Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Police violate ban on videotaping protesters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rawstory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 07:36 PM
Original message
Police violate ban on videotaping protesters
Edited on Sun Aug-29-04 07:37 PM by rawstory
Okay, try two: Here's the full photos we've received. If DU wants to move this to GD again, it's your call, but I don't understand what more proof you need for this to be news. This from The Raw Story: http://rawstory.com

New York City police have violated an agreement which legally prohibits them from videotaping protesters. The photographs, acquired by RAW STORY this evening, show a police officer in Times Square videotaping protesters who are not engaged in illegal activity.

The photographer submitted the officer’s badge and precinct number to authorities.

Under law, unless there is an actual crime taking place, or reason to believe that one was about to – more than simply the protest march itself – the NYPD cannot videotape activists as a result of a 1971 class-action lawsuit filed by activists who accused police of using dossiers and undercover agents to punish lawful dissent.

http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=265





http://nyc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/106319/index.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did they have a permit to protest?
Edited on Sun Aug-29-04 07:39 PM by Eric J in MN
If not, do protests without permits fall into the category of activity which can be videotaped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rawstory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, you don't need a permit.
Here's what the Village Voice has to say about the law:

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0251/lee.php

The NYPD relinquished its spying autonomy as a result of a 1971 class-action suit filed by a diverse group of activists who accused police of using dossiers and undercover agents to chill and punish lawful dissent. Officials eventually admitted as much. In a historic settlement over a decade later, police promised to heed certain guidelines and be monitored by an oversight body when investigating constitutionally protected activity. Federal Judge Charles Haight signed the settlement—known as the Handschu agreement after one of the plaintiffs—into effect in 1985.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. locking
when it's reported by a news organisation, feel free to post with a link, as per LBN rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC