Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unit's bleak July Iraq report not its first caution to Bush's White House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Clark4Prez Donating Member (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:51 PM
Original message
Unit's bleak July Iraq report not its first caution to Bush's White House
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/09/28/MNG5D904AB1.DTL

Washington -- The same intelligence unit that produced a gloomy report in July about the prospect of growing instability in Iraq warned the Bush administration about the potential costly consequences of an American-led invasion two months before the war began, government officials said Monday.

The estimate came in two classified reports prepared for President Bush in January 2003 by the National Intelligence Council, an independent group that advises the director of central intelligence. The assessments predicted that an American-led invasion of Iraq would increase support for political Islam and would result in a deeply divided Iraqi society prone to violent internal conflict.

One of the reports also warned of a possible insurgency against the new Iraqi government or U.S.-led forces, saying that rogue elements from Saddam Hussein's government could work with existing terrorist groups or act independently to wage guerrilla warfare, the officials said. The assessments also said a war would increase sympathy across the Islamic world for some terrorist objectives, at least in the short run, the officials said.

The contents of the two assessments had not been previously disclosed. They were described by the officials after two weeks in which the White House has tried to minimize the council's latest report, which was prepared this summer and read by senior officials early this month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Neocons are running the country like a business. War is their business
They are profiteers, not Americans. Keep getting the word out. It is more than lives for oil, it is much more basic: Lives for $$ pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. They could have just asked me
I could have told them that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schultzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. All of *'s businesses failed. This one will affect all of us. He has never
had to face his mistakes like the rest of us. Someone always did it for him or saved him from his actions. Now this careless, privileged, spoiled,booze pickled brain idiot is running and ruining our great country. Whose not Patriotic? GW Bush is not patriotic, because he does not place America first. He places business and money first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I saw a terrific freeper argument, the gist was that bush had to be
smart if he owned all those businesses and attended Yale and Harvard.
In fact, just about any below average person could do the same or better given the bush name and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. There is no way that GWB gets in Yale without his grandfather,
even in the 60's. There is no way in HELL that he gets in Harvard Business School with a C minus average unless he was bought in. I do not know about Yale but that does not work at Princeton today. To think that this pitiful excuse for a person is our president continues to entrall me. How did we let this happen? It has to stop NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good thing bush knew they were just guessing
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 05:39 PM by Jim__
The assessments predicted that an American-led invasion of Iraq would increase support for political Islam and would result in a deeply divided Iraqi society prone to violent internal conflict.


Paul Wolfowitz had a different guess. Just guesses. Nothing to distinguish between them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vogonity Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. With current troops/resourses in Iraq...
What do you think that the military can reasonably accomplish in Iraq at this time? Do we have the manpower to (re)take Basra, Falluja, and whatever other cities that we don't currently control? What can we accomplish over there besides being sitting ducks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What would it mean to "(re)take Basra, Falluja . . ."?
I'm not sure we ever had effective control of them in the first place; what control we had was illusory, as there has been a low-level resistance movement going on from before the day Baghdad "fell". (Remember the efforts of the Fedayeen Saddam in Nasiriyah during the drive to Baghdad?)

Or were you merely asking rhetorical questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC