Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judicial Watch says Kerry once took laundered funds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:28 PM
Original message
Judicial Watch says Kerry once took laundered funds
Warning - from Scaife's rag.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/election/s_247030.html

A Washington, D.C., public interest group has released FBI documents it says indicates Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry accepted laundered contributions from the Chinese government during his 1996 Senate re-election campaign.
The organization Judicial Watch also contends that in exchange for the donations, Kerry might have arranged meetings between federal government officials and Chinese aerospace executives.

"These disturbing FBI documents raise further questions about Sen. Kerry's involvement in what looks like a quid pro quo -- cash for meetings -- with the communist Chinese," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement.

The Kerry campaign had no immediate comment.

The Carthage Foundation, which is controlled by Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Publisher Richard M. Scaife, annually contributes money to Judicial Watch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....what an old debunked charge.
They went after Kerry when they went after Clinton and there was no THERE there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slojim240 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. "Laundered funds?" Must have been from Pat Robertson.
I bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't he give it back? Fercrissakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. I think so:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaIndie Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. man, just when I thought the Repube attacks could get no lower
Call Guiness, Bush is somehow starting to bash more than the 2000 primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Librechik sez Bush once engaged in insider trading
why no investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Judicial Watch is a Scaife front
Scaife's Money Aids Judicial Watch
By Brooks Jackson/CNN

WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, June 10) -- Larry Klayman, leader of the group Judicial Watch, calls himself a conservative watchdog. He denies he is in it for the money and says he is just after the truth about the Clinton Administration.
Klayman

"I take it to heart when I see the government not telling the truth, not doing the right thing and covering up," Klayman says.

Klayman subpoenaed Clinton fund-raiser John Huang in 1996. This year he forced former Clinton aide Harold Ickes to testify and got Pentagon spokesman Ken Bacon to admit under oath he leaked damaging information about Clinton accuser Linda Tripp.

Tax records show Klayman's tax-exempt group, Judicial Watch, was just a shoestring operation in 1996, with total revenues of less than $68,000.

But now it comes out that Judicial Watch received $550,000 in 1997 from the Carthage Foundation, funded by Pittsburgh billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife.
More ...
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/06/11/klayman.jackson/


Download the free poster/sign here:
http://ediablo.com/eDiabloGallery.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. wonder how far down on rove's list of "lies to spread about kerry"
this is. obviously, right below "get a bunch of slimeballs together to say they don't think kerry deserves his purple hearts." and several notches below "portray kerry's wife as a bitch."

i just wonder if this is #8 on rove's list, # 121, #52, or what. and i wonder how many other rovian tricks little karl has up his sleeve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good old Eric Heyl...
...ran the story on the people wanting to unseal estate records of the late Sen. H. John Heinz III.

Thank god for reporters with no agenda. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. And they have so much credibility!
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Go Cheney yourselves, Judicial Watch n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. well, you've got to hand it to these lowlifes . . .
Edited on Thu Sep-02-04 05:05 PM by TaleWgnDg
the Richard Mellon Scaife crowd sure and hell does know how to make hay from the Information Age. Yup, merely plaster a "story" (no matter about its veracity) all over and it will run all by itself . . . whether it's the untruthful smears from disgrunted Nam vets or an overblown "job" in the Oval Office (excuse the pun). When repeated often enough it becomes an important "truth." Of course, as with any gossip, it works better if salacious and/or sensationalistic.

It's unfortunate that these accusations need to be countered and countered IMMEDIATELY, or suffer that it will stick as a "truth."

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/06/11/klayman.jacks ... /
("Judicial Watch received $550,000 in 1997 from the Carthage Foundation, funded by Pittsburgh billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife.")

edited to add: HOLY CRAP, Larry's running for Senate in FLORIDA!!
http://www.klaymansenate.com/about.htm (read carefully his biased "bio" here too)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey Judicial Watch ....Look at Cheney and Halliburton
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. and a bush brother is in cahoots with jiang zemin's son in a
venture in china.... gimme a break...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. This might be good....
If they are burping dead stories, they might be dry.

Once again, it's up to the media. If they go with Larry of Judicial Watch and their bosses in the corporations - GE, Murdoch, Time-Warner in partnership with the wily right and Scaife, then it will be an all out effort just like the lies were repeated about Gore.

If this is a dry story, an empty well...it will be easier to fight and maybe some so-called journalist will speak out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. This bilge seems so far to be only on the wingnut sites. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. And we are supposed to believe that Kerry
is so destitute that he would need contributions from anyone, much less Chinese? I cannot get my head around the idea that people can be so blindly loyal to an administration that has no interest in 99% of them except as a source of tax revenue, that they will make up irrational and ignorant lies to help them. What's worse is the mountainous volume of awful truth about that same administration that they will willfully ignore. This has to be the result of some kind of gene pool erosion. These people are mentally ill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
19.  They are in trouble. Rubbing hands with glee.
If things were going their way they would have the necessary boost from this convention and would not need to drop pianos on Kerry right now. They only go to Scaife when they have no legitimate ammo. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. Larry Klayman is back to his old ways
you know he was the one that started the Cheney Energy Policy lawsuits, but he's best known for this thousands of nuisance lawsuits against Clinton. Wait, didn't Bush say he'll bring an end to nuisance lawsuits

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC