Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Drops Charge Against Accused Spy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 08:50 PM
Original message
U.S. Drops Charge Against Accused Spy
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040922/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/guantanamo_interpreter

The military on Wednesday dropped an espionage charge against a Muslim interpreter accused of spying at the camp for terror detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The development marks the third Guantanamo spy case to fall apart this year, despite vows by Attorney General John Ashcroft (news - web sites) and military officials to prosecute the alleged threats to the nation's security.

In a related story:
The Department Of Justice Is Forced to Admit Serious Error in the Detroit "Terrorist Cell" Case:
Judges' Key Role In Curbing "War on Terror" Excesses

"In late August, the Department of Justice submitted a remarkable memorandum of law to U.S. District Judge Gerald Rosen, the judge overseeing its prosecution of a suspected terrorist sleeper cell in Detroit.

In the memorandum, DOJ admitted its prosecution had been riddled with a "pattern of mistakes and oversights." For instance, it admitted that the prosecution deprived the defendants of important discoverable evidence - evidence it was required by law to produce. And it admitted that its lawyers had not been candid - to say the least - about this evidence. To the contrary, DOJ noted, the record of the case was "filled with misleading inferences that such material did not exist" - when actually, it did, and the defendants were legally entitled to it.

A year ago, Attorney General John Ashcroft boasted that this very prosecution was his first court victory in the war on terror. Since then, it has turned out to be his only such victory. And now, it's clear the prosecution was no victory at all - it was a debacle.

Due to the severity of its mistakes, DOJ asked Judge Rosen to reverse the defendants' convictions. The government sees "no reasonable prospect of winning" - apparently, either in its defense of the convictions, or in a new trial on the terrorism charges. (DOJ did, however, ask the judge for a new trial on document fraud charges.) Rosen granted the motion.

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/leavitt/20040922.html

But now they have Cat Stevens! Another victory for Ashcroft and Tom Ridge the Boy Wonder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is ashcroft incapable of prosecuting anything ?
Geesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dqueue Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yet another...
Yet another failure for this administration, at the taxpayers' expense. Amazing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. These False Arrests- Targetting Whistleblowers In Gitmo?
now that we know there is Pentagon/WH sanctioned torture going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC