http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1151-2004Sep6.htmlBy Paul Farhi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 7, 2004; Page A02
Separated by 16 years, two of the most famous and controversial TV ads in presidential campaign history share a remarkable set of traits. Both were launched by nominally independent groups, not by the candidates themselves. Both aired in just a few small markets, gaining widespread exposure only through news media coverage. Both were denounced as inaccurate and unfair.
And both the "Willie Horton" spot of 1988 and the 2004 campaign's initial commercial by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth slammed a Democrat from Massachusetts and helped a Republican candidate named George Bush.
The Horton ad caused a huge media stir when it ran during the fall of the race involving Vice President George H.W. Bush and Massachusetts Gov. Michael S. Dukakis, the Democratic nominee. The ad, launched by a group called the National Security Political Action Committee, showed a mug shot of a black convict named William Horton (although he was never known as "Willie," the ad referred to him that way) who had attacked an Oxon Hill, Md., couple while free under a Massachusetts prison furlough program overseen by Dukakis. The ad was intended to highlight allegations that Dukakis was soft on crime, but critics saw it as an attempt to stir up racial fears.
The commercial aired last month by a group of Vietnam-era naval veterans known as Swift Boat Veterans for Truth was also denounced by Democrats. That ad questioned Democratic nominee John F. Kerry's Vietnam service record, which has been a centerpiece of Kerry's campaign.
For academics who study campaign rhetoric and advertising, the parallels between the two commercials are striking.
<snip>