Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dr. Gerry Lower: Is The Question "Who is Bush" or is it "What is Bush"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:04 PM
Original message
Dr. Gerry Lower: Is The Question "Who is Bush" or is it "What is Bush"
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/11118

Is The Question "Who is Bush" or is it "What is Bush"
by Dr. Gerry Lower | Nov 19 2007 - 2:42pm |


The Problem With Infallibility is That Only Fools Believe It

snip//


In that regard, if you cannot see Dick Cheney as a walking, talking full-blown anti-Christ (in the tradition of the Papacy), then you may not be getting the larger picture. This secretive, psychotic, trigger-happy excuse for a man has no grasp whatsoever of human rights, human knowledge and human truth. The Dick stands on the same infallibly mindless ground that Pope Benedict stands upon.

In the Dick's sickly mind, there is no honest human truth. Every issue distills down to nothing but dog eat dog politics. As a result, the truth is something that one manufactures and manipulates in an effort to "win" one's case.

In the Dick's sickly mind, there is no such thing as objective human truth, there is only winning, no matter what it takes. As a result, every time that the Dick "wins" one, the People lose two, i.e., the thing itself and all choice in the matter. Same argument goes for Rove, as another pathetic example of what it means to be honest and human in the Republican party.

As for Bush, the only credit he will deserve is for being an ill-educated, incompetent operations manager for Dick Cheney who is captive of and driven by his infallible neoconservative Roman psychosis. Bush was never presidential material, a fact which Dick Cheney took overt advantage of by appointing himself to the vice-presidency. Buying into Cheney's program was Bush's first mistake on the road to becoming the worst president in U.S. history.

The Cheney-Bush administration is going to see to it that the prophetic "end of times" will come to pass as a result of its own, and the news media's, blind ignorance to what it is actually doing in the Middle East and in the world. Right along with our moral bankruptcy will inevitably come our fiscal bankruptcy as crony corporate capitalism and Old Testament Roman religion discredit themselves in the eyes of the world and from the global political arena. This will open the doors to the establishment of a global democracy based in human rights.

snip//

Do you realize that instead of being seen as a greed-driven, self-righteous, war-mongering nation in the eyes of the world, we could as easily have been seen as heroes in the eyes of the world. Today, we see only the mindless and uncaring America created by conservative political and religious capitalism, complements of the Cheney-Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Spot on! And then
there's tom friedman who thinks the dick should be Obama's VP. :silly:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2308776
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That blew my mind when I read that. What is Friedman thinking? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He must need
attention more than we ever thought possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Authoritiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Vouching...
In nominating him as their candidate, the Republican Party vouched for the competence, integrity, and, yes, sanity, of George W. Bush. In selecting Dick Cheney as his running mate, George W. Bush vouched for Dick Cheney's competence, integrity, and, yes, sanity.

Well, you can see that the trouble started right at the very beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC