Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The service question (US NEWS and WORLD REPORT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Blecht Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-04 11:52 PM
Original message
The service question (US NEWS and WORLD REPORT)
Edited on Sat Sep-11-04 11:52 PM by Blecht
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/040920/usnews/20guard.htm

    A review of President Bush's Guard years raises issues about the time he served
    By Kit R. Roane

    Last February, White House spokesman Scott McClellan held aloft sections of President Bush's military record, declaring to the waiting press that the files "clearly document the president fulfilling his duties in the National Guard." Case closed, he said.

    But last week the controversy reared up once again, as several news outlets, including U.S. News, disclosed new information casting doubt on White House claims.

    A review of the regulations governing Bush's Guard service during the Vietnam War shows that the White House used an inappropriate--and less stringent--Air Force standard in determining that he had fulfilled his duty. Because Bush signed a six-year "military service obligation," he was required to attend at least 44 inactive-duty training drills each fiscal year beginning July 1. But Bush's own records show that he fell short of that requirement, attending only 36 drills in the 1972-73 period, and only 12 in the 1973-74 period. The White House has said that Bush's service should be calculated using 12-month periods beginning on his induction date in May 1968. Using this time frame, however, Bush still fails the Air Force obligation standard.

    Moreover, White House officials say, Bush should be judged on whether he attended enough drills to count toward retirement. They say he accumulated sufficient points under this grading system. Yet, even using their method, which some military experts say is incorrect, U.S. News 's analysis shows that Bush once again fell short. His military records reveal that he failed to attend enough active-duty training and weekend drills to gain the 50 points necessary to count his final year toward retirement.

    The U.S. News analysis also showed that during the final two years of his obligation, Bush did not comply with Air Force regulations that impose a time limit on making up missed drills. What's more, he apparently never made up five months of drills he missed in 1972, contrary to assertions by the administration. White House officials did not respond to the analysis last week but emphasized that Bush had "served honorably."

    ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have a sugestion, as well as a couple vets I know
let bush finish his service with his unit, which happens to be... in the sandbox... yep, he may even ahem face the risks of war that he has asked others to shoulder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I second that suggestion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmooses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. We need
Bush in a Under-armored Humvee in Falluja looking for a vest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-04 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. the press must have just had enough time to examine all of the paperwork
and reach these conclusions. everyone seems to be releasing stories like this at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank God! The Media is finally (hopefully) looking at the content of
the allegations and not the friggin typing of the documents.

This can't be blown off as "gossip" and "trash" like they will call the Kitty Kelley book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here's the deal, Dubya:
You go join up with your TANG unit RIGHT NOW, serve the remaining time due, and we'll stop saying you skipped out on your obligation. Deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. WOW ! Finally, this story has legs....USA media is FINALLY looking
at bush* war-military service records, and realizing that BUSH* LIED about his military service too....beefed it up to be much more than it was, and LIED BY OMISSION, failing to mention that he never showed up, despite priviledged affirmative-action-for-the-rich....


this story is growing, and getting bigger by the day....


the next step: court-ordered Community service in Houston's inner-city....where's the court records, and witnesses? must be out there somewhere....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. Can you see him in the hood?! ROTFL

Cowboy hat on saying, "hey dude,what is hap o ning?"

"What you like to do some Coke, I mean Coca Cola dude?"

He would last about 5 minutes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bwaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!
Sorry 'bout that, but I feel much better now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. They have two more documents, one of them names Bath...
along with Bush!

Look at this pdf:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-09-09bushdocs.pdf


(thanks to ramblin_dave for this find)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Great stuff
thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. nothing about it is " lbn" here at du.....
----well this was posted several weeks ago for over two or three days..this was figured out by someone who saw the records and knew how to read them...only old guys and gals my age remember how those payroll records were recorded. yes we and several other sites had it first-the rest of the world is just catching up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. If that standard were applied
there would be very few mainstream press articles listed on LBN at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. These are the same docs CBS used
Edited on Sun Sep-12-04 01:11 AM by RevRussel
Which is terrific! CBS has the money and resources for verifying. This angle should now be fairly complete. KKKarl missed one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. LBN is the welcome USNews report. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. Something new (as far as I can tell) in this article.
I've never seen actual criticism anywhere in a mainstream publication before this one. It's not severe, but it's emphatic:
Some experts say they remain mystified as to how Bush obtained an honorable discharge. Lawrence Korb, a former top Defense Department official in the Reagan administration, says the military records clearly show that Bush "had not fulfilled his obligation" and "should have been called to active duty."
(snip)

The regulations must be followed, adds James Currie, a retired colonel and author of an official history of the Army Reserve. "Clearly, if you were the average poor boy who got drafted and sent into the active force," he says, "they weren't going to let you out before you had completed your obligation."
(snip)
This seems like a BREAKTHROUGH in directness. Real seriousness about the subject has been avoided like the plague in our major media outlets. You'd have thought they had been asked to go out for a story on "Bigfoot" critters, festooned with garlands of pork chops.

Could it be a shadow of approaching, yet overdue responsibility from the media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. discussion that should have taken place 4 years ago
Edited on Sun Sep-12-04 04:00 AM by teryang
The fact that it is taking place now is indicative of discontent in the ranks of the registered social elites. The odd thing is that the resistance to Bush taking place seems sporadic. If it doesn't become a waterfall within four weeks it will be evidence that something is still very wrong with the American political system. It may not be enough to keep him from retaining power.

After all, a majority of the American people couldn't keep him out four years ago. I'm a fan of Lawrence Korb. An eminently reasonable defense expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. One question though . . . why is the article dated 9/20?
Is that the publication date for the issue it's going to run in? A typo?

I'm just curious.

The information backs up perfectly both the CBS story and the evaluation of the record by Gerald Lechliter http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/lechliter.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalcanuck Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Good question. I clicked on the date and it links to 'Current Issue'
for 9/20/04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. It must be when the magazine hits the stores?
They release the on line version first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. i'm sure that's what it is. if you look at paper issues of the major
weeklies they always post-date them on the front cover to coincide with the week they represent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
17. Kick!
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. Magazine date
The date shows the date the magazine is to be removed from shelves and replaced by a new magazine, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
21. This is important that a conservative news source would print this.
There is a link at the bottom of the article for commenting about the article. Please commend US News for printing it and encourage them to look farther at the other crimes of the Bush Crime Family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Didn't see that the first time. Thanks for mentioning it.
Edited on Sun Sep-12-04 12:31 PM by JudiLyn
On edit:

Sent them a message, and happy to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. kickie
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longhorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
25. What we need is an "average poor boy who got drafted"
to come forward and tell his story about how he was sent to Vietnam because he didn't fulfill his National Guard obligation! In fact, we need lots of them to tell their stories -- or maybe their wives and mothers they left behind when they were killed.

"Clearly, if you were the average poor boy who got drafted and sent into the active force," he (James Currie, a retired colonel and author of an official history of the Army Reserve) says, "they weren't going to let you out before you had completed your obligation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. This average poor boy draftee....
Got an "Advance to GO' card and never saw any National Guard service...
You know what I mean, Vern?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrate Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. It won't be easy to find such a person. If you were spared the
Edited on Sun Sep-12-04 01:31 PM by wrate
horrors of going to Vietnam by the National Gard Service, you would have to be an idiot to miss that and get sent to Vietnam after all. Wouldn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longhorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Very true!
But there was a DU'er who said he missed some of his drills and ended up in active duty, though not sent to Vietnam. So these people do exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. That would be me. (I know 2 other guys who had the same experience)
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. The Swifties should take their boat out of the water

and shut the ! up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. But...but...how do I explain this to my 6-year old son???
How do I explain to Michael that the President of the United States lied to the American People???

:cry:Six-year-old Michael after learning that President Bush lied to him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. tell him that even though he is prez
he can still be dishonest.

He's not God, you know. A kid needs to understand that politicians are NOT perfect. And what better politician to use as an example of imperfection than dumbya???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldenOldie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. The media chose to ignore this in 2000
Much as they are attempting to do in 2004. The media daily attacked John McCain with the Rove script most viciously not only that John McCain was mentally impaired due to his POW status, that he had become a POW traitor for ratting on his fellow POW's, he had an illegitimate black baby (an adopted Bangladesh baby), his wife was a drug user, he was unfit for command. Does any of this sound familiar. Fellow Repub Reps fell in line with the Rove dirty policies and attacked John McCain. UNFIT FOR COMMAND

The journalists and the Media knew full well at that time that George W. Bush's ANG was false and they fell in line with the Rove machine and the Bush Family. They failed the American citizens then and they are failing them again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Tell him the pResident has been very ill for a long time and that this
illness is in his head, and has made it so he does not know how to tell the truth.

Unless your 6 year old already knows what "pathological liar" means.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. Tell him we know for sure it isn't a yeast infection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. Suffer the little children . . .
. . . at the boots of the PUKES.

I had to console my sobbing 6 year old niece :cry: after her freep father kicked her little hand with his boot after she had allegedly allowed a toy flag to touch the ground after the 4th of July parade. I told her that only pResident *bush is allowed to harm toy flags when he signs them with his Sharpie and hands them out as campaign souvenirs. There was no explaining the discarded toy flags littering the asphault parking lots and falling out of overstuffed garbage cans on our way to the fireworks.

There is no explanation for the little ones. They'll figure it out on their own in a few years. Boy are they gonna be pissed.

TYY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
34. NBC news shilling for aWol* again tonight....
totaly dismissing CBS's report. Perhaps I should send them this article to set them straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
38. I'm kicking this because I think this is an important story!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
41. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakemonster11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
43. Ridiculous.
I don't understand how the Bush administration can just keep repeating something and somehow make it "true."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Jim Morrison once said:
"Whoever controls the media controls the mind".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sidpleasant Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
46. Did anyone on the TANG list ahead of Bush get drafted?
Here's a research project for the media: did any of the several hundred desperate guys on the TANG waiting list who Bush leaped over for his spot in the "Champagne Squadron" get drafted? If so, did any of them (God forbid) get killed in Viet Nam? Imagine a TV ad with the camera slowly zooming in on a name on the Viet Nam Memorial while a voice over says "this man died in Viet Nam because he lost his space in the Texas Air National Guard to George W. Bush".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Ooooh,gave me chills
Now THAT would be a slam dunk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hailtothechimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Greg Palast found a name on the wall........
It was maybe a year ago. The guy had the same lottery number as Sugarcoat did, but he got drafted and went to Vietnam. I can't recall the name, but it shouldn't be too hard to find the story online.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
48. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC