Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Katrina cleanup a fleecing of America?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 09:18 PM
Original message
Is Katrina cleanup a fleecing of America?
Congress scrutinizes debris removal contracts for waste
The collection, hauling and smashing of debris in Louisiana and Mississippi resulting from Hurricane Katrina is still a daily ritual that has already cost taxpayers almost $2.5 billion. But government investigators and those closest to the cleanup now say hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars may have been wasted. Workers, contractors and government investigators say the large size of the contracts and the multiple tiers of subcontractors have pushed up the cost of the cleanup while slowing down the pace of the operation.

“I have not seen a better example of waste and ineptness in my lifetime,” says Troy Hebert, a part-time Louisiana state legislator and full-time owner of a debris removal company. Hebert has worked past hurricanes and complains that this time, the Army Corps of Engineers gave debris removal contracts to four major corporations — which did little actual cleanup themselves, instead farming out much of the job to layers of local subcontractors.

The result?

“They were able to make huge, huge sums of profits off of actually other people doing work to clean up our communities, and that's not the way it should be,” says Hebert.

The four primary contractors — Ashbritt Inc., CERES Environmental Services Inc., Environmental Chemical Corp. and Phillips and Jordan Inc. — were each provided with a $500 million contract and a $500 million option by the Army Corps. The companies claim that they did not permit multiple tiers of subcontractors but admit that in some cases their subcontractors may have subcontracted to others. By contract, Environmental Services Inc. permits only two layers of subcontractors, but the company acknowledges that in a few rare instances it found as many as five layers of subcontractors. Ashbritt says it took pains to ensure that it had only one tier of subcontractors on the debris removal work it performed in Mississippi. But in one case NBC News discovered four tiers of subcontractors.

more
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13153520/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does it involve the govt giving $ to private cnntractors? If so, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course...
Just like the Iraq War and just about everything else this administration has initiated. BushCo has opened up the federal trough so his corporate buddies can stick their snouts deep into it. This country is being looted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is Halliburton involved?
Does a bear shit in the woods? Is there just perhaps a conflict of interest with the VP being the former CEO of Halliburton and Halliburton receiving billions in no-bid contracts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dapper Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Day laborers... :-)
Some "contractor" hired some other "contractor" who hired some day laborers off the street... :-)

I can't insult the day laborers, they actually work hard as opposed to the "contractor" who only pays them $4 an hour netting the contractor Thousands of dollars for passing the buck.

Dap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dapper Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. ..err Haliburton...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undercutter2006 Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. FOX News
I was just watching a faux news segment titled 'Will crooks return to New Orleans'. This network is fucking unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. that's a rhetorical question, right? . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC