Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEC Says Group Can't Use Media Exemption (The Right Loses One!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 01:45 PM
Original message
FEC Says Group Can't Use Media Exemption (The Right Loses One!)
Edited on Thu Sep-09-04 01:46 PM by khephra
FEC Says Group Can't Use Media Exemption

SHARON THEIMER

Associated Press


WASHINGTON - A conservative group isn't entitled to a media exemption that would have let it run election-time ads promoting a book that criticizes Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, election officials ruled Thursday.

snip..........

The law bans the use of corporate money for ads that clearly identify a federal candidate, air in places where the candidate is on the ballot, and appear within one month of the primary and two months of the general election. It exempts news stories, commentaries or editorials aired on television or radio unless the outlets are owned by political groups, parties or candidates.

Citizens United, which is incorporated, argued it should be able to use the media exemption to run election-time ads for a book called "The Many Faces of John Kerry: Why This Massachusetts Liberal is Wrong for America."

The group wants to run ads for the book, written by its president, David Bossie, and a documentary film on the Democratic candidate and his running mate, John Edwards.

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/special_packages/election2004/9620086.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Since when..................
has the right played by the rules and followed the letter of the law? I know, in a perfect world they wouldn't have a chance, but I'm sure they'll get them on the air somehow, these are REPUBLICANS remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Smith Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sorry, but there is something terribly wrong, when
certain groups have free speech rights, and others don't, and the government gets to decide who does and who doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is true
I hate all these campaign media ads on television, but you are right. This campaign law stinks when it is viewed in light of free speech rights.

One by one they are chipping away at all our personal freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I have to respectfully disagree--we're not talking about free speech
per se. You can always stand on the street corner and yell if you want to. This web-site is not going to get shut down before the election. You are protected by the first amendment from prosecution for attacking a politician's character for instance.

What is in question is the use of broadcast media, who are only allowed to use frequency bandwidth by gov't fiat.

This is important to regulate: otherwise, the right of a free press would belong only to the man WHO OWNS ONE. (Even more so than it is now.)

This isn't a free speech issue as much as a fair speech issue in my mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What about GOP-related sites
that promote this book?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Smith Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The point is that the government gets to decide
which is a legitimate news organization, and which is not; which editorials are legitimate, and which are not. This is very dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The government has always had that power!
it comes from the fact that it requires a license to broadcast on the PUBLIC airwaves. Technically, the government could take action to shut down CBS tomorrow if it violated FCC rules....

Can't do that to newspapers- only broadcasters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC