GOP Scandal Shows Dangers of Stifling Dissent
Robert Brownstein
October 8, 2006
If there was an Olympic competition in closing ranks, surely the Republican Party would take the gold.
Prominent conservatives and House Republican leaders tumbled over one another early last week to complain about the way House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) handled the sex scandal that forced the abrupt resignation of Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.).
In a private poll of top Republicans, Hastert still might not be their first choice to serve as speaker next year if the party retains its House majority. But by week's end, the public rebellion against him had almost entirely dried up. With leading conservative voices such as the Wall Street Journal editorial page insisting that any leadership change would only embolden Democrats, the flood of criticism thinned to a trickle.
At the revolt's high tide, House Majority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), jabbed at Hastert. By week's end, both looked like Chinese officials summoned to a self-criticism session during the Cultural Revolution: Each issued submissive statements praising Hastert and abjectly pledging their support. Even Paul M. Weyrich, a shrewd and independent conservative strategist, reversed his call for Hastert's resignation after an impassioned phone call from the speaker.
The pirouettes might be especially pronounced, but these are familiar steps for the GOP in recent years. Marginalizing internal dissent and promoting party unity have been hallmarks of the Republican governing strategy under President Bush.
(snip/...)
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-outlook8oct08,1,6045634.story?coll=la-headlines-politics