Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Conceding Rebels Control Regions of Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 10:37 PM
Original message
U.S. Conceding Rebels Control Regions of Iraq
As American military deaths in Iraq operations surpassed the 1,000 mark, top Pentagon officials said Tuesday that insurgents controlled important parts of central Iraq and that it was unclear when American and Iraqi forces would be able to secure those areas.
As of late Tuesday night, the Pentagon's accounting showed that 998 service members and three Defense Department civilians had been killed in Iraq operations.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Gen. Richard B. Myers, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference that the American strategy in retaking rebel-held strongholds hinged on training and equipping Iraqi forces to take the lead. Mr. Rumsfeld said Iraqi officials understood they must regain control of the insurgent safe havens. "They get it, and will find a way over time to deal with it,'' he said.

But General Myers said the Iraqi forces would probably not be ready to confront insurgents in those areas until the end of this year.
Their comments, which came after a two-day spike in violence in Iraq led to a surge in American military deaths, represented an acknowledgment that the Americans had failed to end the insurgency in important Sunni-dominated areas and in certain Shiite enclaves. Fighting raged on Tuesday in Sadr City, in Baghdad, as Shiite militiamen loyal to Moktada al-Sadr ended a self-declared cease-fire. The officials' assessment also underscored the difficulty of pacifying Iraq in time for elections scheduled for January. The cities of greatest rebel control are Ramadi, Falluja, Baquba and Samarra, in the so-called Sunni triangle, west and north of Baghdad, where Saddam Hussein remains popular and many forces loyal to him have gathered strength.

There is increasing concern in the administration over plans for the election, with some officials saying that if significant parts of the Sunni areas cannot be secured by January, it may be impossible to hold a nationwide balloting that would be seen as legitimate. Putting off the elections, though, would infuriate Iraq's Shiite majority. The elections are for an assembly that is to write a new constitution next year.Mr. Rumsfeld said that Prime Minister Ayad Allawi recognized that his government could not continue to allow rebel control in crucial areas of the country, but that it would take time for him to determine how to proceed.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/08/politics/08policy.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rebels and insurgents?
How 'bout the invaders, colonialists, imperialists, occupiers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. We were rebels and insurgents to the British in 1776
We thought we were Americans. I never thought much of calling Iraqis "rebels and insurgents" in their own country. How about Iraqi citizens instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush will send in another 100,000 troops after the election
Either to screw President-elect Kerry or to prepare the nation for a much more significant and bloody war in Iraq duirng his second term (that would require a draft).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseygirltoo Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. From whose army?
We don't have another 100,000 troops to send
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. 140,000 troops is not enough to control the country ...
now that Bush has f*cked it so bad

600,000 isn't enough troops now ...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. 550,000 troops wasn't enough to "pacify" Vietnam
Iraqis want american invaders out of their country.

It's a no-brainer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. I must say that it was thoughtful of them to confirm what everyone knew
anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, what have we here--rationalization for an early withdrawal?
Is THAT the October surprise--the beginning of some of the troops? Did we not leave Viet Nam where it was clear it had become pointless? He could always put them back after we wins the election--and the draft!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bad news on all fronts for shrub tonite... eh?
:eyes: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well ain't that just peachy!
You can say Cluster**CK boys and girls. Sure you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Follow the OIL and it's pipes! Who cares about the rest.
Build a Super Sucking Nuclear Powered Oil Pump and get it over with. Bring our troops home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is lead story on NYT front page -- nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. give iraq back to the iraqis n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. Mission Accomplished!!!
FUBAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yup, what a winner. He's really quite the success, isn't he?
And to think we all doubted his ability to handle the Presidency.



What an imposter.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. "secure those areas"
And here I thought that Iraqis were liberated. Aren't those Iraqis securing their own cities?

This is REALLY PISSIN' me OFF!!!!!!!!!!!

What the Fuck is the matter with the Goddamn Dems in Congress? Are they all on heavy tranqs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. See! They told you it would be a "cakewalk"
In all of this bad news about a war they lied their way into and horribly mismanaged something is lost-the burgeoning flower clean up industry in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC