Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China to invite bidding on nuclear power plants

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 07:36 PM
Original message
China to invite bidding on nuclear power plants
http://english.people.com.cn/200409/07/eng20040907_156124.html

China will put up a number of nuclear power projects for public bidding in the next one or two months, said a senior official Monday in Sydney.

Vice Minister Zhang Guobao in charge of the State Development and Reform Commission told the World Energy Congress here that the projects will involve mega-watts pressurized water reactor nuclear power stations.

The projects will be the first in China's new nuclear power stations to be built over the next 16 years that will add a total of 30 million mega-watts to the country's power production capacity.

China's nuclear power production now only constitutes about 1.8 percent of the total electric power generated, but the rate will rise to 4 percent by 2020, he said.

Coal will continue to be the main energy source for China in the future, while the production of nuclear and renewable energy will be "moderately increased" to deliver sustainability, said Zhang.

<snip>

I'll bet Dubya steps up and tells 'em they can't have 'em.
Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. China has long had
nuclear power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaRuth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. does halliburton or the caryle group
build nuke plants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't know for sure, but Canada's CANDU and Bechtel
worked together in China on at least 2 units that went online on budget and ahead of schedule - I don't know if the CANDU reactor is a pressurized water reactor (PWR) - the kind mentioned in the article. The other type is a BWR or boiling water reactor. GE and Westinghouse (and combustion enginering?) used to be big in the states. Two firms would get the job I imagine, a reactor Engineering firm and an architectural firm (for the bldgs, etc).

In the US, it would take 10 yrs to plan and build one I bet, in China, it probably would take 3 - less red tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Canada Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) are PWR's...
or rather Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors (PHWR).

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes, Halliburton KBR is a HUGE nuke engineering company
They are among the biggest in the business and it is KILLING us all.

see www.radiation.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WVhill Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Neither Halliburton or the Carlye Group have ever built a nuke.
Most of the companies that built them in the past were merged into other companies. Bechtel is probably one of the few American companies that has the engineering and management resources to build a nuclear power plant. While a supplier such as Westinghouse which no longer exists as an independent business or GE has the the ability to put together an advanced design nuclear steam supply system, you still need an engineering/construction firm to design and build the facilities, install the equipment along with all the electrical, piping and instrumentation and go through the startup process which alone can take a significant period of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Kellog Brown and Root is a subsidiary of Halliburton and ENGINEERS
nukes

I guess the actual construction may be Bechtel etc. -- but they do so in collusion with Halliburton

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WVhill Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I've never known Bechtel to partner with another construction company.
The one possible exception was TMI where the DOE forced GPU to accept Bechtel as the general manager of the cleanup. At that time Catalytic, since bought out, had the maintenance contract which meant that Bechtel couldn't go to the hall for crafts, they had to work through Catalytic. It was pretty ugly and not something Bechtel chose to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I was wrong - They DO construct nukes:
here's a link or two:

p://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/profiles/haliburton/haliburton.htm

http://www.endgame.org/halliburton.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I bet ole Rummy jumps on the bandwagon
He certainly had no problem with profiting from North Korea's nuclear power plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does China design their own power plants?
Western designs are safe, but I would worry if China may try to cut corners because of their energy crunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WVhill Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. At the height of nuclear plant construction there were only 4 companies
that built almost all of the NSSS in the US. Designing a nuclear steam supply system is not a trivial task. The Chinese will probably require a technology transfer so they do it themselves in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. China's government is much more corrupt that even BushCo is.
Edited on Mon Sep-06-04 11:47 PM by w4rma
Therefore, I fully expect that whomever gets the contract for this will be allowed to cut major corners and jet out of that country with millions more in their bank accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WVhill Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. You are correct. The big boys make Bushco look like chump change.
You need to watch how the successful bidder manages the process. If they set up a different corporate entity, then you can assume there's some sort of risk involved that the general public may not be privy to.

As for the kickbacks. Absolutely. The mess involving a lawsuit between a country and a US company years ago had a basis in fact. It wasn't proven in court but years later I talked to the bagman that carried the cash to Switzerland to make the deposit. He worked for the company in an accounting position. He was gone by the time the supoenas arrived. There's a reason cash was used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Not quite: Bushco and China are LIKETHIS and are equally corrupt
The Bushes opened up China when GHWBush was Nixon's ambassador to China and Bushco got a major foothold there making BILLIONS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. China, India lead revival of nuclear power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC