Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From ludicrous to lethal, the government has lots of secrets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 07:17 PM
Original message
From ludicrous to lethal, the government has lots of secrets
"There are too many secrets" and maybe too many secret-makers, said Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., chairman of the Government Reform Committee's national security panel. There are 3,978 officials who can stamp a document "top secret," "secret" or "confidential" under multiple sets of complex rules.

No one knows how much is classified, he said, and the system "often does not distinguish between the critically important and comically irrelevant."


"The tone is set at the top," Shays said.

"This administration believes the less known the better," added the Connecticut Republican, noting sadly he was speaking of a GOP administration. "I believe the more known the better."

The panel's ranking Democrat, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, noted that former President Clinton directed that in cases of doubt, the lowest or no classification be used. But in 2003, President Bush ordered officials to use the more restrictive level.



Aftergood cited the "secret" stamp on Army Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba's report of "numerous incidents of sadistic, blatant and wanton criminal abuses" inflicted on Iraqi inmates at Abu Ghraib prison.
more
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20040824-1500-governmentsecrets.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hell just froze over.
I know Shays goes off the res now and then, but this is jaw-dropping for a repug under Delay and his enforcers. Wanna bet he's threatened with a primary challenge in 2006? If they could do it now they would, but it's too late for this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder what is actually in the Roswell report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right on!
Edited on Tue Aug-24-04 08:53 PM by Dancing_Dave
We need to press this issue all the way home! :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. There are a lot more than 3,978 who can do it
The 3,978 are "original classification authorities." These people decide when something new should be classified and how high to mark it.

There are also "derivative classification authorities" and there are a shitload of them--probably five times the number of OCAs.

The thing that gets me about the Taguba Report: Army Regulation 380-5 specifically says "potential for embarrassment to the government" is not grounds for classification. That report should have never been classified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. A former dictator's cocktail preferences
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC