should definitely take a look at those documents
The highly confidential papers represent one of the most serious leaks Downing Street has ever had to confront - both because of the extremely restricted nature of their circulation and the embarrassment they may cause senior US figures named in the memos - and will prompt a major Whitehall mole hunt. Last night speculation was focusing on the Butler inquiry into the intelligence gathered in Iraq, which was given thousands of confidential documents detailing the run-up to war.
"This is the magic bullet," one senior anti-war Labour MP said last night. " We will force this issue on the agenda and that will skewer him. Iraq has blown up in the coalition's faces, but these documents show that they knew of the dangers all along and still went ahead."
The collection of documents leaked to the Daily Telegraph included secret personal memos sent to Blair by his chief policy adviser Sir David Manning, Straw and Peter Ricketts, policy director at the Foreign Office.
Most tellingly, Manning warned that President George Bush had no answers to big questions, such as "what happens on the morning after" the removal of a man identified as one of the world’s most potent security threats. The top-level assessments also posed the threat of a successor regime "reverting to type", turning into a dictatorship, and ultimately attempting to develop the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) presented as a key motive for the military action.
The most damaging passages concern British officials' widespread scepticism about the US case for invading, with one Cabinet Office briefing paper citing the success of the Afghanistan invasion, distrust of the UN and 'unfinished business from 1991' as factors.
The Prime Minister was also advised he would have to "wrong foot" Saddam into giving the allies an excuse for war, and that British officials believed Bush merely wanted to complete his father's "unfinished business" in a "grudge match" against Saddam. The excruciating revelations suggested Blair was aware of the Americans’ intention to force "regime change" in Iraq.He added: "The idea that we did not have a plan for afterwards is simply not correct. We did and we have unfolded that plan, but there are people in Iraq who are determined to stop us."
The documents flatter the Foreign Office, suggesting it accurately foresaw many of the problems now engulfing Iraq - plus some that never transpired, such as the imposition of a 'Sunni strongman' after a coup. Donald Anderson, chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, yesterday praised Straw's 'great prescience'.
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1307907,00.html