying truncheons, CS and CN are examined. All began as weapons designed to put down rebellions and fight wars. All were gradually exported into the areas of law enforcement. Looking at the training materials provided by the manufacturers themselves, the lethality of these substances is examined in detail. If the projectiles strike from too close a distance or strike something other than the buttocks or thighs, it's usually a potentially trauma inducing or lethal use of force. If CS, or CN is used there are to be adequate ways for those present to escape, or it's potentially lethal especially, for the young, the elderly and those with diseases like AIDs. Anytime these substances are used, reports are to be administered on each person on whom the weapon was used, making it far less efficient to use these weapons than to simply arrest offenders.

Yet, repeatedly, all of these weapons were used in ways that could have easily been lethal. Part of the reason for this is that given the specific parameters of these weapons use, it is impossible to use them in situations where there a dozen people moving around, let alone hundreds or thousands.

The report concludes by looking at the melt down that occurred inside the ministerial itself. There are quotes by NGO's and delegates who found the process undemocratic, and heavilly slanted in favor of a few multinational corporations.

The report then looks at the aftermath that is taking place now in Seattle and issues recommendations. Among these recommendations are: Limiting the use of "less lethal" weapons to only those situations where lethal force is being threatened. In line with this, we recommend following the example of the European parliament and declaring all such weapons inappropriate for dealing with political protest. Examining the long terms effects of all those exposed to chemical agents, including members of law enforcement.

Examining the effect that the militarization, including SWAT training, waves of inexperienced new hires, and more lethal weaponry is having on the function of the police.

Investigating the role of all federal agencies, especially military, in the decision making processes.

Full text of the report:
http://www.nlg.org/programs/mass_defense/wto_report.htm
http://seattle.indymedia.org/local/images/NLG-REPORT.pdf
http://www.nlg.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC