Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Contempt Order Lifted in CIA Leak Case -(Cooper re: Plame case)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:06 AM
Original message
Contempt Order Lifted in CIA Leak Case -(Cooper re: Plame case)
Edited on Tue Aug-24-04 11:08 AM by party_line
WASHINGTON - Contempt of court orders against Time magazine and one of its reporters were dismissed after the journalist agreed to give a statement to prosecutors probing the Bush administration leak of a covert CIA (news - web sites) officer's identity.



In a statement Tuesday, Time said reporter Matthew Cooper agreed to give a deposition after Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, personally released Cooper from a promise of confidentiality about a conversation the two had last year.


Time and Cooper had been held in contempt earlier this month by U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan for refusing to testify in the leak probe. Hogan rejected their claims, as well as those of "Meet The Press" host Tim Russert, that the First Amendment protected them from having to testify.


Cooper had faced up to 18 months in jail and the magazine could have been forced to pay $1,000 a day under the contempt order, which has now been vacated. Russert avoided the contempt citation by agreeing to an interview with prosecutors earlier this month, again after Libby released him from a confidentiality promise.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20040824/ap_on_go_ot/cia_leak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can FEEL Russert's head about to come apart
what to do what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. It looks like Scooter Libby is going down Traitor is Ugly charge
This will ruin him politically

So many butt boys go down while the Heads are let go

Its so ugly for Bush's menials they all get so tainted Scalia Rumsfeld Powell Rice

and Rove and Cheney and Bush just smile

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good news!
This might be the beginning of the end for Bushco!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Scooter Libby -- no surprise -- Remember to vote on this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Kos' post, "Plame Rumors" last night nailed this one-
Plame rumors
by kos
Mon Aug 23rd, 2004 at 20:50:02 GMT

I've received some unsubstantiated rumors that Fitzgerald's office is nearing the end of its investigation, and that it will issue three indictments including Scooter Libby. According to these rumors, John Hannah, a Libby deputy, has been "turned" by the investigators and is singing like a canary. Hannah has already been linked to the case. If indeed he has turned state's witness, it would present a major breakthrough in the case.
As for timing, while the investigators hoped to wrap up the investigation within the next four to six weeks, that timeline is now in doubt and may, in fact, be put off until after the election.

Those are the rumors. Take them with a grain of salt.
more......

http://www.dailykos.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. This part makes me think nothing will happen.
"In a statement Tuesday, Time said reporter Matthew Cooper agreed to give a deposition after Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, personally released Cooper from a promise of confidentiality about a conversation the two had last year. "

Why would Libby let him out of the agreement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Possibly because . .
Edited on Tue Aug-24-04 12:42 PM by msmcghee
. . he saw he was going down and decided (probably his attorney advised him) it would look all the worse for him if he took down Russert and Cooper with him . . for no good reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. He'll probably just skip along...
...from "contempt" to perjury. Lying, it's all the rage these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Libby probably filled out
his pardon that will be issued and has more that he won't tell if that pardon goes through very quickly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rated "5"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. And as for Robert Novak, let's not forget that he NAMED A SOURCE in 1997
Edited on Tue Aug-24-04 11:14 AM by bobthedrummer
the FBI mole, Robert Hanssen.

Hanssen was a spy and a TRAITOR, of course and Robert Novak cited reasons of "national security" as outweighing the ethics of journalism- so that asshole Novak is no virgin to revealing sources either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. We need a way to put pressure on Bush to order everyone
in his administration to release all journalists from any promise of confidentiality concerning this matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. promises, scouts honor, secret oath and etc are now more important........
than if one breaks the law. The US justice system is in shambles

The problem isn't the crooks having more advantages than common folk, the problem is, mostly crooks are running things :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. What did * know about this and when did he know it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. They'll all be pardoned. But it's another brick in the wall.
IF it is done before November.

I'd love to see them all in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. There's the answer.
They know their asses are cooked, so they want to get this done and over with in time for a pardon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's exactly what's going on here. Bush is going to pardon the
whole lot of them. This whole exercise in justice was for naught.

Phucking assholes.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. I'm not sure this Bush would do any pardoning -- he's not H.W. --
and the perps aren't blue-blood Bushes. What do he and Rove care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. The promise of a pardon will be made by Bush
only in exchange for agreeing not to implicate anyone higher up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. remember Casper Weinberger's pardon
the one that closed down Iran-Contra?

That one was issued prior to his indictment and effectively ended all of the investigation. Merry Christmas Scooter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why oh why oh why
Would Libby release them if he knew they weren't gonna lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. My guess is that: There was more than one phone call
and more than one phone caller. One call mentions Plame but not her secret status. Other call mentions everything else, leaving out her name. It would have been obvious that both calls were about the same person, but nobody technically divulged her secret identity.

Can they get away with it? I don't know, although my gut says no. But ultimately, we have ask if this will, or could, affect the election. Most of us probably assume that likely Bush, and certainly Cheney, had a hand in this. The 'Pubs will be frantic to keep this mess off of those two. I imagine they will say or do pretty much anything to try to distract us from that possible connection. So they must work hard to prevent a "Reverse October Surprise"!!!

Keep the pressure on! Do not let this die! In a way, it doesn't matter how it turns out.

Internet Forum Members for Truth!!! (IFMFT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annxburns Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Is it possible that they didn't flip Libby's deputy ...
... but flipped Libby himself? Would that mean the scandal would go higher - to Cheney? It also may mean the investigation is wider than we thought and the leak could be just part of what is being investigated.

Hmmmm. Hope to hell this breaks before the election. With Cooper released - it could now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. If they did flip Hannah, Libby might have decided to put his spin on it
and deal with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. There is nothing about integrity with the Plame outing. Bush should
really want to see someone held accountable for such a treasonous act. However, this is about Bush being spiteful and yet again using his bag of dirty tricks to hurt people for his re-election and protection. These folks are not going down easy, they'll fight all the way because the whole Republican party will be at risk if the huge scams and secrets come out. This is a secret government run by corrupt people who do not worry about pardons, they worry about the public backlash to hang them from the highest tree for their lies. This has the potential to ruin the Republican party for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Integrity - yep, Ruining the Republic party for good - nah?
Watergate was not that long ago.

The Republican recovered from that--the electorate (such as it is) barely understand the facts and issues surrounding the Plame matter.

Thank you U.S. cable media outlets.
An educated electorate -- Rove's worst nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC