Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bank officials to take the stand as BCCI case resumes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 09:14 AM
Original message
Bank officials to take the stand as BCCI case resumes
Edited on Mon Sep-27-04 09:15 AM by emad aisat sana
The Independent
By Julia Kollewe, Banking Correspondent
27 September 2004


The Bank of England, accused of "misfeasance" in its regulation of the fraud-ridden Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), will today resume its defence in the £1bn High Court case with witnesses, including the former governor Lord George, preparing to take the witness stand in the months ahead.

After a record six-month opening this year by the counsel for Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, which is representing about 6,500 UK depositors in BCCI, the Bank of England's counsel, Nicholas Stadlen QC, will today continue his defence. He began the Bank's case in mid-July before the court broke for a summer recess.

Mr Stadlen said then that allegations that 22 Bank of England officials acted dishonestly were "fundamentally implausible". The liquidators of BCCI argue the central bank acted recklessly by giving BCCI the go-ahead in 1980 to operate in Britain and failing to supervise it properly before revoking its licence in 1991.

Mr Stadlen opened his defence in July saying "after six months the empire strikes back", and told the court that liquidators must prove the central bank officials deliberately acted dishonestly and abused their power. Mr Stadlen said only one successful case of misfeasance had been reported in 300 years.
More:
http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/story.jsp?story=566100

As previously on DU Gen discussion:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2411891
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Remember, Kerry lead the fight against BCCI in this country....
He had the imagination and insight, as early as 1987, to go after these guys because they were laundering drug money and FUNDING TERRORISTS! He had to withstand enormous pressure from official and Establishment Washington for three years before Eliot Spitzer and the Feds took up the cause and shut BCCI down.
This is an excellent talking point for those confronted with the nonsense that Kerry has no credentials in the "war on terror."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The BCCI Affair: Kerry/Hank Brown Dec '92 report to CFR Senate
A Report to the Committee on Foreign Relations
United States Senate
by
Senator John Kerry and Senator Hank Brown
December 1992
102d Congress 2d Session Senate Print 102-140

See:
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Robert Morgenthau. Spitzer would have been pretty young still.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is great timing - I hope it makes headlines here
and all the major networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Make the headlines? I doubt it.
Did the fact that J. Bush is top manager of Riggs Bank made the headlines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. didn't make headlines when the case started,
wy would it now?

It's only the biggest court case ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC