Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox Hunts Student Voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:09 PM
Original message
Fox Hunts Student Voters
Juliana Zuccaro and Kelly Kraus thought they were exercising their civic rights and responsibilities on August 31 when, as officers of the Network of Feminist Student Activists at the University of Arizona in Tucson, they helped set up a voter-registration drive on the UA mall. Imagine their astonishment when the local Fox affiliate news team showed up and lit into the young women. "The reporter asked if we knew that we were potentially signing students up to commit felonies," Juliana told me--by registering out-of-state students to vote in Arizona. When Kelly then asserted that Arizona law requires only that those registering be resident in the state twenty-nine days before the election, Natalie Tejeda, the Fox reporter, insisted it was illegal to register students. On the news that night, student voter registration was the crime du jour:


Tejeda: What many don't realize is that legally, students from out of state aren't eligible to vote in Arizona because they're considered temporary residents.

Chris Roads : If they are only here to attend school and their intention is to immediately return to where they came from when school is over then they are not residents of the state of Arizona for voting purposes and they cannot register to vote here.

Tejeda: ...Those caught misrepresenting their residency can face a severe punishment.

Roads: The form in Arizona is an affidavit; it is a felony offense if you are lying on that form.

Tejeda: So how easy is it to get caught? Well, starting this past January all voter applications are cross-checked with the Motor Vehicles Department and Social Security Administration. If they find that you are falsifying your residency you could be prosecuted. At this time we don't know if anybody has yet been indicted, but Roads says one of the easiest things you can do to avoid all that is simply go online or pick up the phone, call your home state's elections office and ask for an absentee ballot.

....

Misguided youth or hardened criminals? They report, you decide

http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20041011&s=pollitt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fox as a tool of the Bush Criminals
Wants to hold down the ability to vote to anyone who isn't goose stepping, in time, with the Bush Criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. She (Kelly) had 'em by the short and curlies...
When it came to quoting Arizona law...they obviously had no real counter to that in their smooth, right-tilting brains!:mad:

FAUX: continuing the timeless tradition of "unfair and imbalanced" reporting!:eyes:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. the notion of "fair and balanced" reporting goes out the window . . .
when a "reporter" inserts herself into the story . . . there's a difference between reporting news and making news, and FAUX has crossed that line . . . not that I'm surprised, mind you . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm curious how the Fox reporter got turned on to this story?
I emailed the station and asked if they've looked into how they got snookered (or worse) into spreading GOP misinformation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Campus Crackdown: Fox News Attacks Student Voter Registration Effort
AMY GOODMAN: So how did this all change? Because there have been developments since, and there have been clarifying statements from the registrar and Fox has done another report. Sarah Ransom.

SARAH RANSOM: What we did is we looked at the Arizona State residency requirements for voters. It does say you need physical presence in the state and the intent to remain. We thought, what does intent to remain mean, and since the U.S. Supreme Court is authoritative on this issue, we decided to find out what the U.S Supreme Court said, and they say unequivocally in a case Symm v U.S. that a student -- there is no requirement that any student in order to establish that he is a resident of the place where he wishes to vote establish that he intends to remain there permanently or for any particular period of time. Therefore, when you look at the Arizona statute, simply, students need to have physical presence in Pima County and intent to remain for the 29 days before the election.

-------

SARAH RANSOM: Fox was relentless in attempting to portray the students as – for instance, we held a press conference on September 8 and they portrayed the students as defiantly registering to vote and telling the officials to come and get us and we have no limits to our right to vote and then, you know the phone calls kept coming. Pima County Recorder's office issued a retraction, stated that Fox had misinterpreted the law. Then on September 24, they ran another report where they stated that it was all the Pima County Recorder’s office, oh, but, if you are here for 29 days before the election, I guess you can go out and register to vote.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/27/1433241

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Fox had misinterpreted the law--if only Rather had thought of that alibi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not Only Fox
AMY GOODMAN: That was Chris Roads, the registrar. Sarah Ransom, can you explain what it is he said, because there have been developments since then.

SARAH RANSOM: Yes. What I was essentially claiming was that if you are a student, then you are -- basically, if you are from out of state, you are a temporary resident and therefore, you cannot vote or else when you sign the voter registration document, you will be committing fraud because you will be claiming to be a resident of Arizona. I mean, I also volunteered to register students to vote, and I was disturbed. So, I went and checked into this assertion and it took me about 20 minutes to realize that everything that Fox News was saying and what Chris Roads was saying was actually completely contrary to what the state of the law is in the National Presidential Election.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/27/1433241
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemFromMem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Call Governor Napolitano's Office
I'm sure the Attorney General in Arizona would be interested in going after organizations engaged in voter intimidation. She's been very active in the Kerry campaign and I suspect they would take an interest in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought there was a 1979 Supreme Court decision
that said students could consider their residence permanent for the purposes of voting? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. All across the nation, Voter Intimidation is being practiced quite
shamelessly and above board.

Of course, with the SCADS of Bushevik Voter Frauds well-established, particularly vacation-home voting, it is unsurprising that elements of the Empire would subscribe to a law enforcement policy (let alone a Propaganda Mouthpiece for THE PARTY like Faux "News") with as much of a double-standard as the Old Soviet Union.

Imperial Party Fraud, is left alone, uninvesigated and, if the truth be told, condoned.

My God, I can still remember when Amerika was free.

This is going on in virtually EVERY STATE.

thes monsters, with their evangelical/facsist notion that they may perform ANY EVIL, so long as it combats the Evil of their Subhuman (though the evangelicals don't go that far in their hearts) Foes

And that is us, and any Free American!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fox hunting is illegal
They should be in prison! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemStanding Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. No it's not
Fox and coyote are considered varmints and there is no limit on bagging them in most states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh dear, can they still hunt with horses and dogs
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 06:00 PM by sweetheart
I'm seeing a solution for tony blair's "hunt" wrinkle... that might
involve an ethnic cleansing of the "hunt" population to places where
"Fox and coyote are considered varmits and there is no limit on
bagging them"


My question then, is what size of bullet does it take to down a
FOX TV. Would a 30-naught 6 with a scope rifle take down a TV
station? Fox huntin is more interesting in the states than in the
UK, as in the states, its television!

PS, mate, welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eriffle Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. kinda hard to prove intent
I ran into the same problem with the young repugs here in WV. WV has appears to have similar voting residency regulations as AZ. It's hard to prove that someone won't leave their college town when they graduate. Or, how long they'll be there. I know people who've been in college ten years, or atleast in the college town for ten years. One doesn't have to go very far to see how lienient voter registration residency regulations are, just look at Dick Cheney. He registered in Wyoming at the last minute because he was registered in Texas and since both Bush and Cheney were registered in Texas, they couldn't recieve Texas's electoral vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. so fox is intimidating voters with their lies this time
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Stuff Like This Probably Won't Happen Here in Southern Colorado
The local Fox affiliate, when told they had to start carrying a local newscast, contracted with the local CBS affiliate to produce them. So you see the same people on both stations, with slightly different sets and different graphics.

But the reporting is the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC