The more Justice Department officials and former officials testify before Congress, the dimmer the picture of the department's inner workings grows. To date, none of the officials responsible for listing U.S. attorneys for dismissal has been able or willing to disclose why they were listed and some later fired.
~snip~
Despite the inability or unwillingness of Gonzales and his associates to tell Congress and the public what happened, there have emerged several undisputed truths:
• Goodling, by her own admission, used partisan criteria to hire career prosecutors. This eroded the Justice Department's impartiality upon which the criminal justice system rests.
• Goodling testified under a grant of immunity from prosecution. She can be believed when she said her bosses had not been forthcoming to Congress.
• The attorney general of the United States entrusted to inexperienced and partisan aides the decision to fire chief federal prosecutors. According to Gonzales, he inexplicably let eight or nine U.S. attorneys — some praised as the nation's best prosecutors — be fired without knowing why they were being fired.
• While the attorney general, the man in charge, delegated the power to hire and fire U.S. attorneys, White House political operatives, including Karl Rove and Harriet Miers, were actively involved in identifying which federal prosecutors to fire.
• President Bush expressed continued confidence in Gonzales, saying the attorney general had done nothing wrong. In finding no fault, the president indirectly gave his blessing to the use of the Justice Department for partisan ends.
more:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/4834545.html