Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attack on Academic Freedom What It Represents and What Needs to Be Done

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
dsnail Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:02 AM
Original message
Attack on Academic Freedom What It Represents and What Needs to Be Done
The rapid escalation of the spurious attacks targeting academic freedom is a phenomenon to be taken very seriously. The manner in which various rightwing groups are implicating university departments and faculty in “undermining national security” and in some cases “promoting terror” is shameful and disgusting. Attacks against Ward Churchill at the University of Colorado and Joseph Massad at Columbia University have been two of the most recent events in the series of well-funded attempts to wreak havoc upon one university department and professor after another....
http://www.lefthook.org/Politics/Ahmad042505.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'll repeat what I've said before.
Part of the criticism is valid. Part isn't. And neither affects academic freedom, to research and teach that research in the classroom.

Teaching _only_ that research gets into thornier questions, and isn't confined to politically charged topics, as is requiring that only certain views are judged defensible. This has little to do with politics, per se, and moves far beyond what the average "progressive" or "freeper" would possibly care about.

Moreover, a point lost on many people is that you can debate an issue in rational, calm, tones, or you can be intentionally inflammatory. Both are protected speech; but while I'd argue that the former is always covered by academic freedom and the latter isn't. Some research requires speech some find offensive, hats off to Haj Ross. You have a right, when tenured, to research as you will; but intentionally trying to piss off people in the name of "speaking truth to power"--couched in incendiary language that is virtually guaranteed to close the ears of "power" and shut down dialog, while energizing your political base, isn't academic freedom. It's goal is frequently to pick a fight, and no such fight can be decried as victimization just because the bully finds the fights either fair or he's possibly about to be out-bullied. I don't care whether you're on the right or the left. Academics are highly educated and can, presumably, choose their words with care (for which reason it turns out many English professors are more dysfluent than factory workers).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC