Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Caught Up in DNA's Growing Web --to take beyond

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 03:01 PM
Original message
Caught Up in DNA's Growing Web --to take beyond




http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/17/opinion/17levy.html?_r=1&th=&oref=slogin&emc=th&pagewanted=print

March 17, 2006

Op-Ed Contributor
Caught Up in DNA's Growing Web

By HARLAN LEVY
THE announcement this week that DNA from a paroled violent felon working as a bouncer matches that found on plastic ties used to bind a murdered graduate student highlights DNA's power to implicate people already in state databases.

Fifteen years ago, as a Manhattan homicide prosecutor, I was an aggressive proponent of taking DNA from convicted murderers, rapists and other violent felons so we could catch them when they committed crimes again. I even quit my day job to write a book likening the identification of criminals through DNA to the voice of God speaking on earth.
I still firmly believe in the power of DNA to catch the guilty and exonerate the innocent. This week's developments seem likely to vindicate that faith again. But for all this technology's promise, proposals by some to extend DNA databanks far beyond convicted felons, and even to the general population, go too far.

In the early 1990's, state legislatures did what many early proponents of DNA urged: they passed laws to take DNA from those convicted of murder, rape and other violent felonies. Then they enacted laws to take DNA from most convicted felons. Misdemeanor sex crimes were next, a logical, intelligent measure.

But the proposed next steps in DNA collection were more problematic. In 1998, New York City's police commissioner, Howard Safir, proposed that DNA be taken from all arrestees. And Gov. George Pataki has sought to take DNA from people convicted of any misdemeanor, without proof that such offenders are more likely than the general population to commit violent felonies or sex crimes (the kinds of offenses where DNA evidence is most useful).

And the buzz today among prosecutors, judges and defense lawyers is that proposals to take DNA from the entire population are next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. "If you have nothing to hide, why would you oppose this?"
I'm sure the freepers will be all over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC