Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Hometown Newspaper Endorses Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:39 PM
Original message
Bush's Hometown Newspaper Endorses Kerry
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 03:39 PM by neuvocat
No, its not a joke!

CRAWFORD, Texas (Reuters) - The newspaper in President Bush (news - web sites)'s adopted hometown of Crawford threw its support on Tuesday behind Bush's Democratic rival, Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites).



http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=615&u=/nm/20040928/pl_nm/campaign_endorsement_dc_1&printer=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Notice how short this article is. Notice how devoid of detail it is. (nt)
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 03:42 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Who cares.
It doesn't have to be very long. I'm sure that we'll find the article in the local paper for it soon anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. hmm. i guess bush will be canceling any of his want-ads for slave-labor
at the ranch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is called the Iconoclast
Considering the location, it is living up to its name, I guess. Of course, they may just be hoping he sells the pig farm and moves if he is defeated. It would probably improve property values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's who we need, small town paper's..
endorsements. Those are the papers local citizens read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where is he moveing next?
surely he won't let the crawford people get away with this.

....
Supreme Court will determine when cities may seize private land.
....
The same ones that appointed bush....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Read the beating the Iconclast gave bush! Too bad Yahoo didn't bother to.
Kerry Will Restore American Dignity

2004 Iconoclast Presidential Endorsement

Few Americans would have voted for George W. Bush four years ago if he had promised that, as President, he would:

-Empty the Social Security trust fund by $507 billion to help offset fiscal irresponsibility and at the same time slash Social Security benefits.

-Cut Medicare by 17 percent and reduce veterans' benefits and military pay.

-Eliminate overtime pay for millions of Americans and raise oil prices by 50 percent.

-Give tax cuts to businesses that sent American jobs overseas, and, in fact, by policy encourage their departure.

-Give away billions of tax dollars in government contracts without competitive bids.

-Involve this country in a deadly and highly questionable war, and

-Take a budget surplus and turn it into the worst deficit in the history of the United States, creating a debt in just four years that will take generations to repay.

These were elements of a hidden agenda that surfaced only after he took office.

The publishers of The Iconoclast endorsed Bush four years ago, based on the things he promised, not on this smoke-screened agenda.

(snip)

Once and for all, George Bush was President of the United States on that day. No one else. He had been President nine months, he had been officially warned of just such an attack a full month before it happened. As President, ultimately he and only he was responsible for our failure to avert those attacks.

We should expect that a sitting President would vacation less, if at all, and instead tend to the business of running the country, especially if he is, as he likes to boast, a "wartime president." America is in service 365 days a year. We don't need a part-time President who does not show up for duty as Commander-In-Chief until he is forced to, and who is in a constant state of blameless denial when things don't get done.

The re-election of George W. Bush would be a mandate to continue on our present course of chaos. We cannot afford to double the debt that we already have. We need to be moving in the opposite direction.

http://www.dailykos.com has more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I bet he does feel like a fool...
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 05:21 PM by sattahipdeep
....an he will get even....that's his motto.

:hi: thanks for link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC