Thursday, September 23, 2004
GAIL KINSEY HILL
Oregon utility regulators on Wednesday rejected Texas Pacific Group's
sweetened bid for Portland General Electric and said it would not approve the
deal unless the investment firm agreed to cut utility rates by $75 million.
....
Under state law, the PUC can sanction a change in utility ownership
only if "net benefits" accrue to ratepayers. Generally, benefits have
been interpreted to mean rate relief.
After the PUC staff sharply rejected the plan, Texas Pacific crafted a
more detailed bid that included rate reductions. The cuts would show
up as rate credits of $3 million annually, beginning in 2007 and lasting
through 2011, Texas Pacific said in a PUC filing submitted on Aug. 16.
....
Texas Pacific shouldn't be asked to meet such a high standard because
it is an investment firm, not an energy company, and can't create the
cost savings of more "synergistic" mergers.
The Citizens' Utility Board, an influential consumer watchdog group, is
asking for at least one more significant commitment from Texas Pacific.
It wants the buyout firm to guarantee that it will take PGE public when
the time comes to cash in, said Bob Jenks, CUB's executive director.
....
The goal, Jenks said, "is to get to a locally headquartered, locally
operated, independent, stable, long-term situation," similar to PGE's
status pre-Enron.
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/business/109594061189030.xml