Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calif. Gov. Vetoes Long-Term Energy Planning Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-04 10:01 PM
Original message
Calif. Gov. Vetoes Long-Term Energy Planning Bill
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Saturday vetoed a bill requiring electric utilities to develop long-range plans for meeting energy needs, a requirement backers said would ease the spike-and-drop pattern of California energy supply.

"The bill creates a redundant and burdensome energy procurement process that would steer the state back toward monopoly utilities without some of the consumer protections necessary to protect ratepayers," Schwarzenegger said in a statement.

The proposed "Reliable Electric Service Act of 2004" would have allowed utilities to recover from ratepayers some of the investment costs for building new generating capacity, if approved by the state's utility commission.

The California lawmaker who introduced the bill, Democratic Assembly speaker Fabian Nunez, had maintained it would protect consumers from sudden spikes in prices, which they have experienced in several recent years.

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=6332869&src=rss/ElectionCoverage§ion=news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Enron governor. He stopped the lawsuits against Enron, also. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Swartengroper
wants more deregulation, more of the scams . He was sat in on a meeting between the energy marketeers, and how they were scamming the deregulated market. He is a corporate head, anti enviornment , pro consolidation big capitol and he has no clue. But the sad truth is that many voted for a personna, and the pyranahs are back in Sacramento.The racist Wilson ,and the anti farm worker , labor , and forget the lil people, and have corporate welfare , Swartenegger don't have the people in mind .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Gropenfuhrer is just taking a page from the playbook of his "idol".
Adolf.

:puke:

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. well of COURSE he did
that's why we had the overhrow of Davis :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Another actor
"The bill creates a redundant and burdensome energy procurement process that would steer the state back toward monopoly utilities without some of the consumer protections necessary to protect ratepayers," Schwarzenegger said in a statement.

Ask him to explain it. Bet he can't. Just reading from the script, like Dumbya. And, rhetoric like this is just too confusing for the brainwashed masses to decipher...

Of course, it has one of those "framed" titles "Reliable"--whereas it is the exact opposite--UNreliable rates.

OUR WHOLE COUNTRY'S "GOVERNMENT" CONSISTS OF ONE BIG BAD SCRIPT BEING READ OFF BY A BUNCH OF GREEDY PUPPETS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Really, like he even knows what the word 'redundant' means....
Edited on Sun Sep-26-04 09:59 AM by Jade Fox
My first thought was that he doesn't know what he's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arianrhod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. California has no governor. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. Californias have to fight this...
What Schwarzenegger wants is to privatize the energy companies. The Rethugs want to privatize just about everything. They want to put more money in the pockets of big business without any protections for the consumers.

This musclebound Neanderthal has all kinds of plans for California.

Lets hope he has a harder time being legitimately re-elected than he had in muscling his way into the Governership with the help of Daryl Issa who funded the recall.

http://www.moderateindependent.com/v1i12puppet.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. necessary to protect ratepayers...
uh huh...yeah, poor California ratepayers have been taken to the cleaners by your buddy Kenny Boy. I find gropenator's concern for the ratepayer contrived.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. The tanning salons and sex with corpses were solved, enough work!
I heard yesterday, he just signed a bill restricting tanning salons use by teens - my first thought was: what was he NOT signing?
makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. his approval rating
unfortunately is in the mid 60s i think. I voted for gary coleman because i thought it was funny.not so funny now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Way to go. The GOP owns the media here and they spin everything
he does as though it's a good thing for us. Most Californians are obsessed with their own lives, work, play, etc and don't pay a bit of attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr E McSquare Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Voted for Gary Coleman? Wud you talkin bout willis?
and you wonder why you guys are the laughing stock of the country.
Pretty funny huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. Anyone remember the Linda Lovelace for President campaign?
Decades ago? She was a porn star. When I think of Arnold, I don't take him any more seriously than Lovelace... what has he done, exactly, that could qualify him for running California? He posed nude, he attended sex parties, he bragged about his sexual adventures, he was a steroid head, he was a body builder, then he was a really... really bad actor. Now HE'S deciding energy policy for California, and I'm supposed to buy that he knows what he's talking about?

He met with the Enron people LONG before the recall.. this was a setup, as it usually is with the GOP. The party of dirty tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC